The Importance of Exercise to Prevent Injuries in Athletes

May 22, 2020 updated by: Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala

EFFECTIVENESS OF A PROPRIOCEPTIVE EXERCISE PROGRAM IN THE PREVENTION OF INJURIES IN RECREATIONAL RUNNERS

Introduction: running is one of the most accessible and practiced sports in the world since the 21st century. Unfortunately, the incidence of injuries in the population that practices it is high regardless of experience, although the risk of injury increases in amateur runners. One of the main keys to reduce the incidence of running related injuries may be to improve the ability to reduce the load or impact. For this, there are different strategies such as a gradual increase in the load to run, and exercise within which is muscle strengthening and balance training or proprioception.

Objective: to verify the effectiveness of a program of proprioceptive exercises based on the static and dynamic balance for the reduction of lower limb injuries in amateur runners during the competition season.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methodology: 66 amateur runners, after simple size calculation, will be randomized into two groups. Experimental group will carry out the proprioceptive exercise program during 8 weeks at the begining of the season and control group will continue with their usual training routine. The main variable running related injury will be collected weekly during the follow-up.

Results: When all the data needed for the study has been collected, researchers gathers results and exports them for statistical interpretation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28871
        • Grupo Fisioterapia y Dolor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weekly training of at least 15 kilometers.
  • At least practice running 6 months for 1-3 times a week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To have some type of lower limb or lower back injury at present or in the last 6 months.
  • Having undergone surgery for any back or lower limb injury.
  • Pregnant.
  • Neural dysfunction / disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Group will carry out the proprioceptive exercise program during 8 weeks at the begining of the season
Group A will carry out two sessions of proprioceptive training per week, in a total of 8 weeks, during the pre-season period (September-October). Each session will last approximately 30 minutes and will include 6 exercises. The execution of the exercises will be supervised by a physiotherapist and a national trainer of athletics.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Control group will continue with their usual training routine
The subjects of the control group (group B) will be informed so that they do not include any change in their usual training routine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Joint Position Sense (JPS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Joint Position Sense Pressure at 8 weeks
JPSThe JPS is defined as the awareness of the actual position of the limb to quantify proprioception.The method for measuring JPS is to place the joint at a specific target angle and then, after the limb has been moved back to the starting angle, the subject is asked to actively or passively reproduce the target angle. The outcome of the measurement is the absolute error (AE), which is the difference between the true target angle and the reproduced angle
Change from Baseline Joint Position Sense Pressure at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Y Balance Test (YBT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline dynamic balance at 8 weeks
The YBT, derived from the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), has been reported to be a valid and reliable measure of dynamic balance; furthermore, the results of the YBT have been reported to be related to lower-extremity impairments and to be predictors of injuries.The YBT instrument has a central raised platform with three pieces of PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pipe in the three directions with a sliding plastic reach indicator that the participant pushes to determine reach distance.The YBT testing protocol assessed absolute reach and normalized distance for each direction, asymmetry between limbs, and composite score. Normalized reach distance is calculated by dividing reach distance by the limb length. Asymmetry is the absolute difference between right and left leg and is determined for each reach direction. The composite score is calculated by summing the reach distance in the three directions, dividing by three times limb length, and multiplying by 100.
Change from Baseline dynamic balance at 8 weeks
The countermovement jump (CMJ)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline jump height at 8 weeks
The CMJ is primarily used to measure an athlete's explosive lower-body power, and has become one of the most frequently used tests by coaches and researchers to indirectly measure power in the lower limbs. CMJ performance is reported as either jump height(centimeters).
Change from Baseline jump height at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo, Dr., Alcala University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEIM/HU/2018/29

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injury;Sports

Clinical Trials on Proprioceptive exercise program

Subscribe