Effects of Plyometrics Versus Conventional Exercises on Speed, Strength, and Injury Prevention in Bowlers.

Effects of Upper Body Plyometrics Versus Conventional Exercises on Speed, Strength and Injury Prevention in Bowlers.

To compare the effects of upper body plyometric versus conventional exercises on speed, strength, and injury prevention in bowlers

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Sports Physical Therapy; Sports Injury
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE PROGRAM; Other: CONVENTIONAL EXERCISE PROGRAM

Detailed Description

Bowling action is a highly skilled activity acquired over the year. A bowler needs speed and strength to challenge the batsman but the conventional protocols they follow for the speed and strength are not specific to their bowling actions. Bowling can result in different types of upper extremity injuries, such as rotator cuff sprains, impingement and stress fractures. There are many injury prevention programs such as electrostimulation training, resistance training, and plyometric training that can be used to treat upper limb injuries and improve maximal strength.

Plyometric training can be done by overhead athletes to improve the effectiveness of throwing activity and to strengthen the rotator cuff muscles to prevent shoulder injury from overhead throwing activity.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of upper limb plyometric exercises on speed, strength and injury prevention in comparison with conventional exercises.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 36
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Saad Rauf, Ph.D*; Phone Number: +923325957732; Email: saad.rauf@riphah.edu.pk

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Balochistan
    • Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan, 87300
      • Ayub Stadium
      • Contact: Saad Rauf, Ph.D*; Phone Number: +923325957732; Email: saad.rauf@riphah.edu.pk
      • Principal Investigator: Ibtahaj ul Islam, MS-SPT*

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 35 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Players bowling for at least one year
• Bowlers age 18 to 35 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any acute or chronic musculoskeletal injuries
• Any surgery in 6 months

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE PROGRAM GROUP; The Plyometric exercise group will receive 8 weeks of upper body plyometric exercise protocol. The session will last for 60 minutes 3 times per week. Exercises will be done according to FIIT protocol.	Other: PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE PROGRAM; This group will perform following exercises in first four weeks. Reverse overhead throw Rotational wall throws Overhead medicine ball Chest passes Resistance tubing 90-90 external rotation Frequency; Rest between Exercises-: 60-120 Seconds; Rest between Set of Exercise-: 45-60 Seconds after four weeks rest between exercise and rest between set of exercise will be reduced:; Rest between Exercises-: 45-60 Seconds; Rest between Set of Exercise-: 20-30 Seconds Tools used: Medicine Ball, Resistance band
Active Comparator: CONVENTIONAL EXERCISE PROGRAM GROUP; The conventional group will receive 8 weeks of upper body strength exercise protocol. The session will last for 60 minutes 3 times per week. Exercises will be done according to FIIT protocol.	Other: CONVENTIONAL EXERCISE PROGRAM; This group will perform following exercise through out the session with different frequencies after 4 weeks Bench presses Triceps kickbacks bicep curls Overhead presses Push-ups Frequency: Rest between Exercises-: 60-120 Seconds Rest between Set of Exercise-: 45-60 Seconds After 4 weeks the frequency will be: Rest between Exercises-: 45-60 Seconds Rest between Set of Exercise-: 20-30 Seconds

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Strength	Seated power throw (medicine ball) will be used to assess strength and explosive power of the upper body. The athlete sits on the floor with his legs fully extended, feet 24 inches (~60 cm) apart and with the back against a wall. The ball is held with the hands on the side and slightly behind the centre and back against the centre of the chest. The forearms are positioned parallel to the ground. The athlete throws the medicine ball vigorously as far straight forward as he can while maintaining the back against the wall. The distance thrown is recorded.	8 weeks
Speed	Speed gun will be used to assess the speed of a ball thrown by a bowler from one end of the pitch to another end.	8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Injury Prevention	DASH questionnaire (Reliability: ICC = 0.96, Validity: r > 0.70) It is a 30-item questionnaire that look the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This is a self-report questionnaire that patient can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5-point Likert chart.	8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Riphah International University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Saad Rauf, Ph.D*, Riphah International University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 1, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 1, 2023
• Study Completion (Actual): July 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 13, 2023
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 23, 2023
• First Posted (Actual): January 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 19, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 18, 2023
• Last Verified: July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Athletic Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: REC/01403 Ibtahaj ul Islam

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No