Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis

October 20, 2021 updated by: Sandoz

Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

The trial was conducted as a prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind study in 4 parallel groups of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study was the prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind study in 4 parallel groups of patients.

Patients underwent screening examinations at Visit 1. Patients who met all inclusion/ no exclusion criteria were randomized at the baseline visit (Day 1) to the double-blind treatment for a duration of 14 days but in case of delayed final visit (Day 15) the patient could voluntarily take reserve study medication for a maximum of 3 additional days.

After the end of the double-blind treatment phase, the patients underwent an end-of-treatment (EOT) examinations on Day 15 (+3).

A follow-up phone call within 7 days after Day 15 (or earlier in case of premature termination) was performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

944

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Burgas, Bulgaria, 8000
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Gabrovo, Bulgaria, 5300
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4000
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Sliven, Bulgaria, 8800
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1000
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1408
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1527
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1606
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Yambol, Bulgaria, 8600
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany, 01139
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Duisburg, Germany, 47051
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 2012
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 2025
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 2032
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 2044
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 2051
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Chișinău, Moldova, Republic of, 37
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Orhei, Moldova, Republic of, 3005
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650066
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117552
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119571
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 123184
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 142190
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630051
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390026
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191025
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191186
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 192283
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194291
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195197
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196084
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196158
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214031
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197376
        • Sandoz Investigative Site
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150000
        • Sandoz Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female subjects aged between 14 and 75 years inclusive on the date of consent
  2. Diagnosis of acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis defined at screening visit 1 and at Visit 2 as:

    1. major symptom score (MSS) assessed by the patient ≥8 and ≤12 points for the following: rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure, whereupon the nasal congestion is mandatory and no more than 3 of the 5 symptoms are rated as severe
    2. individual score for facial pain/pressure ≥1 (mild) and ≤2 (moderate)
    3. presence of symptoms ≤3 days prior to screening visit
  3. For adults (≥18 years): Informed consent to participate in the trial provided in written form; For adolescents (≥14 - <18 years): own subject informed consent/ assent to participate in the trial and the informed consent from all parent(s)/ legal guardian(s) provided in written form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to the active substance or any of the excipients of the trial medication
  2. Patient with history of hereditary fructose intolerance, galactose intolerance, lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  3. Chronic rhinosinusitis (symptoms lasting longer than 3 months)
  4. Subjects who have undergone sinus or nasal surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis in the 6 months prior to screening visit
  5. Sinus lavage within 7 days prior to screening visit
  6. Odontogenic rhinosinusitis
  7. Allergic (perennial or seasonal) rhinitis
  8. Bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  9. Nasal polyposis or clinically relevant nasal septum deviation
  10. Concomitant otitis
  11. Intranasal or systemic use of corticosteroids within 30 days prior to screening visit
  12. Intranasal or systemic use of antibiotics within 30 days prior to screening visit
  13. Use of nasal decongestants within 2 days prior to screening visit
  14. Concomitant treatment of common cold-like symptoms within 7 days prior to screening visit with any of the following:

    1. Analgesics
    2. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
    3. Antihistamines
  15. Concomitant use of intranasal saline irrigation
  16. Use of immunosuppressive agents within 30 days prior to screening visit
  17. Immunocompromised state
  18. Suspicion for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (defined as presence of purulence for 3 to 4 days with fever ≥ 38.3°C)
  19. Pregnant or breast-feeding female patient
  20. Female patient of childbearing potential (not surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or postmenopausal for at least 1 year) who is not currently using (documented at screening visit) and not willing to use medically reliable methods of contraception for the entire trial duration such as oral, injectable or implantable contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner
  21. Any other condition of the patient (e.g. serious or unstable medical or psychological condition, acute psychosis) that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise evaluation of the trial treatment or may jeopardize patient's safety, compliance or adherence to protocol requirements
  22. Participation in ANY research study involving another investigational medicinal product (IMP) within 30 days prior to screening visit, or simultaneous participation in another clinical study or previous participation in present study
  23. Suspected alcohol/ drug dependence or abuse (including heavy smoking: ≥ 20 cigarettes daily)
  24. Use of snuff tobacco
  25. Legal incapacity and/or other circumstances rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the trial
  26. Subjects who are known or suspected:

    • not to comply with the trial directives
    • not to be reliable or trustworthy
    • to be a dependent person, e.g. a relative, family member, or member/employee of the investigator's or sponsor's staff
    • subject is in custody or submitted to an institution due to a judicial order.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: 600 mg acetylcysteine
one tablet test product plus three tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
600 mg tablet
Placebo to acetylcysteine
Experimental: Group B: 1200 mg acetylcysteine
two tablets test product plus two tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
600 mg tablet
Placebo to acetylcysteine
Experimental: Group C: 2400 mg acetylcysteine
four tablets test product per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
600 mg tablet
Placebo Comparator: Group D: Placebo
four tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
Placebo to acetylcysteine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15.

Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15.

Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Onset of Action, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value<0.05) improvement from placebo.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Time to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value<0.05) improvement from placebo.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15.

Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15.

Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Day 4, 7, 10 and 15
Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.
Day 4, 7, 10 and 15
Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol Set
Time Frame: Day 4, 7, 10 and 15
Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.
Day 4, 7, 10 and 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinosinusitis

Clinical Trials on acetylcysteine

3
Subscribe