A Single-center, Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of Artificial Intelligence Medical Assisted Diagnostic Software (VeriSee DR) for Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

January 11, 2021 updated by: Acer Being Health Inc.
This study is to evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR for DR screening from color fundus photography images in patients with diabetes mellitus. The sensitivity and specificity of VeriSee DR's automated image analysis for screening the diabetes retinopathy will be determined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

703

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Persons with diabetes, twenty years of age or older, who have been referred to an ophthalmologists for a dilated eye examination to detect diabetic retinopathy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects enrolled in this study should meet all the following criteria.

    1. Subject with age ≥ 20 years old
    2. Subject with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
    3. Subject with image taken by color fundus photography that meet the following requirement:

      • The resolution of image is 1024×1024 pixels or higher;
      • The angle view of image is 45 or 50 degree.
    4. Subject's image includes macula and optic nerve as judged by the ophthalmologist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria.

    1. The color fundus photography image previously used by VeriSee DR during the development process and pre-clinical test
    2. The macula, optic nerve, or other part in the image of color fundus photography is unclear to determine the disease condition as judged by the ophthalmologist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 2 months

To evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR by determining the sensitivity.

Sensitivity = 100% x TP/(TP+FN)

2 months
Specificity
Time Frame: 2 months

To evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR by determining the specificity.

Specificity = 100% x TN/(TN+FP)

2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Predictive Values (PPV)
Time Frame: 2 months

To evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR by determining the positive predictive values (PPV).

Positive predictive value (PPV) =100% x TP/(TP+FP)

2 months
Negative Predictive Values (NPV)
Time Frame: 2 months

To evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR by determining the negative predictive values (NPV).

Negative predictive value (NPV) = 100% x TN/(FN+TN)

2 months
Percentage of Participant Images With Insufficient Quality as Judged by VeriSee DR
Time Frame: 2 months

To determine the percentage of subjects' images with insufficient quality as judged by VeriSee DR.

The percentage of subjects who have the images with insufficient quality as determined by VeriSee DR will be presented.

2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Subscribe