Neurofeedback Impact on Veterans With mTBI (NFBVETmTBI)

October 15, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Neurofeedback Impact on Chronic Headache, Sleep and Attention Disorders Experienced by Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

This study will evaluate neurofeedback (NFB) training as a low risk, non-invasive, effective treatment for Veterans diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and experiencing chronic post-concussive symptoms (PCSs). Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control group. Groups will be compared on primary measures of headache, insomnia and attention. Other outcomes of interest include post-traumatic stress symptoms, depression, quality of life and other measures of well-being.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate neurofeedback (NFB) training as a low risk, non-invasive, effective treatment for Veterans diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and experiencing chronic post-concussive symptoms (PCSs). Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control group. Groups will be compared on primary measures of headache, insomnia and attention. Other outcomes of interest include post-traumatic stress symptoms, depression, quality of life and other measures of well-being.

Both the intervention and control group will participate in four assessment sessions. The assessment sessions will occur at the beginning of the study, at 4-6 weeks, at 8-10 weeks, and 2-months later. Participation in this research will last about 4 months. Those in the control group will be offered neurofeedback treatment, extending their participation time by 4 months (8 months total participation).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96819-1522
        • VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and non-pregnant female OEF-OIF-OND Veterans diagnosed with mTBI ages 18 to 65
  • Complaints of chronic headaches, insomnia, and attention difficulties
  • Able to read and write English
  • Able to comprehend what they read
  • Able to follow directions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant female Veteran
  • Non OEF-OIF-OND Veteran who is diagnosed with mTBI
  • Under the age of 18 or over the age of 65
  • Severe TBI
  • Impaired decision-making capacity
  • Unable to comply with study visit schedule
  • Suicide Intent as indicated by a positive response to questions 3, 4, 5, or 8 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) secondary screen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NFB Intervention and Delayed Intervention
The NFB system will read and interpret a participant's brain wave pattern which will be instantaneously fed back to the participant providing information, to which a participant can respond accordingly. The NFB specialist assumes a coaching role with people training on the NFB special use system to assist in the achievement of a focused relaxed state, which enhances the overall brain functioning. The significance and unique aspect of NFB is the direct impact on physiological dysregulation, which is the basis of this treatment approach. Twenty, one-hour, NFB training sessions will be provided to each participant in the intervention group and Delayed intervention group (those participants who completed the Control Group activities) by a trained NFB specialist over an 8-10-week period. Participants in the intervention group will receive up to 5-sessions but usually 3 sessions a week
Participants are seated in a comfortable chair and have common EEG electrodes with a pre-application of EEG adhesion conductive paste placed on scalp. The participant will receive coaching as they look at the game training screen and focus on the image. The game training screen provides almost instantaneous feedback (within 200 milliseconds) to participants about brain functioning. Twenty, one-hour, NFB training sessions will be provided by a trained NFB specialist over an 8-10-week period with up to 5-sessions but usually 3 sessions a week. The specific NFB special use system that will be used is the Cygnet NFB System from Bee Medic Corporation. The latest technological advances in this system has enabled training frequencies in the infra-low frequency range as well as in all other relevant frequency ranges which is a breakthrough capacity not available on any other NFB system. This will enable the individualized training to the person's brain training preference.
Other Names:
  • EEG Biofeedback, Neurotherapy
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in the control group will continue with their usual treatment and will receive a 15-minute call once a week for eight weeks from an Investigator on a health topic. This will help to keep members of the control group engaged in the project and receive the same information that is offered to the intervention group members. The health topics that are generally discussed during NFB sessions include sleep hygiene, basic nutritional concepts, beverage choices, positive thinking, thought reframing, fitness, daily calming activity, and enhancement of focus strategies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
The HIT-6 is a 6-question tool designed to describe and communicate the way people feel and what they cannot do because of their headache. (6 questions, 3 min) Scores vary from 36 - 78. Higher score worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
NEUROQOLTBI Headache Pain Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Developed as part of NIH Toolbox NEUROQOL TBI. It is comprised of 10 questions related to the nature and response to headaches. (10 items, 5 minutes). Score range 10-50. Higher scores suggest worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Seven question self-report instrument used to quantify perceived current insomnia. Targets past week's symptoms and daytime consequences consistent with DSM-IV criteria. (7 items, 5 min) Scores vary from 0 - 28. Higher score worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
NEUROQOLTBI Sleep Disturbance Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Developed as part of NIH Toolbox NEUROQOL TBI. It is comprised of 8 questions related to the sleep experience and impact. (8 items, 5 minutes). Score range: 8-40. Higher scores suggest worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
QIKtest Continuous Performance Test - Accuracy Index
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Computerized visual performance test to assess attention and impulse control, speed and consistency of response. Specifically intended for use by neurofeedback clinicians. (21 min). Higher scores indicate better performance. Score range: 165-420.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QOLIBRI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
A 37-item instrument consisting of 6 scales measuring cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems. Designed to measure quality of life specific for TBI. (37 items, 15 min). Score range: 0-100. Higher score suggests better outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
NEUROQOLTBI Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Developed as part of NIH Toolbox NEUROQOL TBI. It is comprised of 10 questions related to level of satisfaction with life roles and activities. (10 items, 5 min). Score range: 8-40. Higher score suggests better outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
NEUROQOLTBI Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Developed as part of NIH Toolbox NEUROQOL TBI. It is comprised of 10 questions related to level of ability to do life roles and activities. (10 items, 5 min). Score range 8-40. Higher score suggests better outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
NEUROQOLTBI Positive Affect and Well-being-short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Developed as part of NIH Toolbox NEUROQOL TBI. It is comprised of 10 questions related to level of positive attitude and sense of well-being (9 items, 5 min). Score range: 9-45. Higher score better outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS21)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
DASS21 is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. Can be used as a single assessment of psychological distress (21 items, 10 min). Score varies from 0 - 63. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
PHQ-9 is a nine-item depression self-report module from the full Patient Health Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-27. (9 items, 2-5 min) Score varies from 0-27. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
The PCL-5 is a 20-item questionnaire, corresponding to the DSM-5 symptom criteria for PTSD. The wording of PCL-5 items reflects both changes to existing symptoms and the addition of new symptoms in DSM-5. (20 items, 5-10 min) Score varies from 0-80. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
General Symptom Inventory (GSI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Self-report instrument of symptoms in 7 categories including sleep, attention and learning, sensory, behavioral, emotional, physical, and pain (less than 10 min). Score varies from 0-464. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
Change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic Data form
Time Frame: Baseline, change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up
Collection of Demographic data that includes Gender, age, diagnoses (and changes), current co-occurring treatments (and changes), medications (and changes). Information as stated initially and any changes if appropriate. No scores.
Baseline, change from baseline midtreatment at 4-6 weeks, change from baseline endpoint at 8-10 weeks, and change from baseline at 2 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judy M Carlson, EdD, VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Insomnia

Clinical Trials on Neurofeedback (NFB)

Subscribe