Ultrasonography for Prediction of Extubation Success: a Holistic Approach (APEX)

December 10, 2019 updated by: Jasper M Smit, MD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
This study evaluates thickening fraction alone and together with other ultrasound parameters of heart and lungs as predictors for extubation outcome

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Weaning patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the mechanical ventilator is a critical period and accounts for 40% of the duration of mechanical ventilation itself. Weaning failure includes failing the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and patients with extubation failure. Extubation failure is defined as reintubation or need for rescue non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours following extubation. Patients failing extubation experience increased time spent on the mechanical ventilator and even increased mortality rates. Given these risks, predicting readiness for extubation is of key importance in the ICU.

Studies have shown, that US is a viable tool for routine use due to its bedside availability and non-invasiveness, while still maintaining excellent predictive values for its respective applications. For this reason, over the past years, critical care ultrasonography (US) has become an important part of routine bedside assessment Lately, the diaphragm has been studied extensively, due to its strong role in sustaining spontaneous breathing. Especially predicting extubation outcomes

has become a great field of interest and different studies have been conducted on this topic. Currently, indices such as diaphragm thickening (Tdi), diaphragm thickness (Tdi%) and diaphragm motion are the most frequently used parameters. Of these, thickening fraction seems to be the most promising to predict successful extubation.

However, all of the studies conducted, solely looked at diaphragm function and compared them to current standards such as the rapid shallow breathing index, while disregarding other factors strongly correlated to extubation failure, e.g. respiratory and cardiac function, as proposed by Mayo et al. Taking heart and lung function into account as well seems to be an interesting approach, because additional measurements could possibly improve predictive value while putting no further burden on the patient. Furthermore, both heart and lungs can be assessed quickly and easily by ultrasound. Cardiac parameters that are potentially useful are left ventricular function, mitral diastolic inflow and cardiac output. Regarding the lungs, pleural effusion is associated with rate of success for extubation. Effusion is detected easily and recent studies have shown, that in an ICU setting a simple 8 region protocol is sufficient to detect extra vascular lung water.

The investigators hypothesise that a holistic US approach, including measurements of heart, lungs and diaphragm, will be superior to the core diagnostic parameters of the diaphragm in predicting extubation success in mechanically ventilated critical care patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of adult (>18 years) patients, admitted to the ICU and ventilated for at least 72h.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ventilated for > 72 hours
  • Passed spontaneous breathing trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned NIV
  • Palliative Extubation
  • Tracheostomy
  • Paraplegia above Th 8

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ventilated72h
Patient that were ventilated for at least 72 hours
Point of care ultrasound as part of routine physical examination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 48 hours
Sensitivity of thickening fraction for extubation failure
48 hours
Specificity
Time Frame: 48 hours
Specificity of thickening fraction for extubation failure
48 hours
Area under the Curve
Time Frame: 48 hours
Area under the receiver operator curve
48 hours
Correlation of ultrasound variables with extubation outcome
Time Frame: 48 hours
Correlation of ultrasound variables with extubation outcome through (logistic)regression analysis.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016.465

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon we request we can share our data to assist other researchers with interest in this field of research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication in a peer reviewed journal

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Subscribe