Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Ultrasonography for Prediction of Extubation Success: a Holistic Approach (APEX)

10. december 2019 opdateret af: Jasper M Smit, MD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
This study evaluates thickening fraction alone and together with other ultrasound parameters of heart and lungs as predictors for extubation outcome

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Weaning patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the mechanical ventilator is a critical period and accounts for 40% of the duration of mechanical ventilation itself. Weaning failure includes failing the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and patients with extubation failure. Extubation failure is defined as reintubation or need for rescue non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours following extubation. Patients failing extubation experience increased time spent on the mechanical ventilator and even increased mortality rates. Given these risks, predicting readiness for extubation is of key importance in the ICU.

Studies have shown, that US is a viable tool for routine use due to its bedside availability and non-invasiveness, while still maintaining excellent predictive values for its respective applications. For this reason, over the past years, critical care ultrasonography (US) has become an important part of routine bedside assessment Lately, the diaphragm has been studied extensively, due to its strong role in sustaining spontaneous breathing. Especially predicting extubation outcomes

has become a great field of interest and different studies have been conducted on this topic. Currently, indices such as diaphragm thickening (Tdi), diaphragm thickness (Tdi%) and diaphragm motion are the most frequently used parameters. Of these, thickening fraction seems to be the most promising to predict successful extubation.

However, all of the studies conducted, solely looked at diaphragm function and compared them to current standards such as the rapid shallow breathing index, while disregarding other factors strongly correlated to extubation failure, e.g. respiratory and cardiac function, as proposed by Mayo et al. Taking heart and lung function into account as well seems to be an interesting approach, because additional measurements could possibly improve predictive value while putting no further burden on the patient. Furthermore, both heart and lungs can be assessed quickly and easily by ultrasound. Cardiac parameters that are potentially useful are left ventricular function, mitral diastolic inflow and cardiac output. Regarding the lungs, pleural effusion is associated with rate of success for extubation. Effusion is detected easily and recent studies have shown, that in an ICU setting a simple 8 region protocol is sufficient to detect extra vascular lung water.

The investigators hypothesise that a holistic US approach, including measurements of heart, lungs and diaphragm, will be superior to the core diagnostic parameters of the diaphragm in predicting extubation success in mechanically ventilated critical care patients.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

83

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

The study population consisted of adult (>18 years) patients, admitted to the ICU and ventilated for at least 72h.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ventilated for > 72 hours
  • Passed spontaneous breathing trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned NIV
  • Palliative Extubation
  • Tracheostomy
  • Paraplegia above Th 8

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Ventilated72h
Patient that were ventilated for at least 72 hours
Point of care ultrasound as part of routine physical examination

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Sensitivity
Tidsramme: 48 hours
Sensitivity of thickening fraction for extubation failure
48 hours
Specificity
Tidsramme: 48 hours
Specificity of thickening fraction for extubation failure
48 hours
Area under the Curve
Tidsramme: 48 hours
Area under the receiver operator curve
48 hours
Correlation of ultrasound variables with extubation outcome
Tidsramme: 48 hours
Correlation of ultrasound variables with extubation outcome through (logistic)regression analysis.
48 hours

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. september 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

29. november 2019

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

2. december 2019

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

9. december 2019

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. december 2019

Først opslået (Faktiske)

12. december 2019

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

12. december 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

10. december 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 2016.465

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Upon we request we can share our data to assist other researchers with interest in this field of research.

IPD-delingstidsramme

After publication in a peer reviewed journal

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Mekanisk ventilation

Kliniske forsøg med Ultrasound

Abonner