- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04261621
Early Identification of SEPsis SIGNs in Emergency Department (SepSIGN)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Sepsis is an important health issue with considerable socio-economic consequences. In 2017, the World Health Association made sepsis a global health priority, and has adopted a resolution to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of sepsis.
Over the last decade, a decrease in the mortality rate has been observed; in particular thanks to improved management, more appropriate intervention approaches in the Emergency Department (ED) and better recognition of organ failure. This statement is based on qSOFA and SOFA scores from the international Sepsis-3 definition. Sepsis-3 can help front-line clinicians detect severe patients with a higher risk of mortality but does not predict the clinical deterioration especially in patients without initial organ dysfunction. Furthermore, studies still demonstrate that 20% of patients with infection or uncomplicated sepsis experience disease worsening within 72 hours after ED admission.
Symptoms and signs of sepsis are variable and this makes clinical recognition and assessment very difficult in particular on Emergency Department (ED) patients due to their infectious illness background and the frequent comorbidities.
Unfortunately, as of today, no biological marker has yet been validated to appropriately predict early deterioration in unselected patients admitted to the ED with acute infection, irrespective of their clinical presentation. Physiology of sepsis is complex and some underlying dysfunction could already exist in the early phase of sepsis before patients meet diagnostic criteria. Thus, patients may be clinically asymptomatic at the origin of organ failure. As a result, doubtful patients are often over-hospitalized while they could be treated at home, leading to overcrowding and extra costs for hospitals In these conditions, the main challenge of ED clinicians is differentiating mild infections from life-threatening ones in the heavy workload of ED environment. Objective of SepSIGN project is to validate biomarkers able to predict the clinical worsening of patients freshly admitted at Emergency Department. Targeted population is adult patients freshly admitted at ED, whom blood samples will serve to validate candidate markers.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aurillac, France, 15000
- CH Henri Mondor Aurillac
-
La Tronche, France, 38700
- Chu Grenoble Alpes
-
Limoges, France, 87000
- CHU Dupuytren
-
Lyon, France, 69003
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot, HCL
-
Montauban, France, 82000
- CH de Montauban
-
Paris, France, 75012
- Hôpital Saint-Antoine AP-HP
-
Tours, France, 37044
- Hôpital Trousseau CHRU
-
-
-
-
-
Monaco, Monaco, 98000
- Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
-
-
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado School of Medicine
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- University of Washington Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All of the following criteria:
- Delay between ED presentation and inclusion must not exceed 12h
- Age 18 years or greater
- Acute infection suspected or confirmed
That fulfills at least two of the following systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria:
- Temperature > 38°C (100.4°F) or < 36°C (96.8°F)
- Heart rate > 90 bpm
- Respiratory rate > 20 cycles/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg
- Leukocyte > 12000/mm3 or < 4000/mm3 or 10% bands
- With a delta SOFA < 2 from baseline
At Risk for deterioration defined as:
- any patient that the emergency department physician has admitted or intends to admit as an inpatient* to the hospital.
- patients discharged home (outpatient**) who are either i) >65 years old or ii) diagnosed with pneumonia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to obtain a valid and written consent from a patient or their legally authorized representative in accordance with the local regulatory instances (this include in FR: Person not affiliated to a health insurance scheme, or not a beneficiary of such a scheme. Persons who are the subject of a legal protection order. Person with restricted freedom following a legal or administrative decision and a person admitted without their consent pursuant to Articles L.3212-1 and 3213-1, which are not included in Article L.1122-8 of the French Public Health Code.)
- Known pregnancy, in labor or breastfeeding
- Patients with isolated uncomplicated pharyngitis, sinusitis, or otitis media
- Infectious symptoms present for > 5 days prior to presentation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
number of patients with deterioration within 72-hour period following T0 (enrollment)
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after admission
|
clinical deterioration of a patient at any time during the 72-hour period following T0 (enrollment), which is defined as any of the following:
|
Up to 72 hours after admission
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants that have been re-admission
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after admission
|
Re-admission in hospital any time from T0 to T72h (for patients who have been admitted) OR Admission any time from T0 to T72h (for patients who were discharged from the emergency department)
|
Up to 28 days after admission
|
Number of patients with Early and late mortality
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after admission
|
Early and late mortality defined by vital status of patients (alive or dead) at Day 28.
This information will be collected on the associated eCRF or obtained using follow up procedures (including telephone call) for the patients discharged.
|
Up to 28 days after admission
|
number of patients with confirmed bacterial and viral infection
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after admission
|
the adjudication committee will also confirm site of infection and diagnosis of infection A. Confirmed sites of infections B. Infection status (Infection DEFINITELY present / Infection LIKELY present / Infection LIKELY NOT present / NON INFECTIOUS diagnosis identified) C. Viral versus bacterial infections
|
Up to 28 days after admission
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SepSIGN
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityEnrolling by invitationSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); New York Presbyterian Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Infection | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
-
Inverness Medical InnovationsCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States