Pharmacist-led Hepatitis C Management (PHARM-C)

April 19, 2022 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Pharmacist-led Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Rapid Management - in Community

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) continues to disproportionately affect vulnerable and marginalized persons in Canada. During the interferon treatment era, certain circumstances precluded individuals from receiving treatment, most notably mental health concerns or active substance use. In addition to the tolerability and efficacy of all-oral direct acting antivirals (DAAs), novel diagnostic strategies have also increased engagement in the care cascade. Point-of care and/or dried blood spot antibody as well as RNA testing allow for diagnosis without the need for phlebotomy, a major barrier for those with a history of past or current injection drug use. Despite these advances in diagnostic streamlining and increased cure rates, engagement post-diagnosis continues to be a major gap. Although the exact mechanism of HCV acquisition may not be clear - people who inject drugs, persons who are street-involved or low-income, or persons who are difficult-to-reach for other reasons, often experience both structural and geographic challenges to obtaining care. Community pharmacists may be the first point of contact for higher risk populations and may avoid testing and/or treatment for fear of judgement or poor treatment in hospital/specialist settings. While studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treating people receiving opioid against therapy (OAT), it remains unclear whether Canadian pharmacists can safely and effectively screen, and/or confirm HCV, work-up patients for HCV treatment, and prescribe with minimal oversight. If this model proves successful, it may have global utility especially in areas of the world where pharmacists are the initial point of contact for healthcare issues. The aim of this study is to determine whether being tested and linked care and treatment will be more effective in a community pharmacy than a referral to a tertiary care hospital for management of HCV among people on stable OAT, or other populations who experience barriers to care but use community pharmacy services.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4Y 1G7
        • Recruiting
        • Specialty Rx Solutions
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HCV infection
  2. HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/mL
  3. Aged 18 to 80
  4. Willingness and capacity to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of or history of decompensated cirrhosis. This will be defined as evidence of clinical decompensation (history of either ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy/confusion), and Child-Pugh-Turcotte and Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score will also be used to assess this using laboratory investigations and clinical findings.
  2. Platelets < 75,000/mm3, total albumin <35 g/L, total bilirubin (total and direct) >34.2 μmol/L, International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5
  3. History of current or past hepatocellular carcinoma
  4. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection as indicated by positive testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg +ve)or untreated HIV co-infection
  5. Prior HCV antiviral therapy with direct-acting antivirals with or without peginterferon/ribavirin
  6. Chronic liver disease other than mild non-alcoholic or alcoholic fatty liver disease from a cause other than HCV
  7. Significant co-morbid illness that precludes inclusion in the opinion of the investigator
  8. Life expectancy of less than 1 year. If clarity is required, the provider who delivered the diagnosis will be contacted.
  9. Pregnancy/breast-feeding/inability to use contraception
  10. Use of concomitant contraindicated drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Community Pharmacist-Led
Patients in Arm 1 will receive care and treatment at their home pharmacy and be evaluated and treated by a community pharmacist under medical directives and with study oversight.
Rapid testing in a community pharmacy, with rapid linkage to care and treatment that is pharmacist-led
Active Comparator: Academic hepatology
Patients in Arm 2 will be evaluated and treated by hepatologists at the Toronto Centre for Liver Disease.
Rapid testing in a community pharmacy, with standard of care referral to academic hepatology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intention to treat by Completion Rates
Time Frame: 24 months
Intention to treat direct acting antiviral (DAA) completion rates in non-cirrhotic or compensated cirrhotic patients treated with DAAs in pharmacist-led programs in community pharmacies, compared to treatment completion rates with referral and treatment in tertiary care hepatology (Toronto Centre for Liver Disease).
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained Virologic Response by Intention-to-Treat
Time Frame: 24 months
Compare Sustained Virologic Response rates by Intention to treat in both sites.
24 months
Sustained Virologic Response by modified Intention-to-Treat
Time Frame: 24 months
Compare the rates of Sustained Virologic Response by modified Intention to treat (including all participants who take at least one dose of medication)
24 months
Sustained Virologic Response by Per Protocol analysis
Time Frame: 24 months
Compare the rates of Sustained Virologic Response by per protocol analysis including all individuals who complete treatment in both groups.
24 months
Hepatitis C Community seroprevalence in downtown Toronto
Time Frame: 18 months
Determine the seroprevalence of HCV among individuals tested in downtown Toronto.
18 months
Community Pharmacist Fibrosis Identification
Time Frame: 18 months
Comparison of pharmacist-assessed fibrosis stage vs fibrosis stage assessed by hepatologist (gold standard)
18 months
Community Pharmacist Decompensation Identification
Time Frame: 18 months
Comparison of pharmacist-assessed hepatic decompensation score vs hepatic decompensation assessed by hepatologist (gold standard)
18 months
Minimum Mean Time-to-Treatment
Time Frame: 18 months
Determine the minimum mean time-to-treatment initiation in both groups
18 months
Community Appointment Adherence
Time Frame: 24 months
Assess appointment adherence in both arms
24 months
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 18 months
Assess self-reported medication adherence at both sites
18 months
Quality of Life and Substance Use
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate quality of life for patients with chronic liver disease (CLDQ-HCV) before and after treatment (endpoint and SV12) at both sites.
24 months
Substance Use
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate the Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP) before and after treatment (endpoint and SV12) at both sites.
24 months
Patient Understanding and Satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 months
Compare patient understanding and satisfaction with HCV treatment with the Hepatitis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (HPSQ)
24 months
Reinfection
Time Frame: 24 months
Assess rates of reinfection in patients who achieve Sustained Virologic Response, at 48 weeks.
24 months
Patient empowerment
Time Frame: 24 months
Compare measure of patient empowerment by treatment-arm using the Health Care Empowerment (HCE) survey
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Clinical Trials on Pharmacist-Led care

Subscribe