Comparison of the Results of Premature Babies Started Complementary Feeding (COTROPBSCF)

Comparison of the Results of Premature Babies Started Complementary Feeding in Adjusted or Chronologically in Their Sixth Month

Neurological-developmental evaluations and developmental outcomes-diagnoses of premature babies are evaluated according to corrected postnatal age. Based on the limited evidence available, it can be concluded that complementary feeding may be an appropriate age for most premature babies who have reached at least the third month, generally corrected. However, for premature babies born at different gestational weeks, these periods have a relatively different meaning. A more accurate timeframe can be found in terms of complementary nutrition by evaluating chronological age and motor development together. More prospective observational studies are needed in this regard in premature babies. In the literature, there are not enough studies on the transition time to the most appropriate complementary diet for premature babies. The investigators planned to do this prospective observational study. In this study, patient groups will be randomly selected after appropriate matching. Premature babies participating in the study will be handled in three main groups (six subgroups in total). The data will be added to the case report forms. In addition to routine follow-ups, families will be called on the phone monthly, information about their babies' nutrition will be asked, whether there is a problem, questions of families will be answered, and information about complementary nutrition will be provided. At the end of the study, all data will be collected and entered into the SPSS database, which will be created.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Premature Birth; Feeding Behavior

Detailed Description

The transition to complementary feeding in premature babies (37 weeks and over) is recommended by both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Association (ESPHGAN) for 4-6 months. However, a full consensus on the transition time to complementary feeding has not been achieved for premature babies. It is controversial whether premature babies (born 37th week of gestation) are corrected for complementary feeding in the sixth month or chronological sixth month. According to the known, there are no clinical studies investigating this topic in the literature.

Neurological-developmental evaluations and developmental outcomes-diagnoses of premature babies are evaluated according to corrected postnatal age. Based on the limited evidence available, it can be concluded that complementary feeding may be an appropriate age for most premature babies who have reached at least the third month, generally corrected. However, for premature babies born at different gestational weeks, these periods have a relatively different meaning. A more accurate timeframe can be found in terms of complementary nutrition by evaluating chronological age and motor development together. More prospective observational studies are needed in this regard in premature babies. In the literature, there are not enough studies on the transition time to the most appropriate complementary diet for premature babies. The investigators planned to do this prospective observational study.

In this study, patient groups will be randomly selected after appropriate matching. Premature babies participating in the study will be handled in three main groups (six subgroups in total).

Before the transition to complementary nutrition of the groups included in the study, breast milk and / or formula food, nutritional supplement (such as breast milk enhancer, protein supplement) intake will be recorded. The same polyvitamin preparation will be used for all premature babies. In accordance with the recommendation of the World Health Organization, 2 mg / kg / day standard oral iron prophylaxis will be started to all premature babies starting from the second chronological month. Immunization will be done in accordance with the national vaccination program.

The data will be added to the case report forms. In addition to routine follow-ups, families will be called on the phone monthly, information about their babies' nutrition will be asked, whether there is a problem, questions of families will be answered, and information about complementary nutrition will be provided. At the end of the study, all data will be collected and entered into the SPSS database, which will be created.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 120

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Ankara, Turkey
    • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 10 months to 7 months (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Group 1: 29 weeks and six days of gestation and earlier Group 2: Those whose gestational age is between 30 weeks and 33 weeks and sixth days Group 3: Those whose gestational age is between 34 weeks and 37 weeks and sixth day

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male / female babies who were born before the mother at the Hacettepe University Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and / or Hacettepe University Adult Hospital Maternity and Birth Service and were born earlier than 37 weeks.
• Babies who are at the Hacettepe University Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and / or Hacettepe University Adult Hospital Maternity and Maternity Service, were born earlier than 37 weeks and continue to be followed regularly in the neonatal outpatient clinic.
• Babies whose informed consent was obtained for their participation by the family.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Babies with SGA (birth weight below 10th percentile according to gestational week) by birth weight
• Babies with chromosomal anomalies
• Babies diagnosed with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
• Babies who have had major surgical operations (gastrointestinal anomaly, severe necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery, major gastrointestinal system anomaly, major congenital heart anomaly, diaphragmatic hernia)
• Babies with exitus in the neonatal period
• Babies who do not continue regular polyclinic follow-up after discharge
• Babies of families who do not comply with the study protocol
• Babies with missing study data

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Cohort
• Time Perspectives: Prospective

Number of groups / cohorts

3

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1; Group 1: 29 weeks and six days of gestation and earlier Group 1a: complementary feeding began chronologically in the sixth month Group 1b: Complementary feeding corrected at sixth month
2; Group 2: Those whose gestational age is between 30 weeks and 33 weeks and sixth days Group 2a: complementary feeding began chronologically in the sixth month Group 2b: complementary feeding started in the sixth month, corrected
3; Group 3: Those whose gestational age is between 34 weeks and 37 weeks and sixth day Group 3a: complementary feeding began chronologically in the sixth month Group 3b: complementary feeding started in the sixth month, corrected

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
the transition time to the most appropriate complementary diet for premature babies	. In the literature, there are not enough studies on the transition time to the most appropriate complementary diet for premature babies. We planned to do this prospective observational study.	24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Reaching the targeted number of patients	In this time we aim to reach the targeted number of patients	24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Hacettepe University

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• complementary feeding
• weaning and complementary feeding in premature babies

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 8, 2020
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2022
• Study Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 31, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 31, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): August 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 7, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 5, 2020
• Last Verified: August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: prematurity; complementary feeding
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pregnancy Complications; Obstetric Labor Complications; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Premature Birth
• Other Study ID Numbers: KA-20053

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No