The Rural African American's Health Project (RAAFHP)

August 11, 2020 updated by: Gene H. Brody, University of Georgia
This is an attention controlled randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of the Strong African American Families-Teen program. The two arm trial tests SAAF-T, a family centered brief intervention against a similarly designed program that targets nutrition and exercise. The outcomes examined include substance use and risky sexual behavior.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In the past, African American adolescents in rural areas have avoided the high-risk behaviors prevalent among youth in urban areas. Recent epidemiologic data, however, indicate that rural African American youth use substances and engage in high-risk sexual behavior at rates equal to or exceeding those in densely populated inner cities (Kogan, Berkel, Chen, Brody, & Murry, in press; Milhausen et al., 2003). These risk behaviors predict HIV infection, adolescent parenthood, school dropout, involvement with the criminal justice system, and continued substance use during early adulthood (Friedman et al., 1996; Miller, Boyer, & Cotton, 2004; St. Lawrence & Scott, 1996; Tucker, Orlando, & Ellickson, 2003). No developmentally appropriate, culturally sensitive prevention programs have been developed to deter substance use and high-risk sexual behavior among the several million African American adolescents who live in the rural South (Murry & Brody, 2004). To address this public health need, Drs. Brody and Murry from the University of Georgia and Drs. DiClemente and Wingood from Emory University designed a multicomponent, family-centered prevention program, the Strong African American Families-Teen program (SAAF-T). We conducted a randomized prevention trial to test the program's efficacy. The sample included 502 rural African American families with a 10th-grade student, half of whom will be assigned randomly to a prevention group and half to an attention-control group. Pre-intervention, post-intervention, and long-term follow-up assessments of adolescents' substance use and high-risk sexual behavior were gathered from the entire sample. Specific aims were to test hypotheses that rural African American adolescents randomly assigned to participate in SAAF-T, compared to attention-control participants, will demonstrate lower rates of substance use and risky sexual behavior.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

502

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identified Black or African American
  • 10th grade in public school in targeted county

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to participate in group-based intervention due to mental health

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SAAF-T
Participants received a 5 session, 10-hour family centered prevention program designed to prevent substance use, conduct problems, and risky sexual behavior
Parents and youth meet separately during first hour to engage in activities then meet in family groups during the second hours of each session.
Other Names:
  • Strong AFrican American Families-Teen Program
Placebo Comparator: Fuel for Families
Participants received a 5 session, 10 hour family centered program that focused on healthy nutrition and exercise.
Parents and youth meet separately during first hour to engage in activities then meet in family groups during the second hours of each session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use
Time Frame: Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline
Index of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use in the past 3 months
Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline
Risky Sexual Behavior
Time Frame: Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline
Count of unprotected intercourse
Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptomology- CES-D Scale
Time Frame: Symptoms in past week assessed, follow up period includes baseline to 22 months post baseline
Symptoms of depression, 20 items
Symptoms in past week assessed, follow up period includes baseline to 22 months post baseline
Conduct Problems
Time Frame: Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline
Using 14 questions from the National Youth Survey,adolescents indicated the frequency during the past 6 months with which they had fought, stolen, been truant from school, or been suspended from school. Adolescents' responses were summed, and the sum constituted the conduct problems score.13
Follow up period baseline to 22 months post-baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discussion Quality Scale
Time Frame: Follow up period -baseline to 6 month posttest
The DQS assessed communication frequency and quality for discussions of difficult issues.
Follow up period -baseline to 6 month posttest
Family Support Inventory
Time Frame: Follow up period -baseline to 6 month posttest
The FSI measured provision of emotional support, involvement, and quality of caregiver-youth communication
Follow up period -baseline to 6 month posttest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2006-10685

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SAAF-T

Clinical Trials on SAAF-T

3
Subscribe