- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05253235
Health and Resilience Projects: Foundations (HARP-F)
Can Family-Centered Prevention Programming Reduce Neuroimmune Vulnerabilities for Drug Use and Cardiometabolic Risk Among African American Adolescents? A Randomized Prevention Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
During childhood and adolescence, family relationships play critical roles in regulating physiological stress reactions. This protects the developing brain from the potentially deleterious effects of stress hormones and neurochemicals. In a series of proof-of-principle studies, the investigators studied the potential for the Strong African American Families (SAAF) drug use prevention program delivered when youth were age 11 to protect participants from the consequences of social adversity when they were transitioning to adulthood (ages 19-25). Effects were detected on a range of outcomes associated with neuroimmune (NIN) dysregulation including inflammation, the neural structure of limbic regions, prefrontal-limbic connectivity, and cardiometabolic health. Although these findings are provocative, the SAAF trial was not designed to evaluate mechanisms and outcomes that the NIN model suggested. Data on inflammation and neural activity were collected post hoc, many years after the intervention concluded. Thus these findings must be regarded as preliminary until a more rigorous study is performed with pretest and posttest measures of NIN processes. The proposed prevention trial of SAAF (N = 325) is designed to meet this need.
Our specific aims are to test hypotheses regarding:
- the influence of participation in SAAF on change in NIN-associated risk markers (neural circuitry subserving threat, reward, and executive control, as well as peripheral inflammation) across 2 years;
- the mediating role of protective parenting in linking intervention participation to NIN-associated risk markers;
- the influence of participation in SAAF on change in addictive behavior vulnerabilities associated with risky decision making, emotion regulation, early-onset substance use, unhealthy eating, and cardiometabolic risk markers; and
- the mediational chain linking SAAF to addictive behavior vulnerabilities via changes in parenting and NIN-associated risk markers.
A sample of 325 African American youth and their primary caregivers will be recruited from Athens, GA and surrounding areas. Inclusion criteria are (a) youth or parent self-designates as African American, Black, or biracial (including Black or African American), and (b) youth is in 5th grade and 10-13 years of age. Exclusion criteria include: (a) contraindications for MRI scanning (e.g., metal in body, traumatic brain injury, claustrophobia, pregnancy), (b) youth with chronic illnesses or medication regimens that would affect inflammatory panels (e.g., diabetes, congenital heart disease, asthma, cancers), and (c) parent or youth conditions (e.g., ADHD, psychoses) that would prevent participation in the SAAF intervention. Given the nonverbal nature of fMRI tasks, left-handed youth are not excluded. The investigators anticipate screening ~615 families over a 2.5-year period to obtain a sample of 325 families. Eligible participants will be scheduled for an assessment at UGA's Bioimaging Research Center. Youth will participate in a scan (~60 minutes), a blood draw, and youth and parents will complete self-report measures. At each data collection wave, parents consent in writing to their own and their children's participation and children provide written assent. At W2, a home visit is made with laptop computers to collect self-report data. After pretest, families will be assigned randomly to SAAF or control. Control families receive written information by mail regarding adolescent development.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Heather Zuercher, MPH
- Phone Number: 706-425-2992
- Email: zuercher@uga.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Cara Hodge, BS
- Phone Number: 706-425-2992
- Email: thodge@uga.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Athens, Georgia, United States, 30602
- Recruiting
- Center for Family Research
-
Contact:
- Cara Hodge, BS
- Phone Number: 706-425-2992
- Email: thodge@uga.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Youth:
- Self reported African American or Black;
- Age 10-13
Parents:
- Primary caregiver for youth,
- Resides in same household as youth.
Exclusion Criteria:
Youth :
- Contraindications for MRI scanning (e.g., metal in body, traumatic brain injury, claustrophobia, pregnancy),
- Youth with chronic illnesses or medication regimens that would affect inflammatory panels (e.g., diabetes, congenital heart disease, asthma, cancers).
Parent:
- Conditions (e.g., severe disability, psychoses) that would prevent participation in the SAAF intervention or completing self-report measures.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: SAAF Intervention
Parents and youth will receive an online, family-centered intervention consisting of 7 weekly sessions.
|
A 7 session online intervention designed to augment protective processes associated with deterrence of substance use
|
Other: Control Group
Control group members will receive a book entitled, Parenting for Liberation: A Guide for Raising Black Children
|
Parents will receive a copy of the book, Parenting for Liberation: A Guide for Raising Black Children
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Self-regulation (youth report)
Time Frame: Two years
|
Youth will complete the the Future-oriented Goals scale and Will's Self-Control scale.
We will standardize scores from these two measures (mean =0, standard deviation =1) then average them together.
We expect assignment to SAAF vs control to be associated with higher scores (more self-regulation).
|
Two years
|
Self-regulation (parent report)
Time Frame: Two years
|
Parents will complete a 12 item scale (Humphrey's self control scale) about their youth.
Items will be summed ranging from 0-36.
We expect assignment to SAAF vs control to be associated with higher scores (more self-regulation).
|
Two years
|
Tolerance for Deviance Scale
Time Frame: Two years
|
Youth will complete the Tolerance for Deviance scale.
19 Items are summed, ranging from 0-57.
We expect assignment to SAAF vs Control to be associated with lower scores (reductions in risky attitudes).
|
Two years
|
Reward-based eating
Time Frame: Two years
|
Youth will complete the 13 items Reward Based Eating Drive scale.
Scores range from 13-65.
SAAF youth are expected to have lower scores on reward based eating compared to control youth.
|
Two years
|
Substance use onset
Time Frame: Two years
|
Lifetime use (yes or no) of alcohol, marijuana, or cigarettes per youth self-report.
We will sum the items to form a composite onset index.
We expect youth assigned to SAAF to report less substance use onset than youth assigned to control.
|
Two years
|
Past 3 month substance use frequency
Time Frame: Two years
|
Youth complete likert type items assessing alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine use in the past 3 months.
Items are standardized and summed to form a substance use composite.
We expect youth assigned to SAAF to report less substance use than youth assigned to control.
|
Two years
|
Unhealthy eating
Time Frame: Two Years
|
Youth will complete the Adolescent Food Habits checklist.
Items are summed.
We expect SAAF youth to engage in less unhealthy eating than control youth.
|
Two Years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Involved Vigilant Parenting Scale (youth report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Youth report on the 17 item Involved Vigilant Parenting scale.
Items are summed to indicate higher scores on effective parenting, ranging from 17-85.
We expect SAAF youth to report more involved vigilant parenting than control youth.
|
1 year
|
Involved Vigilant Parenting (parent report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Parents report on the 17 item Involved Vigilant Parenting scale.
Items are summed to indicate higher scores on effective parenting, ranging from 17-85.
We expect SAAF parents to report more involved vigilant parenting than control parents.
|
1 year
|
Cultural socialization (youth report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Youth report on the cultural socialization subscale of the Racial Socialization Scale.
Five items (range is 5-25) are summed to indicate higher scores on cultural socialization.
We expect SAAF youth to report more cultural socialization than control youth.
|
1 year
|
Cultural socialization (parent report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Caregivers report on the cultural socialization subscale of the Racial Socialization Scale.
Five items (range is 5-25) are summed to indicate higher scores on cultural socialization.
We expect SAAF parents to report more cultural socialization than control parents.
|
1 year
|
Communication about Risk Behavior (youth report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Youth report on Discussion Quality scale.
Three items are summed to indicate higher scores on communication (range 0-12).
We expect SAAF youth to report more harmonious communication than control youth.
|
1 year
|
Communication about risk behavior (parent report)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Parents report on the Discussion Quality scale.
Three items are summed to indicate higher scores on communication (range 0-12).
We expect SAAF parents to report more harmonious communication than control parents.
|
1 year
|
Threat sensitivity via functional MRI assessment
Time Frame: Two years
|
Threat sensitivity is assessed via amygdalar activity during a threat paradigm.
We expect assignment to SAAF to be associated with diminished amygdalar reactivity to threat stimuli.
|
Two years
|
Executive control assessed via functional MRI assessment
Time Frame: Two years
|
We will use multivariate autoregressive modeling to generate parameter estimates of functional connectivity within cortico-amygdalar and cortico-striatal circuitry during the reward task.
We focus on a seed-to-seed association between the orbital frontal cortext (OFC) and the ventral striatum (VS).
Here, a positive (i.e., > 0) parameter estimate reflects strong executive control over the VS during reward processing.
Conversely, a negative parameter estimate (i.e., < 0) suggests the youth is engaging the OFC in a manner that down-regulates sub-cortical reward processing.
|
Two years
|
Reward sensitivity via functional MRI assessment
Time Frame: Two years
|
Neural activity associated with processing rewarding stimuli using fMRI data.
We predict that assignment to SAAF will reduce deficits in reward sensitivity as assessed by ventral striatum activity during a reward task.
|
Two years
|
Peripheral inflammation composite score
Time Frame: Two years
|
Inflammatory signaling is assessed via a composite measure of circulating cytokines (Interleukin [IL]-6, 8, 10, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Per past research, we will standardize the values for each biomarker and then sum them to form a composite score ranging from 0-5.
A higher score on this composite reflects more low-grade inflammation.
|
Two years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gene H Brody, Ph.D., University of Georgia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PROJECT00003530
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Substance Use
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Cannabis Use | Alcohol Use, UnspecifiedUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use Disorder | Cocaine Use DisorderUnited States
-
Woebot HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Stanford UniversityCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
Woebot HealthStanford UniversityCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Substance DependenceUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Georgia Institute of Technology; CUNYCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Substance Abuse, Intravenous | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid Use | Substance Abuse | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder, Severe | Substance WithdrawalUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Opioid Use | Drug Use | Substance MisuseUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Missouri, St. LouisCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use DisorderCanada
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Substance AbuseTurkey
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedPTSD | Alcohol Use Disorders | Substance Use DisordersUnited States
Clinical Trials on SAAF
-
University of GeorgiaCompletedSAAF-T | FUEL for Families
-
University of GeorgiaCompletedAdolescent Alcohol Use