- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04505111
Prehabilitation Plus ERAS vs ERAS in Gynecological Surgery
Prehabilitation Plus Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Gynecological Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Prospective, interventionist and randomized controlled trial in a 1: 1 ratio, open to the multidisciplinary team but blind to surgeons and anaesthesiologists. The aim is to test the effectiveness of a multimodal prehabilitation protocol in patients with diagnosed or suspicious gynaecological cancer, who will undergo gynaecological surgery.
The multidisciplinary prehabilitation program will be applied to the intervention group. For the group participating in the prehabilitation and for the control group, the protocol and specific recommendations for gynecological cancer defined by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines will be applied.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sao Paulo
-
São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 03102-002
- IBCC - Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who sign the Informed Consent Form, indicating that they understand the study procedures and their purpose;
- Women aged between 18 and 80 years old;
- Gynecological surgery performed by laparotomy;
- Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of at least 2 (ECOG ≤2);
- Preoperative schedule that allows prehabilitation intervention for 2 to 3 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under 18 or older than 80 years old;
- ECOG ≥3;
- Significant comorbidities, such as: neurological or musculoskeletal disorder, heart disease and / or respiratory failure that prohibit physical exercise;
- Limitation of locomotion preventing the patient to perform physical exercises;
- Cognitive deterioration or patients with psychiatric disorder that prevents adherence to the program;
- Emergency or urgency surgeries;
- Surgeries by minimally invasive approach (laparoscopy or robotics);
- Vulvectomy or soft tissue surgery without abdominal approach;
- Minor gynaecological surgeries such as conizations;
- Surgeries performed together with other specialties, in which the gynecology team is not primarily responsible for postoperative care;
- Non-adherence of the patient in the intervention group to the preoperative prehabilitation program.
- If surgery is performed 21 days after the last day of the prehabilitation program, for any reason
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Prehabilitation + Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Patients allocated to the intervention group will undergo prehabilitation protocol (nutrition + exercise + psychological counselling), with individualized monitoring by the multidisciplinary team.
|
Prehabilitation Program (nutrition + exercise + psychological counseling) + ERAS protocol
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Patients allocated to the control group will not undergo any pre-surgical intervention, except for preoperative counselling, already implicated in ERAS®.
|
ERAS protocol
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative recovery time
Time Frame: Up to 30 postoperative days
|
Postoperative day patient is ready for discharge, defined as the day the patient has the ability to walk alone, take care of herself, and ingest at least 75% of the daily caloric needs
|
Up to 30 postoperative days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: Up to 30 postoperative days
|
Clavien-Dindo Classification, Grades I-V
|
Up to 30 postoperative days
|
|
Readmissions
Time Frame: Up to 30 postoperative days
|
Readmission to the Hospital Facilities
|
Up to 30 postoperative days
|
|
Intensive Care Unit admission rates
Time Frame: Up to 30 postoperative days
|
Postoperative Intensive Care Unit admission and stay
|
Up to 30 postoperative days
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: At Baseline, then at 30 and 60 days postoperatively
|
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
|
At Baseline, then at 30 and 60 days postoperatively
|
|
Compliance to the ERAS® program guidelines
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Compliance to ERAS® protocol and implementation of the program
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Changes in anxiety and depression from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
Changes in anxiety and depression will be examined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Scores for each sub scale (depression and anxiety) are summed-up and range from 0 to 21.
Values from 0-7 indicate normal levels, 8-10 are border values and values from 11-21 are considered to be pathological.
|
Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
|
Changes in functional capacity from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
Patients will perform a 6-Minute Walk Test
|
Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
|
Change in muscle strength
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
Muscle strength is measured by using an dynamometer
|
Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
|
Change in body mass
Time Frame: Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
Body mass is measured by using a bioelectrical impedance analysis
|
Baseline and postoperatively at 30 and 60 days
|
|
Hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
|
Days from surgical procedure to hospital discharge
|
Up to 30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andre Lopes, MD, doctor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Roca J, Lacy AM, Burgos F, Risco R, Momblan D, Balust J, Blanco I, Martinez-Palli G. Personalised Prehabilitation in High-risk Patients Undergoing Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):50-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002293.
- Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Achtari C, Antrobus J, Huang J, Scott M, Wijk L, Acheson N, Ljungqvist O, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations--Part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 18. No abstract available.
- Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Achtari C, Antrobus J, Huang J, Scott M, Wijk L, Acheson N, Ljungqvist O, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations--Part II. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):323-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Jan 3. No abstract available.
- Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA, Taylor JS, Iniesta M, Lasala J, Mena G, Scott M, Gillis C, Elias K, Wijk L, Huang J, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May;29(4):651-668. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
- Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, Awasthi R, Augustin B, Gamsa A, Liberman AS, Stein B, Charlebois P, Feldman LS, Carli F. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):937-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393.
- Santa Mina D, Clarke H, Ritvo P, Leung YW, Matthew AG, Katz J, Trachtenberg J, Alibhai SM. Effect of total-body prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
- Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003.
- Iyer R, Gentry-Maharaj A, Nordin A, Burnell M, Liston R, Manchanda R, Das N, Desai R, Gornall R, Beardmore-Gray A, Nevin J, Hillaby K, Leeson S, Linder A, Lopes A, Meechan D, Mould T, Varkey S, Olaitan A, Rufford B, Ryan A, Shanbhag S, Thackeray A, Wood N, Reynolds K, Menon U. Predictors of complications in gynaecological oncological surgery: a prospective multicentre study (UKGOSOC-UK gynaecological oncology surgical outcomes and complications). Br J Cancer. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):475-84. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.630. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
- Miralpeix E, Mancebo G, Gayete S, Corcoy M, Sole-Sedeno JM. Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Oct;29(8):1235-1243. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000597. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 08304219.8.0000.0072
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.