PENG Block for Arthroscopic Hip Surgery (PENG)

March 9, 2022 updated by: Peter Amato, MD, University of Virginia

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Arthroscopic Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial seeks to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group block in the setting of outpatient hip arthroscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The pericapsular nerve group, or PENG block, has been recently described and shows promise in providing analgesia to the hip joint. The analgesic value of this block in the setting of hip arthroscopy is unknown. This study aims to compare a preoperative PENG block to placebo block prior to outpatient hip arthroscopy under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is immediate postoperative pain as measured by numerical rating score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, opioid-related adverse events, patient satisfaction, chronic opioid usage, and pain scores at other time points.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
        • UVA Outpatient Surgery Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years old undergoing unilateral hip arthroscopy at the outpatient surgery center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate
  • < 18 yo
  • Chronic opioid use
  • localized infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Preop PENG Block
Patients will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block with 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine in a manner consistent with Girón-Arango et al 2018 (PMID:30063657). Using appropriate sterile precautions, and procedural sedation with up to 2 mg IV midazolam, an ultrasound (SonoSite S-Nerve or Export) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz), or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) is used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, iliopubic eminence, and psoas muscle. After skin localization with 1-2 mL 1% lidocaine, a 22g 80 mm echogenic block needle (Pajunk SonoBlock II Facet) is advanced lateral to medial, in plane with the ultrasound beam, beneath the psoas tendon to the iliopubic eminence. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine is injected beneath the psoas tendon and above the iliopubic eminence, in 5 mL increments with periodic aspiration to prevent intravascular injection. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site wiped clean.
Ultrasound-guided injection of 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine according to the method described by Giron-Arango L in 2018. A needle is inserted at the inguinal level under ultrasound guidance to pass beneath the psoas tendon on top of the iliopubic eminence where the local anesthetic is injected.
Other Names:
  • Pericapsular nerve group block
20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected for the preop PENG block
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients in the placebo group will receive a subcutaneous injection of 5 mL 0.9% normal saline. Using appropriate sterile precautions, and procedural sedation with up to 2 mg IV midazolam, an ultrasound (SonoSite S-Nerve or Export) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz), or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) is used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, iliopubic eminence, and psoas muscle. After skin localization with 1-2 mL 1% lidocaine, a 22g 80 mm echogenic block needle (Pajunk SonoBlock II Facet) is advanced lateral to medial, in plane with the ultrasound beam, 1-2 cm beneath the skin, remaining in the subcutaneous tissue. 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline is injected, with periodic aspiration to prevent intravascular injection. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site wiped clean.
Ultrasound-guided placebo injection of 5 mL 0.9% normal saline. Using the same landmarks as for the PENG group, a needle is inserted in the inguinal region under ultrasound guidance, whereby a subcutaneous injection of 5 mL of 0.9% saline is made.
5 mL 0.9% Normal saline will be injected for the Placebo block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PACU pain score
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes of emergence from anesthesia.
Maximum pain score within the first 30 minutes after emergence in the post-anesthesia care unit. Pain will be assessed by numerical rating score (0-10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst possible pain).
Within 30 minutes of emergence from anesthesia.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PACU opioid consumption
Time Frame: Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (typically 2 hours).
Total morphine milligram equivalents required by patients in the post-anesthesia care unit, prior to discharge from the outpatient surgery center. Following emergence from anesthesia, pain will be assessed in regular intervals, with administration of IV and oral opioids according to numeric rating scale and clinical assessment. Opioid administration stops when patient numerical rating score is <4, when patient endorses manageable pain level, when side effects of opioids are intolerable, or for other concerning clinical conditions as determined by the anesthesiologist of record.
Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (typically 2 hours).
Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (typically 2 hours).
This is a yes/no binary outcome measure defined by administration of any antiemetic drug in the post-anesthesia care unit.
Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (typically 2 hours).
Patient satisfaction with analgesia
Time Frame: Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours and 48-hours.
Patients will be called at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively. They will be asked during each call if they are satisfied with their pain control (binary - yes or no).
Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours and 48-hours.
Postoperative opioid utilization
Time Frame: Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postoperatively
Cumulative postoperative opioid consumption expressed in morphine milligram equivalents
Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postoperatively
Postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postoperatively
Postoperative numerical rating scores after discharge (0-10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst possible pain).
Determined through follow-up calls at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter E Amato, MD, University of Virginia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Preop PENG block

3
Subscribe