Comparison of the Effect of Intra Articular Steroid Injection and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Osteoarthritis

April 2, 2023 updated by: Selin Guven Kose, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Intra-articular Steroid Injection and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) in Patients With Chronic Hip Pain

The most common cause of hip joint dysfunction in the elderly is degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip. Innervation of the hip joint capsule is provided by the obturator nerve, the accessory obturator nerve, and the femoral nerve. With pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), by blocking the femoral nerve and the accessory obturator nerve, analgesia is successfully provided for the hip joint. Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids; It is used as an alternative to surgical interventions because it reduces inflammation and short-term pain and is a minimally invasive method. The investigators aim to compare and report patients who underwent ultrasound-guided intra-articular steroid injection and PENG block in terms of post-procedural pain scores and patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06110
        • Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hip pain NRS > 4
  • No pathologies in the laboratory and coagulation parameters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatological disease with hip involvement
  • Systemic active infection
  • Malignancy
  • History of hip joint surgery
  • History of traumatic hip injury
  • Platelets values < 150.000 / µl
  • History of bleeding disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intraarticular injection
intra-articular steroid injection with the ultrasound guidance technique,
Ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection
Active Comparator: peng block
Ultrasound guided drug injection between to iliopubic eminentia and psoas tendon
Ultrasound-guided PENG block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score
Time Frame: change from baseline to day 1, week 2, 4, 8 after the block
The 11-point NRS consists of numbers between 0 and 10 where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "maximum pain." The patient is instructed to identify one number between 0 and 10, which is best representative of their pain intensity.
change from baseline to day 1, week 2, 4, 8 after the block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (WOMAC)
Time Frame: baseline to 8 weeks
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered health status measure and consists of 24 items divided into three domains, which are pain, stiffness, and physical function, validated to patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis
baseline to 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: baseline to 8 weeks
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint-specific measure, and it consists of two sections: questions and a physical examination, including a range of motion and deformity items. The score has a maximum of 100 points with a maximum of 44 points for pain, 47 for function, 4 points for absence of deformity, and 5 points for a range of motion. The highest score of 100 points indicates the best function and no pain.
baseline to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: selin guven kose, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 84/18

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on intraarticular injection

Subscribe