Efficacy of a Dementia Family Caregiver Support Intervention in Vietnam

March 10, 2025 updated by: University of California, Davis

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of a Psychosocial Intervention (REACH VN) to Support Alzheimer's Family Caregivers in Vietnam

This is a cluster randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a psychosocial intervention to support family caregivers of persons living with dementia in Vietnam.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a psychosocial intervention to support Alzheimer's family caregivers in Vietnam. The cluster RCT will test the hypothesis that family caregivers who receive the intervention will show lower psychological distress and lower caregiver burden compared with those in the control group (primary outcomes). In addition, we will conduct secondary analyses to examine whether the intervention group has lower perceived stress and somatic symptoms. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to determine if intervention effects are mediated by caregiver self-efficacy or knowledge gain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hanoi, Vietnam
        • Vietnam National Geriatric Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be eligible for the cluster RCT, the family member will need to be the identified adult (age 18 and above) primary caregiver (i.e. the person spending who provides the most time day-to-day providing care) to an older adult with dementia who is living in the community. In the event that the primary caregiver is not available to participate, an alternate family member who provides substantial care (i.e., at least 4 hours/day) to the older adult with dementia will be eligible.
  • Caregivers will need to score ≥ 6 on the Zarit Burden Inventory 4-item version.
  • All participants will be living in designated clusters in Hai Duong, Vietnam.
  • To be eligible, clusters will have a minimum of 5 participants and a maximum of 15 participants. Clusters will be defined as geographic areas serving local health stations.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Significant cognitive impairment or sensory deficit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: REACH VN
A multi-component behavioral intervention to support family caregivers of persons with dementia. Participants will receive 4-6 sessions in-person or by phone over the course of 2-3 months.
4-6 sessions delivered over the course of 2-3 months.
Placebo Comparator: Enhanced control
A single session focused on education about the nature of dementia.
A single session providing education about dementia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12)
Time Frame: Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
The Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) asked caregivers to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) how often they have experienced feelings of burden or stress related to caregiving (total score range: 0-48). A higher score indicates a higher feel of burden.
Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)
Time Frame: Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) asked caregivers to rate on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) how often they have been bothered by symptoms (e.g., feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge) over the past two weeks (total score range: 0-12). A higher score indicates a higher severity.
Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Time Frame: Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
In the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), caregivers were asked to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often) how often they have felt a certain way (e.g., been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly) within the past month (total score range: 0-40). A higher sore indicates a higher perceived stress.
Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)
Time Frame: Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months
In the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), caregivers were asked to rate on a 3-point scale (0 = not bothered at all, 1 = bothered a little, 2 = bothered a lot) how much they have been bothered by somatic symptoms (e.g., stomach pain, headaches) during the past seven days (total score range: 0-30). A higher score indicates a greater severity.
Baseline period at month 0, follow up period at 3 months, and follow up period at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1574137
  • R01AG064688 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • TR001860 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on REACH VN

Subscribe