Outcomes of a Trifocal IOL in Post-refractive Patients (TrIPLe)

October 15, 2020 updated by: Vance Thompson Vision ND
To compare the prediction error of ORA vs formula for post-LASIK cataract patients when PanOptix IOL was implanted. Using post-operative outcomes to determine if preoperative IOL calculations, including Barrett TK, Barrett Universal II, Hill RBF, ASCRS post-refractive calculator, or intraoperative aberrometry is more accurate when the two methods disagree in patients who have had previous refractive surgery undergo cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will be non-interventional with data being collected prospectively and retrospectively between at least two surgical sites. All subjects will have previous LASIK and be at least 3 months post op PanOptix implantation. The study will enroll up to 200 patients and a statistical database will be created.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Charts from up to 200 myopic post-refractive patients who have received PanOptix will be reviewed at at least two Vance Thompson Vision sites (Fargo, ND and Sioux Falls, SD). All patients will have had ORA used during the cataract surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous myopic refractive surgery
  • At least 3 months post op cataract surgery with a trifocal IOL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing or subsequent eye condition that interferes with accurate data collection (retinal detachment, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Post-refractive trifocal IOL
Trifocal IOL with ORA in post refractive patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine if preoperative IOL calculations or intraoperative aberrometry is more accurate when the two methods disagree in patients who have had previous refractive surgery undergo cataract surgery.
Time Frame: Pre-op to 9 month visit
  1. Percentage of eyes within +/- .5D of target for each formula and ORA.
  2. Overall % of eyes that have a disagreement between the two methods
Pre-op to 9 month visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative monocular visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Monocular Uncorrected Distance, Intermediate, Near Visual Acuity
3 to 9 month visit
Post-operative best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Manifest refraction, Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity, Distance Corrected Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuity
3 to 9 month visit
Post-operative uncorrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Binocular Uncorrected Distance, Intermediate, Near Visual Acuity, Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity, Distance Corrected Intermediate, Near Visual Acuity
3 to 9 month visit
Post-operative visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Percentage of eyes with Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity of 20/20 or better, 20/25 or better, and 20/30 or better
3 to 9 month visit
Post-operative visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Percentage of eyes with Uncorrected Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity and Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity 20/20 or better, 20/25 or better, and 20/30 or better
3 to 9 month visit
Post-operative visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Percentage of eyes with Uncorrected Distance Near Visual Acuity and Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity of 20/20 or better, 20/25 or better, and 20/30 or better
3 to 9 month visit
Patient's quality of vision and reported side-effects
Time Frame: 3 to 9 month visit
Patient satisfaction questionnaire
3 to 9 month visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Greenwood, MD, Vance Thompson Vision ND

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IOL-VTV-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on PanOptix

Subscribe