Expanding Donor Pool for Live Donor Liver Transplantation: Utilization of Donors With NASH After Optimization

September 26, 2020 updated by: Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease, predominantly in the East, where deceased donor liver transplantation is sparse. In LDLT, donor selection has to be stringent; as the donor safety is thepriority. Live liver donors (LLD) with complex biliary and vascular anatomy are increasingly being accepted for donation with the betterment of technical expertise. One of the commonest reasons for LLD rejection is the hepatic parenchymal abnormality because ofsteatosis and steatohepatitis, which can increase the donor risk. Retrospective analysis of donors with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) who were optimized and taken up for major hepatectomy from June 2011 to January 2018will be performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Design Aim and Objective -

  • Primary objective:
  • To study the effect of donor optimization protocol in donors with biopsy proven NASH
  • To study thebiochemical (LFTSs & INR) recovery in donors with NASH after major hepatectomy
  • To compare their biochemical recovery parameters (LFTs & INR) with that of non NASH donors.
  • Secondary objectives:
  • To study incidence of NASH among live liver donors
  • To study their respective recipients' outcomes
  • To study the morbidity among LLDs with NASH after major hepatectomy

Methodology:

  • Study population:Patients underwentLDLT from June 2011 to January 2019 at Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi
  • Study design:Retrospective study
  • Study period:from June 2011 to January 2019
  • Sample size with justification:All consecutive LLDs with at least one year of follow up post-operatively
  • Intervention: none
  • Monitoring and assessment:none Statistical Analysis:Categorical variables were presented as number (percentage) and were compared using the Chi-square test. Continuous variables were presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) and were compared using Mann-Whitney U Test.

Adverse Effects: None Stopping Rule of Study: None

Expected Outcome of the Project: Adherence to a strict dietary and lifestyle modifications plan will cause histological reversal of NASH and fibrosis in LLDs. Their clinical and biochemical recovery following the major hepatectomy will be similar to that of non-NASH LLDs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

410

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients underwent LDLT from June 2011 to January 2019 at Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Live Liver Donors who had undergone major hepatectomy (removal of ≥ 3 liver segments)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Live Liver Donors who had undergone minor hepatectomy (removal of < 3 liver segments)
  2. Live Liver Donors of recipients with acute liver failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Donors with NASH
Donors with NASH underwent donor optimization protocol
No Intervention
Donors without NASH
No Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effect of donor optimization protocol on body weight in donors with biopsy proven NASH
Time Frame: 6 weeks to 3 months
6 weeks to 3 months
Effect of donor optimization protocol on liver attenuation index in donor with biopsy proven NASH.
Time Frame: 6 weeks to 3 months
6 weeks to 3 months
Effect of donor optimization protocol on lipid profile in donors with biopsy proven NASH.
Time Frame: 6 weeks to 3 months
6 weeks to 3 months
Effect of donor optimization protocol on Liver Function Test in donors with biopsy proven NASH.
Time Frame: 6 weeks to 3 months
6 weeks to 3 months
Improvement in Liver Function Test in donors with NASH after major hepatectomy.
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 7
Day 0 to Day 7
Improvement in Coagulation Profile in donors with NASH after major hepatectomy.
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 7
Day 0 to Day 7
Improvement in Liver Function Test between both the groups
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 7
Day 0 to Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of NASH among live liver donors
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Morbidity among Live Liver Donors with NASH after major hepatectomy
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 30
Day 0 to Day 30
Post Operative complications of recipients in both the groups
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 30
Day 0 to day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ILBS-LIVEDONORS-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe