A Study of mDOT for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

February 6, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Pilot Study of mDOT for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

In solid organ transplant recipients, poor adherence to immunosuppressant medications carries the risk of graft rejection (needing a new transplant), post-transplant complications, and increased healthcare costs. Additionally, nonadherence to immunosuppressant medications is imperative to short- and long-term outcomes. The rate of nonadherence in this population varies vastly. Because of lacking objective and accurate nonadherence measurements, both to immunosuppressant drugs and medical indications, the true implications and prevalence of nonadherence is not yet well understood. Therefore, investigators believe that mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to allow clinicians and researchers to more comprehensively address and understand nonadherence in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized control trial to compare medication adherence among liver and kidney transplant patients who use the mHealth system against controls who do not.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. STUDY OBJECTIVES 1.1 Primary Objective To compare medication adherence of solid organ transplant recipients, specifically liver and kidney transplants, using the mobile DOT (mDOT) application (i.e., intervention) to those who did not use the mDOT application (i.e., control). The investigators will compare medication adherence between intervention and control arms using the Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI), a validated measure of adherence derived from the standard deviation of measured drug levels (22-23).

    1.2 Secondary Objectives

    • Clinical endpoints including rejection and hospitalization
    • Patient reported adherence on immunosuppressant therapy instrument (ITAS)
    • Patient-reported QoL outcomes as measured by PedsQL and SF-36
    • Patient-reported self-efficacy using the Riekert Self-efficacy scale
    • Patient-reported usability using the PSSUQ (treatment arm only)
    • To examine the patterns of medication adherence in transplant recipients in both groups to better understand baseline medication adherence
    • To understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing such a system into the clinical workflow and patient follow-up care management
  2. BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE In adolescent and adult solid organ transplant recipients, poor adherence to immunosuppressant medications carries the risk of graft rejection, short- and long-term post-transplant complications, and increased healthcare costs (1-8). In transplant recipients, adherence to immunosuppressive drugs, as well as general medical indications is imperative to overall outcomes (9). The rate of non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in transplant patients varies vastly, with reports ranging from 15-40% in adults and much higher at 50-70% among adolescents (9-14). Additionally, medication adherence is a key concern in the transition from adolescent to adult-centered transplant care, and transition planning should be prioritized in these transplant patients (15-18). Because of lacking objective and accurate non-adherence measurements, both to immunosuppressive drugs and medical indications, the true implications and prevalence of non-adherence is not yet well understood (19-21). Therefore, the investigators believe that mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to allow clinicians and researchers to more comprehensively address and understand non-adherence in adolescent and adult transplant recipients.

    emocha Mobile Health Inc. has developed an application that enables users to track dose-by-dose medication adherence through asynchronous, video directly observed therapy (DOT). This helps patients take medications as prescribed and gives providers the assurance that the patients are supported and successful in treatment. DOT is the practice of watching a patient take every dose of medicine in-person, and has typically only been done in extreme cases because it can be both costly and burdensome: DOT is the standard of care for Tuberculosis treatment and has proven high-adherence rates. Through mHealth technology, DOT can be used more broadly and without added burden; emocha's technology allows this through enabling patients to use the mobile application to view the regimen, record themselves taking every dose of the participant's medication, report side effects or symptoms, visualize treatment progress, and access educational content. This information is encrypted and transmitted to a HIPAA-secure web portal for providers to review. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized control trial to compare medication adherence between patients who use the mHealth system against controls who do not.

    Emocha has formally evaluated the mDOT platform across several disease states: tuberculosis, Hepatitis C virus, and opioid use disorder. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognizes emocha's video modality as an acceptable form of DOT, according to the latest guidelines. To date, emocha has partnered with Johns Hopkins and three Maryland health department tuberculosis programs to assess quantitative, qualitative, and cost outcomes associated with emocha video DOT implementation. Among all participants - with more than 1,400 videos submitted thus far - mean patient adherence was 94 percent (median adherence 96 percent, interquartile range 93 to 100 percent). Similar adherence rates were proven in independent studies using emocha performed by Harris County, TX and the Puerto Rico Department of Health. Additionally, emocha is conducting a trial on the feasibility of video DOT for patients undergoing the initiation phase of buprenorphine treatment through office-based opioid treatment programs, as well as conducting ongoing research on Hepatitis C medication adherence among injection drug users.

  3. STUDY DESIGN The purpose of this study is to understand how the use of an mHealth application, mDOT, changes medication adherence behaviors among liver or kidney transplant recipients. For the purpose of this research, the mobile app is a device of non-significant risk and exempt from the IDE requirement. emocha Mobile Health is the device manufacturer.

In this multi-center study, patients >/= 13 years of age who receive a liver or kidney transplant at Johns Hopkins Hospital, University of Virginia Medical Center or University of Miami Medical Center will be recruited to participate in this randomized control trial (RCT). There will be 2 arms participants may be randomly assigned to: intervention and control arms. Participants in the intervention arm will receive the mDOT application, and participants in the control arm will not. Both arms will still receive standard of care post-transplant.

Participants are followed for compliance with standard of care recommendations. No additional care or procedures will be administered to study participants. Given the uncertainty in whether this mHealth intervention will improve rates of immunosuppression medication adherence in liver and kidney transplant recipients, a non-treatment group is necessary in order to identify whether an advantage exists.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study:

> 13 years old Own a smart phone and are willing to receive information through it Received a liver or kidney transplant at a participating study site during or prior to the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

All candidates meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation:

Patients with cognitive impairments will not be eligible for enrollment due to inability to provide informed consent.

Inability or unwillingness of individual or legal guardian/representative to give consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: mHealth intervention
Subjects will receive mHealth direct observation of therapy for 12 weeks
Placebo Comparator: standard of care
post-transplant standard of care
Subjects will receive standard of care observation for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Adherence Via Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI)
Time Frame: 3 months
To compare medication adherence of solid organ transplant recipients, specifically liver and kidney transplants, using the mobile DOT (mDOT) application (i.e., intervention) to those who did not use the mDOT application (i.e., control). The investigators will compare medication adherence between intervention and control arms using the Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI), a validated measure of adherence derived from the standard deviation of measured drug levels. The investigators will look at the difference in MLVIs between the two solid organ transplant groups. MLVI is the standard deviation of a series of at least three trough blood levels of tacrolimus or sirolimus. Higher MLVI value indicates greater variability in medication levels. MLVI >=2 is suggestive of nonadherence and MLVI <2 suggestive of adherence.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patterns of Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
To examine the patterns of medication adherence in transplant recipients in both groups to better understand baseline medication adherence. We will be doing this by looking at the adherence streaks (number of doses taken over number of doses expected).
12 months
Blood Tacrolimus Levels
Time Frame: 3 months
Clinical endpoint measuring the blood levels of tacrolimus (in ng/ml) that indicate rejection of transplant or not
3 months
Patient Reported Adherence
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient reported adherence depending on their scores from the immunosuppressant therapy instrument (ITAS questionnaire) will be measured. The ITAS is a four-item questionnaire that asks respondents to indicate how often they were non-adherent to immunosuppressant therapy (IST) given a particular circumstance. They are asked how often they: (i) forgot to take their IST medications; (ii) were careless about taking their IST medications; (iii) stopped taking their IST medications because they felt worse; and (iv) missed taking their IST medications for any reason. This is a binary measure where A stands for 0% of the time (none), B stands for 1%-20% of the time, C stands for 21-50% of the time, D stands for greater than 50% of the time. ITAS scores range from 0 to 12; 0 is the lowest score and 12 is the highest score, indicating perfect adherence.
3 months
Patient Reported QoL as Assessed by the PedsQL
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient-reported QoL outcomes as measured by PedsQL to measure quality of life and medication adherence. Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life).
12 months
mHealth Usability Measurement
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient-reported usability measured using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), a 16-item questionnaire that follows a 7-point Likert Scale. The scale starts with 1 (strongly agree) and ends with 7 (strongly disagree). The overall result is calculated by averaging the scores from the 7 points of the scale, for all 16 items. The lower the score, the better the usability and satisfaction. Median likert scale choice is reported. This will be done in the mHealth intervention arm only.
3 months
Provider Workflow as Assessed by Patient Usage of the mDOT App
Time Frame: 12 months
Provider clinical workflow will be measured by evaluating patient usage on the app.
12 months
Patient Reported QoL as Assessed by the SF-36
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient Reported QoL Short Form (SF)-36 to measure quality of life and medication adherence. The scoring is scaled at 0 as the lowest and 100 as the highest. The lower the score, the more disability.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cozumel Pruette, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00257447

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplantation

Clinical Trials on mHealth intervention

Subscribe