Effect of Variance on Error Correction During Coupling

February 25, 2025 updated by: Peter Feys, Hasselt University

Understanding the Effect of Variances on Precision in Predictive Coding When Walking to Music and Metronomes in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis with Progressive Subtypes.

This study is a case-control study, involving persons with progressive multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. The study contains 1 descriptive and 3 experimental sessions. In the descriptive session, participant's clinical motor and cognitive functions are collected. In the first experimental session, participant's beat perception and synchronisation abilities is examined within a finger tapping paradigm. In the following experimental sessions participants synchronsiation abilities is examined during walking paradigms, to music and metronomes, with period and phase auditory manipulations. In the latter twp sessions, apart from outcome measures of synchronization the following will be collected as well: brain activity using EEG recordings, spatio-temporal gait parameters, perceived fatigue, perceived motivation and perceived speed of walking.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Melsbroek, Belgium, 1820
        • National MS Center Melsbroek
      • Overpelt, Belgium, 3900
        • Noorderhart Revalidatie & MS centrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of Multiple sclerosis >1 year, diagnosis of progressive MS,
  • walking speed 0.8-1.2m/s, ability to walk for 6 minutes continuously (canes and rollators are permitted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • relapse 3 months prior to enrollment,
  • cognitive impairment impeding understanding of instructions,
  • beat amusia,
  • deafness,
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: persons with Multiple Sclerosis
The study contains 1 descriptive and 3 experimental sessions. In the descriptive session, participant's clinical motor and cognitive functions are collected. In the first experimental session, participant's beat perception and synchronisation abilities is examined within a finger tapping paradigm. In the following experimental sessions participants synchronsiation abilities is examined during walking paradigms, to music and metronomes, with period and phase auditory manipulations
Experimental: Healthy controls
The study contains 1 descriptive and 3 experimental sessions. In the descriptive session, participant's clinical motor and cognitive functions are collected. In the first experimental session, participant's beat perception and synchronisation abilities is examined within a finger tapping paradigm. In the following experimental sessions participants synchronsiation abilities is examined during walking paradigms, to music and metronomes, with period and phase auditory manipulations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motricity Index of dorsi flexors, knee extensors and hip flexors
Time Frame: baseline
Muscle weakness
baseline
Modified Aschowrth scale Hamstrings, Tricepts Surae, Quadricepts
Time Frame: baseline
Spasticity
baseline
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Time Frame: Baseline
ataxia
Baseline
Dynamic gait index
Time Frame: Baseline
dynamic balance
Baseline
Time up and Go test
Time Frame: Baseline
Balance
Baseline
6 minute walking test
Time Frame: Baseline
gait pattern and endurance
Baseline
Brief repeatable battery of Rao
Time Frame: Baseline
cognitive test
Baseline
Symbol digit mobility test
Time Frame: Baseline
cognitive test
Baseline
Stroop test 0
Time Frame: Baseline
cognitive test
Baseline
MS walking scale -12
Time Frame: Baseline
impact of MS on walking ability
Baseline
Activities-specific balance confidence scale
Time Frame: Baseline
rating of balance confidence in performing activities of daily life
Baseline
Modified fatigue impact scale
Time Frame: baseline
effect of fatigue
baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
determine the levels of anxiety and depression
Baseline
Dual task questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
troubles a person have when performing a dual task during daily activity
Baseline
Perceptual tempo and rhythm judgements
Time Frame: week 1
subjective indications in regards to what the participants hear in terms
week 1
Asynchrony
Time Frame: week 1
timing difference between the tap and the beat
week 1
64 channel EEG measurement
Time Frame: week 1
neural correlates of entrainment
week 1
Resultant Vector Length
Time Frame: week 2
synchronisation consistency
week 2
Resultant Vector Length
Time Frame: week 3
synchronisation consistency
week 3
Relative phase angle
Time Frame: week 2
asynchrony in time to quantify synchronization accuracy (in degrees and in milliseconds respectively)
week 2
Relative phase angle
Time Frame: week 3
asynchrony in time to quantify synchronization accuracy (in degrees and in milliseconds respectively)
week 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cadencce
Time Frame: week 2
number of steps per minute
week 2
Cadencce
Time Frame: week 3
number of steps per minute
week 3
Stride length
Time Frame: week 2
distance between consecutive steps (cm)
week 2
Stride length
Time Frame: week 3
distance between consecutive steps (cm)
week 3
Speed
Time Frame: week 2
gait velocity (m/s)
week 2
Speed
Time Frame: week 3
gait velocity (m/s)
week 3
Double Support
Time Frame: week 2
time that both legs are in contact with the floor (mseconds)
week 2
Double Support
Time Frame: week 3
time that both legs are in contact with the floor (mseconds)
week 3
Perceived cognitive and physical fatigue
Time Frame: week 2
A visual analogue scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived cognitive and physical fatigue levels before and after each experimental walking conditions
week 2
Perceived cognitive and physical fatigue
Time Frame: week 3
A visual analogue scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived cognitive and physical fatigue levels before and after each experimental walking conditions
week 3
Perceived motivation
Time Frame: week 2
A Likert scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived motivation of walking after each experimental walking conditions
week 2
Perceived motivation
Time Frame: week 3
A Likert scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived motivation of walking after each experimental walking conditions
week 3
Perceived walking speed
Time Frame: week 2
A Likert scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived walking speed relative to their usual walking after each experimental walking conditions
week 2
Perceived walking speed
Time Frame: week 3
A Likert scale will be used, and participants will be asked to rate their perceived walking speed relative to their usual walking after each experimental walking conditions
week 3
64 channel EEG measurement (only conducted in 4 PwMS and HC)
Time Frame: week 2
Neural correlates of entrainment
week 2
64 channel EEG measurement (only conducted in 4 PwMS and HC)
Time Frame: week 3
Neural correlates of entrainment
week 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Feys, prof. dr., Hasselt University
  • Study Chair: Lousin Moumdjian, dr., Hasselt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on synchronisation abilities

Subscribe