A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Acne Vulgaris

May 19, 2023 updated by: AnaptysBio, Inc.

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Acne Vulgaris

Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab in Participants with Acne Vulgaris

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imsidolimab in adolescent and adult participants with acne vulgaris (AV). This study also will characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of imsidolimab and explore the immune response to imsidolimab in participants with AV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2J1C4
        • Site 10-115
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
        • Site 10-114
    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
        • Site 10-111
      • Sherman Oaks, California, United States, 91403
        • Site 10-106
    • Florida
      • Sweetwater, Florida, United States, 33172
        • Site 10-113
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • Site 10-108
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
        • Site 10-107
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70119
        • Site 10-109
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70119
        • Site 10-112
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Site 10-104
    • New Hampshire
      • Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States, 03801
        • Site 10-110
    • Tennessee
      • Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States, 37130
        • Site 10-105
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • Site 10-103
      • College Station, Texas, United States, 77845
        • Site 10-102
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78213
        • Site 10-101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe facial AV
  • Facial IGA) score of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe)
  • At least 20 and no more than 100 inflammatory lesions on the face
  • No more than 100 non-inflammatory lesions on the face.
  • No more than 5 nodules (≥5 millimeter [mm]) on the face

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • A participant with acne fulminans or conglobate or secondary acne will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
Participants received imsidolimab 400 milligrams (mg) by subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1, followed by 200 mg on Days 29 and 57.
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody
Other Names:
  • ANB019
Experimental: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
Participants received imsidolimab 200 mg by SC injection on Day 1, followed by 100 mg on Days 29 and 57.
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody
Other Names:
  • ANB019
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received imsidolimab matching placebo by SC injection on Days 1, 29, and 57.
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 20
The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 20
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 20
The number of facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 20
Change From Baseline in Facial Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
The number of facial non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, and chin was counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
The number of facial non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the forehead, left and right cheeks, and chin was counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Change From Baseline in Total Facial Lesion (Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesions) Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
The number of facial inflammatory (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Facial Lesion (Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesions) Counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
The number of facial inflammatory (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin were counted. Baseline was defined as the last available measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Change From Baseline in Facial Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

The Facial IGA was a global assessment that was used to assess the current state of acne vulgaris (AV) on the face at each visit. It is a 5-point morphological assessment ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Clear (0): clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions

Almost Clear (1): A few scattered comedowns and a few small papules

Mild (2): Easily recognizable; less than half the surface is involved. some comedowns and some papules and pustules

Moderate (3): More than half of the surface is involved. Many comedowns, papules, and pustules. One nodule may be present

Severe (4): Entire surface is involved. Covered with comedowns, numerous papules and pustules. Few nodules may be present.

The Facial IGA was an overall global evaluation that was performed at an arm's length distance from the participant and must be performed before the acne lesion count.

Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Facial IGA of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least a 2-grade Decrease From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

The Facial IGA was a global assessment that was used to assess the current state of AV on the face at each visit. It is a 5-point morphological assessment ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Clear (0): clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions

Almost Clear (1): A few scattered comedowns and a few small papules

Mild (2): Easily recognizable; less than half the surface is involved. some comedowns and some papules and pustules

Moderate (3): More than half of the surface is involved. Many comedowns, papules, and pustules. One nodule may be present

Severe (4): Entire surface is involved. Covered with comedowns, numerous papules and pustules. Few nodules may be present.

The Facial IGA was an overall global evaluation that was performed at an arm's length distance from the participant and must be performed before the acne lesion count.

Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Percentage of Participants in Each Response Category for the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

PGI- S was a single-item question, which asks the participant to rate the current severity of AV. The response options were:

Clear Skin (1)

Mild (2)

Moderate (3)

Severe (4)

Higher score indicated more severity.

Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Percentage of Participants in Each Response Category for the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20

PGI-C was a single-item, self-administered questionnaire, which asked the participant to rate the change in their symptom severity. Scores ranged from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse).

Very much better (1)

Much better (2)

A little better (3)

No change (4)

A little worse (5)

Much worse (6)

Very much worse (7)

Higher score indicated more severity.

Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire (DLQI) Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
DLQI was a simple 10-question validated questionnaire, each question was scored from 0 (not relevant/not at all) to 3 (very much). The DLQI total score ranged from 0 (no effect on participant's life) to 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life). The aim of this participant-reported questionnaire was to measure how much the skin condition had affected the participant's quality of life. The DLQI was administered to participants ≥ 16 years of age. Participants were administered the same questionnaire during the entire study based on their age at Day 1.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
CDLQI was a simple 10-question validated questionnaire, each question was scored from 0 (not relevant/not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI total score ranged from 0 (no effect on participant's life) to 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life). The aim of this participant-reported questionnaire was to measure how much the skin condition had affected the participant's quality of life. The CDLQI was administered to participants < 16 years of age. Participants were administered the same questionnaire during the entire study based on their age at Day 1.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: First dose of study drug until end of study (up to 20 weeks)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study treatment that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE was considered "serious" if it resulted in death, life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, other important medical events. TEAE was defined as a new event that occurred during or after first dose of study treatment or any event present at baseline that worsens in either intensity or frequency after first dose of study treatment.
First dose of study drug until end of study (up to 20 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bruce Randazzo, MD, AnaptysBio, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ANB019-209

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe