The Compatibility of Preoperative Endometrial Biopsies With Postoperative Final Pathology in Endometrial Cancer

June 1, 2021 updated by: Erhan Okuyan,M.D, Batman Training and Research Hospital

The Compatibility of Preoperative Endometrial Biopsies With Postoperative Final Pathology in Endometrial Cancer; Should Preoperative Pathology Samples of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Center be Re-evaluated?

Although there are many studies comparing preoperative and postoperative histological diagnoses in the literature, there are no studies evaluating the compatibility of preoperative histological diagnoses obtained from different centers with postoperative histological diagnoses.Therefore, in our study, we aimed to determine whether preoperative pathological specimens need to be re-evaluated in the referenced hospitals by comparing the compatibility of endometrial specimens in secondary care and tertiary centers with their final pathologies.In our study, we aimed to reveal the under and overdiagnosis rates of the preoperative histological diagnoses of our hospitals compared to the final pathology.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medical data of 960 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 41 were excluded from the study due to non-surgical treatment, 254 patients having biopsy only in one center preoperatively, and lack of medical data in 52 patients.The study included 613 patients who had preoperative endometrial biopsy specimens evaluated by two different centers, diagnosed with endometrial cancer and treated surgically. Our study was conducted in the gynecological oncology department of our university after obtaining the approval of the ethics committee numbered 430-2019.The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were evaluated by examining the hospital records of age, gravida, parity, BM (body mass index), menopausal status and systemic diseases. Histopathological and clinical features of endometrial cancer were reviewed.In this study, endometrial biopsy samples taken in the second stage state hospital were re-evaluated by the gynecopathologist working at the university hospital and / or the evaluation process was carried out in two steps by examining the repeated endometrial biopsy sampling.Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer were treated surgically in our clinic. Endometrial sampling results based on uterine cancer risk groups; While histologically endometrioid and nonendometrioid were evaluated in two groups, the greade1-2 (low risk), greade3 (high risk) of uterine cancer were evaluated in four groups as those without malingnancy (benign and premaling lesions).By comparing these preoperative histological diagnoses with postoperative surgical final pathology, the accuracy rates for histological type and greade were determined. In addition, lower diagnosis, comorbidity and higher diagnosis rates compared to final pathology were examined for two different centers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

960

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who received treatment in a tertiary care center for cancer of endometry

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged 40-90 years diagnosed with endometrial cancer according to

endometrial sampling results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of medical data
  • Endometrial sampling in only one center

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
preoperative endometrial sampling result (secondary hospital)/1
Endometrial biopsy samples taken at the stage 2 state hospital
The endometrial biopsy samples taken at the second stage state hospital were re-evaluated by the gynecopathologist working at the university hospital and / or the repeated endometrial biopsy sampling was examined and the evaluation process was carried out in two steps.
preoperative endometrial sampling result (tertiary hospital)/2
Endometrial biopsy samples taken at the stage (tertiary hospital)
The endometrial biopsy samples taken at the second stage state hospital were re-evaluated by the gynecopathologist working at the university hospital and / or the repeated endometrial biopsy sampling was examined and the evaluation process was carried out in two steps.
final postoperative pathology/3
final postoperative pathology results with grade (endometrium cancer)
The endometrial biopsy samples taken at the second stage state hospital were re-evaluated by the gynecopathologist working at the university hospital and / or the repeated endometrial biopsy sampling was examined and the evaluation process was carried out in two steps.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of endometrial sampling results performed in 2 different centers
Time Frame: 1 year
in our study, we aimed to determine whether preoperative pathological specimens need to be re-evaluated in the referenced hospitals by comparing the compatibility of endometrial specimens in secondary care and tertiary centers with their final pathologies.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To reveal the rates of under and overdiagnosis of preoperative histological results
Time Frame: 1 year
Correlation of preoperative pathological diagnoses with postoperative final pathological diagnoses.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yusuf Cakmak, M.D, Batman education and research hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on re-evaluation of endometrial biopsy samples by a gynecopathologist working at a university hospital

3
Subscribe