Validation of an ERAS Protocol in Gynecological Surgery (ERASGYNBS001)

February 6, 2020 updated by: Federico Ferrari, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

Validation of an ERAS Protocol in Gynecological Surgery: an Italian Randomized Controlled Trial

Validation of ERAS interventional measures in elective gynecological surgery, for benign either malignant pathology.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Brescia, BS, Italy, 25123
        • Federico Ferrari

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 and <75 years old
  • Patients candidated for elective gynecological surgery for benign pathology
  • Patients with diagnosis of gynecological neoplasm and candidated for elective gynecological surgery
  • Signed consent form
  • Karnofsky Performance Status > 70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA score > 3
  • Contraindication to loco-regional anaesthesia
  • Patients with ileus or subocclusive condition prior surgery
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Organ failure or severe disfunction (heart, renal, pulmonary, hepatic)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (>180/95)
  • Alcohol or drug abuser (current or previous)
  • Unability to self-care (PFS < 70)
  • Comorbidity-Polypharmacy Score > 22
  • Psychiatric condition or language barriers
  • Planned Intensive Care Recovery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard Perioperative (SP) care
Experimental: ERAS protocol
Optimization of relevant medical uncontrolled situations, avoid fasting, avoid bowel preparation, avoid premedications, nutritional assessment, stop smoking, stop alcohol and appropriate counselling
Blended anesthesia is mostly carried out using Total Intra Venous Anesthesia (TIVA) with loco regional analgesia, in particular Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia (TEA) in open surgery and spinal morphine or Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block or quadratus lumborum block for laparoscopic surgical approach, associated to NSAIDs or acetaminophen; control of deep neuromuscular blocking with Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation avoiding residual paralysis. Multimodal prevention of PONV (according to preoperative assessment of Apfel Score) with a combination of multiple antiemetic drugs.
Postoperative pain control is obtained with opioid sparing strategies, in order to avoid Post Operative Ileus (POI) and PONV. According to the type of surgery TEA, TAP block , quadratus lumborum block or IT morphine is preferred. Patient is proposed to start drinking clear fluid 4 hours after surgery and to start eating the evening of the surgery, with the introduction of a normal free diet within 24 hours after surgery. It is proposed to chew gum three times daily for at least 15 minutes and eventually to use laxatives to promote a faster bowel function. Early mobilization is started from the evening of surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shorter Length Of Hospitalization (LOH)
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Total amount of days spent in hospital
Up to 4 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of postoperative pain
Time Frame: At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
NRS scale (from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain, 10 is maximum pain)
At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
Presence/Absence of nausea
Time Frame: At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
Presence/Absence of vomiting
Time Frame: At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
At moment 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery
Anesthesiological complications
Time Frame: Up to 1 weeks after surgery
Rate measurement
Up to 1 weeks after surgery
Time to bowel movement
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Time to flatus
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Time to hunger
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Time to drink
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Time to eating
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Time to walking
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Hours elapsed to event
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 9 weeks after surgery
Rate measurement
Up to 9 weeks after surgery
Compliance to ERAS protocol
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Rate measurement
Up to 4 weeks after surgery
Validated questionnaires
Time Frame: Administered 24 hours after surgery and up to 4 weeks after surgery
QoR15
Administered 24 hours after surgery and up to 4 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NP 2722

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Changes in preoperative care

3
Subscribe