- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04978857
Feasibility Study of Virtual Reality to Promote the Awakening of Patients in a State of Minimal Consciousness (REVEIL)
Advances in neurosurgery and neuroresuscitation have improved patients' prognosis. However, 2% of serious head injuries progress to a vegetative state, this condition persisting at 1 year for 1% of these patients.
The minimum state of consciousness is to be distinguished from coma and vegetative state, it is a condition marked by a severe alteration of consciousness in which there are minimal and fluctuating, but obvious, signs of environmental consciousness. There is a minimum degree of response to some stimulations, response generally fluctuating over time. In practice, these patients are unable to consistently follow simple instructions, but they often have a preserved visual pursuit (proper rotation of the head when someone enters the room, prolonged eye follow-up, etc.). Patients with minimal awareness have been shown to perceive emotions and pain. These patients may exhibit behavioural and emotional changes (smiling, crying motivated), induced by verbal stimulations (familiar voice). But these events remain fluctuating during the day or according to the days and interlocutors.
For the moment, the most commonly accepted strategy since the 1990s remains sensory stimulation (SS), while knowing that this term includes extremely varied stimulations (sensory, olfactory, auditory, fixation on a mirror, etc.) without the practice of this technique being well defined and systematized.
It has been shown that a regular family visit program with auditory, emotional and tactile stimuli improves the state of consciousness of these patients. Physicians also know that this SS must be personalized and adapted to the patient's tolerance and premorbid preferences.
SS programmes are poorly standardized. Programmes generally consist of a simple, moderate to high intensity, non-standardized stimulation, presented repetitively and frequently. Indeed, it has been shown that stimulation must begin early, be frequent, and continue until reactions appear.
In this project, investigator want to use the new technologies now commonly used such as photos, videos or sounds taken by smartphone's relatives of the brain patient-injured in order to make a personalized 3D film using film editing software and a predefined film frame, by integrating autobiographical elements and emotional, multisensory (binaural sound, vibration) integrating, if possible, a certain interactivity (haptic feedback, triggering of videos by the patient's eyes).
The objective is to develop an innovative multi-sensory stimulation technique through a personalised enriched environment to induce, facilitate and accelerate the return to consciousness of patients in altered state of consciousness during their initial management.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: DRCI Promotion Interne
- Phone Number: +33 0241353637
- Email: DRCI-Promotion-Interne@chu-angers.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jean-Michel LEMEE
- Phone Number: +33 0241353637
- Email: jmlemee@chu-angers.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Angers, France
- Recruiting
- CHU Angers
-
Contact:
- Jean-Michel LEMEE
- Phone Number: +33 0241353637
- Email: jmlemee@chu-angers.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient diagnosed with minimal consciousness
- Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
- Signature of consent by a relative of the patient
- Tolerance of the multisensory stimulation material during the pre-inclusion phase
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minor
- Pregnant woman
- Patient with contraindication to study procedures (Contraindication to wearing a virtual reality headset (unbalanced epilepsy, craniofacial trauma, major visual disturbances; contraindication to the fMRI)
- Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Person receiving psychiatric care under duress
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Virtual reality headset
|
viewing an autobiographic film through a virtual reality headset
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
percentage of patients without any adverse event or sign of bad tolerance
Time Frame: 1 month
|
to assess the feasibility of multisensory virtual reality stimulation proposed in this study in patients with minimal post-traumatic consciousness
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time required for film design
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
to assess the feasibility of making a personalized film
|
2 weeks
|
|
type and quantity of autobiographical material to be obtained from the patient's relatives
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
to assess the feasibility of making a personalized film
|
2 weeks
|
|
Patient clinical responses (blood pressure, body motion, eye-tracking)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess signs of patient's interaction with the virtual reality headset during the pre-inclusion phase and during the test phase, and the evolution over time of these signs during the test phase
|
1 month
|
|
Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM)
Time Frame: 6 month
|
To assess the evolution of the patient's clinical status Scale from 0 which means vegetative state to 62 which means pauci-relational state
|
6 month
|
|
Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R)
Time Frame: 6 month
|
To assess the evolution of the patient's clinical status
|
6 month
|
|
functional MRI
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess and compare the different brain networks identified during the fMRI performed one week after the initial fMRI test phase performed the week preceding the test phase.
|
1 month
|
|
patient's relative satisfaction scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess patient's family's feelings and experiences with this intervention (interviews etc). Scale from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum); 1 means not satisfied at all and 7 means very satisfied |
1 month
|
|
healthcare team satisfaction scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess healthcare team feelings and experiences with this intervention (adherence to this rehabilitation technique etc) Scale from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum); 1 means not satisfied at all and 7 means very satisfied
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 49RC20_0238
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.