Patient-oriented Randomized Pragmatic Feasibility Trial with RTMS in Depression and Anxiety (PORT)

December 18, 2024 updated by: Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, MD, PhD, FRCPC, DFAPA, University of British Columbia
This trial compares intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) to low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFR) in regards to depression and anxiety outcomes in 100 patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this trial is to evaluate whether a definite adaptive pragmatic trial would be feasible and establish clear go/no-go criteria as to whether proceeding to such definite trial is feasible. Specific aims include 1) testing the feasibility of recruiting a sample of TRD patients with less strict inclusion and exclusion criteria; 2) comparing different depression and anxiety scales (both clinician-rated and self-rated) and seek input from patients regarding their preferences; 3) seek input from patients with regards to the use of digital phenotyping as a tool to investigate biomarkers as well as engaging in the design of a potential implementation of such biomarker in a future definite trial.

Aim 1. To evaluate the feasibility of a future definite adaptive pragmatic RCT comparing left vs right DLPFC repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in TRD.

Hypothesis 1a: Enrollment will be 70% of the planned target over the 1-year recruitment period.

Hypothesis 1b: Retention rate of randomized participants will be ≥70% at the end of the intervention in both groups.

Aim 2. To evaluate patients' preferences regarding information about treatment options when there is no response to allocated treatment.

Hypothesis 2: Patients will prefer to modify treatment when there is no response.

Aim 3. To assess the feasibility of digital phenotyping as an tool to investigate biomarkers in TRD.

Hypothesis 3a: Survey uptake and participation in the study regarding the use of digital phenotyping will be 80% of randomized participants. Hypothesis 3b: Of those survey responders, 75% will indicate they would consent to digital phenotyping in a future definite RCT.

Aim 4. To develop a Bayesian statistical model that continuously updates personalized treatment effect estimates as the trial progresses, and identify the circumstances under which use of the model in a full-scale trial could inform treatment choice as the trial progresses.

Hypothesis 4: The modeling results will identify at least one subgroup for whom early stopping of the definitive trial in that subgroup may be warranted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 2A1
        • Recruiting
        • Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Therapies (NINET) Laboratory, UBC Department of Psychiatry
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, M.D., Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. are outpatients;
  2. are voluntary and competent to consent to treatment;
  3. are ≥ 18 years;
  4. have a score ≥ 26 on the IDS-30-SR;
  5. have had no increase or initiation of any psychotropic medication in the 4 weeks prior to screening;
  6. able to adhere to the treatment schedule;
  7. pass the TMS adult safety screening (TASS) questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. have active suicidal intent;
  2. are pregnant;
  3. have a lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder type I, schizophreniform, schizoaffective disorder or presence of psychotic symptoms within last 3 months;
  4. have a concomitant major unstable medical illness;
  5. have any significant form of dementia or any history of epilepsy;
  6. have any intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed;
  7. If participating in psychotherapy, must have been in stable treatment for at least 3 months prior to entry into the study, with no anticipation of change in the frequency of therapeutic sessions, or the therapeutic focus over the duration of the study;
  8. If they are taking psychotropic medication, be on a stable dose for 4 weeks before starting treatment, and no initiation of new regular psychotropic medication;
  9. have a clinically significant laboratory abnormality, in the opinion of the one of the principal investigators;
  10. have a non-correctable clinically significant sensory impairment (i.e., cannot hear well enough to cooperate with interview).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS)
iTBS to the L-DLPFC
rTMS will employ the MagPro X100 stimulator equipped with the cool-B70 coil (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark). The dose will be a 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) in accordance to our latest trial using iTBS. Localization of the right and left DLPFC will follow the well-established Beam F3 procedure. Subjects will then undergo 30 sessions of rTMS, once daily on weekdays for 6 weeks. FDA-approved iTBS protocol will consist of bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz, bursts repeated at 5 Hz for 600 pulses total, 2 s on, 8 s off, for 3 min 9 sec, at 120% rMT. LFR will consist of 1 Hz stimulation consisting of a single train of 10min duration for 600 pulses total at 120% rMT.
Active Comparator: Low Frequency Right (LFR)
1Hz stimulation to the R-DLPFC
rTMS will employ the MagPro X100 stimulator equipped with the cool-B70 coil (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark). The dose will be a 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) in accordance to our latest trial using iTBS. Localization of the right and left DLPFC will follow the well-established Beam F3 procedure. Subjects will then undergo 30 sessions of rTMS, once daily on weekdays for 6 weeks. FDA-approved iTBS protocol will consist of bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz, bursts repeated at 5 Hz for 600 pulses total, 2 s on, 8 s off, for 3 min 9 sec, at 120% rMT. LFR will consist of 1 Hz stimulation consisting of a single train of 10min duration for 600 pulses total at 120% rMT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression severity
Time Frame: one week post treatment
Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS-30-SR); Minimum value per question: 0; Maximum value per question: 3; Total minimum value: 0; Total maximum value: 84; Higher score means worse outcome.
one week post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal ideation
Time Frame: one week post treatment
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS); This questionnaire has binary responses (Yes/No). More responses with "Yes" mean worse outcome.
one week post treatment
Anxiety severity
Time Frame: one week post treatment
Brief Symptom Inventory anxiety subscale (BSI-Anxiety); Minimum value per question: 0 (Not at all); Maximum value per question: 4 (Extremely); Total minimum value: 0; Total maximum value: 24; Higher score means worse outcome.
one week post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, MD, PhD, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Subscribe