Cost-utility of VIRTUAL FIBROWALK

Cost-utility of the Multicomponent Program VIRTUAL FIBROWALK in Patients With Fibromyalgia

The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-utility of the VIRTUAL FIBROWALK multicomponent treatment program as coadjuvant of treatment-as- usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a two-arm RCT focused on the effectiveness and cost-utility of the multicomponent program VIRTUAL FIBROWALK as coadjuvant of treatment-as- usual (TAU) vs. TAU alone (in a 3-month follow-up RCT) VIRTUAL FIBROWALK combines multicomponent approach based on Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), therapeutic exercise, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Mayte Serrat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults from 18 to 75 years-old.
  • 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria + the 2011 modified ACR diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia
  • Able to understand Spanish and accept to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in concurrent or past RCTs (previous year).
  • Comorbidity with severe mental disorders (i.e. psychosis) or neurodegenerative diseases (i.e. Alzheimer) that that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the RCT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) consisted of the prescribed drugs adapted to the symptomatic profile of each patient and basic face to face and written advice on PNE and aerobic exercise adapted to the physical capacities of the patients at the beginning of the study.patient
To assess the effectiveness and cost-utility of the virtual multicomponent program (Fibrowalk)
Experimental: Multicomponent treatment VIRTUAL FIBROWALK + TAU
VIRTUAL FIBROWALK is a multicomponent non-pharmacological program based on Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), therapeutic exercise, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness Training
To assess the effectiveness and cost-utility of the virtual multicomponent program (Fibrowalk)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
The FIQR comprises three dimensions: physical dysfunction (scores from 0 to 30), overall impact (scores from 0 to 20), and intensity of the symptoms (scores from 0 to 50) is used to measure the impact generated by FM during the last week. It consists of 21 items, which are answered on a numerical rating scale of 11 points (from 0 to 10). Total scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater deterioration.
Change from baseline values at 6 months
Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
The Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) is a tool used to collect information on the whole range of services and supports study participants may use. This data can be used for a wide range of applications, including estimating the costs of service receipt.
Change from baseline values at 6 months
EuroQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
Change from baseline values at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
HADS is used to quantify the severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. It consists of two dimensions (anxiety and depression) of 7 items each responding on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale (HADS-A and HADSD) range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Change from baseline values at 6 months
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
TSK-11 is used to assess fear of pain and movement. It consists of 11 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale range from 11 to 44, where higher scores indicate a greater fear of pain and movement.
Change from baseline values at 6 months
Physical Function of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 6 months
Physical Function of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was used to measure physical function.This dimension comprises a total of 10 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 3 points. Total scores on each scale are then transformed and can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better physical function.
Change from baseline values at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 10, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyoma;Cervix

Clinical Trials on Multicomponent treatment VIRTUAL FIBROWALK + TAU

Subscribe