Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Immunoadsorption and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS-PRAISING)

March 10, 2025 updated by: Wang Miao, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Parallel Controlled Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Protein a Immunoadsorption and Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Guillain-Barre syndrome is an immune-mediated acute inflammatory peripheral neuropathy. The currently effective treatment methods include intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange. Immunoadsorption has been widely used to treat immune-related diseases. There are currently no prospective large-sample clinical trials of immunoadsorption therapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome. The neuro-intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University is preparing to carry out a prospective, multi-center, randomized parallel controlled clinical study on the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. It is estimated that 204 patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome will be included. The patients will be randomly assigned to the immunoadsorption group and the IVIG group. The primary outcome measure: changes in Hughes scores (4 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment) ). This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated acute inflammatory peripheral neuropathy. The currently proven effective treatment methods include intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange. In the clinical treatment process, the plasma source is often stressed, forcing the treatment to be terminated. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy may cause allergies. Based on the above reasons, immunosorbent technology came into being.

Immunoadsorption technology is widely used in clinical treatment of immune-related diseases. Protein A can recognize and bind to the Fc segment of human antibodies. The protein A immunosorbent column uses recombinant staphylococcal protein A as its ligand. The protein can specifically recognize and bind to the Fc segment of human antibodies, so it can adsorb human antibodies, mainly immunoglobulin G, and can adsorb immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin A at the same time. The binding of protein A and antibody is reversible.

Immunoadsorption therapy has obvious advantages: The patient's own plasma is transfused without replacement fluid; It can prevent infection Diseases such as viral hepatitis, AIDS, etc.; The adsorption is selective or specific, and normal plasma components including coagulation factors, etc., only slightly decrease; Does not affect the simultaneous drug treatment; The protein A immunosorbent column can be reused; The treatment effect is better, and the amount of plasma purified by a single immunoadsorption is 1.5 to 3 times that of plasma exchange.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University is preparing to carry out a prospective, multi-center, randomized parallel controlled clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. The control group received intravenous immunoglobulin injections using the standard treatment recommended by the Guilan-Barre Syndrome Guidelines. Compare the effectiveness and safety of the two treatment regimens in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome, and explore a more effective and safe treatment regimen for the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

204

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
          • Wang Miao, Prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meet the diagnostic criteria of Guillain - Barre syndrome;
  2. The onset is within 2 weeks;
  3. Age is greater than or equal to 18 years old and less than or equal to 60 years old;
  4. Hughes function classification is greater than or equal to 3;
  5. The subject or his legal representative can understand the purpose of the research, show sufficient compliance with the research protocol, and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those who are pregnant;
  2. Three months before the screening period, receive immunoadsorption therapy or intravenous immunoglobulin therapy;
  3. Those who have a history of allergies in the membrane of the plasma separator;
  4. Those who must use angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor drugs within 1 week before being included in the trial and during treatment and cannot be stopped;
  5. Severe active bleeding or diffuse intravascular coagulation, patients with systemic circulatory failure that are difficult to correct with drugs;
  6. Severe cardiac insufficiency, that is, those who have reached NYHA IV according to the heart failure classification standards of the New York Heart Association (NYHA);
  7. There are contraindications to intravenous immunoglobulin;
  8. Those with other system autoimmune diseases;
  9. Diagnosis of variant GBS: such as Miller-Fisher syndrome, GBS with cranial nerve damage, sensory GBS, pan-autonomous GBS. Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyperipheral neuropathy whose condition has been significantly alleviated when visiting a doctor;
  10. Subjects who have participated in any other drug or medical device clinical trials within 1 month before entering the screening period; Note: Subjects who participated in observational studies (that is, the study does not require changes or other interventions) will not be excluded;
  11. Patients who cannot obtain informed consent;
  12. Those who cannot receive active and comprehensive treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immunoadsorption group
Protein A immunoadsorption therapy
Immunoadsorption treatment regimen: the treatment is performed once every 1-3 days, at least 5 times, and the amount of regenerated plasma for each treatment is 1 to 3 times the plasma volume. The immunosorbent column adopts the protein A immunosorbent column.
Other Names:
  • Protein A Immunoadsorption
Active Comparator: intravenous immunoglobulin group
Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment regimen: intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, 400mg/kg/d, once a day, for at least 5 consecutive days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Hughes scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Compared with the patient's Hughes score before treatment, the change of Hughes scores 4 weeks after the start of protein A immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin treatment.
4 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Hughes scores
Time Frame: 2 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Compared with the patient's Hughes score before treatment, the change of Hughes scores 2 weeks after the start of protein A immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin treatment.
2 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Reached Hughes Grade 2
Time Frame: From date of first treatment until the date of patient's recovery to Hughes Grade 2 or end date of clinical trial, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
The time from the start of treatment to the patient's recovery to Hughes Grade 2. The time from the start of protein A immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin treatment to the time the patient recovers to be able to walk independently for a distance of more than 5 meters.
From date of first treatment until the date of patient's recovery to Hughes Grade 2 or end date of clinical trial, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
Ventilator application time
Time Frame: For patients who require ventilator-assisted ventilation, from date of start use ventilator until participants leave the ventilator or end date of clinical trial, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
For patients with ventilator-assisted ventilation, the length of time from the beginning of treatment to leaving the ventilator.
For patients who require ventilator-assisted ventilation, from date of start use ventilator until participants leave the ventilator or end date of clinical trial, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
Total time in ICU
Time Frame: From the date the patient enters the ICU until the patient leaves the ICU or the clinical trial ends, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
The total time that patients in the protein A immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin group were admitted to the ICU.
From the date the patient enters the ICU until the patient leaves the ICU or the clinical trial ends, whichever came first, assessed up to 4 weeks.
Changes of total lymphocyte count, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, cerebrospinal fluid protein
Time Frame: 2 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Compared with the results before treatment, changes of total lymphocyte count, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, cerebrospinal fluid protein after 2 weeks of the start of the treatment.
2 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Changes of Compound muscle action potential and motor nerve conduction velocity of bilateral tibial nerves
Time Frame: 4 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)
Changes of Compound muscle action potential and motor nerve conduction velocity of bilateral tibial nerves before the treatment and 4 weeks after the start of the treatment in the protein A immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin group.
4 weeks after starting treatment vs. baseline (before starting treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Junfang Teng, Prof, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Principal Investigator: Wang Miao, Prof, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the clinical trial is completed, the individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available after five years, permanent.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

No.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Clinical Trials on immunosorbent column

Subscribe