Antibiotic Impregnated Bone Graft to Reduce Infection in Hip Replacement. (ABOGRAFT)

November 28, 2023 updated by: Jörg Schilcher, University Hospital, Linkoeping

Antibiotic Impregnated Bone Graft to Reduce Infection in Hip Replacement. The ABOGRAFT Trial

Total hip replacement is the most successful treatment modern healthcare can offer patients to regain quality of life. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common and devastating complication after total hip replacement (THR). Between 0.5 to 2% of primary THR (first time hip replacement), and 8-10% of revision THR (replacement of a hip prosthesis) will become infected.1 The introduction of local antibiotics blended into bone cement has led to a reduction in postoperative infection in primary THR by half.2 Unfortunately, cement can't always be used in relevant quantities.

The number of primary and revision surgeries of the hip is projected to increase dramatically. Therefore, the need for a feasible infection prophylaxis that is applicable for complex primary and revision THR in addition to antibiotics loaded cement is urgent.

Impacted morselized bone allograft is often used in (revision) THR to fill bone defects. Morselized allograft has been used as a carrier for local antibiotic treatment in multiple pilot studies and appears to be an attractive and effective treatment option, both for already infected joints and as a prophylactic measure in high-risk patients (e.g. THR revision surgeries). Nonetheless, a pivotal trial to support its use in THR is lacking. The aim of this pragmatic randomized controlled double blinded drug trial is to investigate whether antibiotic impregnated bone graft (AIBG) decreases the risk of infection after hip arthroplasty compared to controls treated with placebo impregnated bone graft. Patients scheduled for elective THR will be randomized to receive AIBG or a placebo impregnated bone graft. The primary outcome variable will be the number of re-operations due to infections and PJI diagnoses 2 years postoperative.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

850

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Region Östergotland
      • Linköping, Region Östergotland, Sweden, 58185
        • Recruiting
        • Universitetssjukhuset Linköping
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Hip arthroplasty requiring bone graft
  3. Willing to provide informed consent.
  4. For women of childbearing potential; a negative pregnancy test prior to reoperation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing prosthetic joint infection
  2. Known allergies and contraindications for the use of vancomycin or tobramycin
  3. Mental inability, reluctance, or language difficulties that according to investigator judgement, result in difficulty understanding the meaning of study participation
  4. Expected difficulties to complete 2-year follow-up
  5. Women of child bearing potential not using contraception
  6. Pregnant women
  7. Nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment arm
Combination of vancomycin and tobramycin mixed with allograft and locally administered during revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty.
1 g vancomycin (powder) diluted in 8 ml tobramycin (80mg/ml). Added to the prepared allograft before the allograft is used during the revision surgery.
Other Names:
  • Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Saline locally added to allograft and locally administered during revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty.
As a placebo added to the allograft.
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reoperation due to infection or diagnosed PJI with bacteria that are sensitive to either vancomycin or tobramycin, in the same hip joint, within two years after hip arthroplasty.
Time Frame: 2 years after finalizing data collection.
Reoperation due to infection or diagnosed PJI 2 years of revision surgery.
2 years after finalizing data collection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time and cause for reoperation for any reason within 2 and 5 years
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Time and cause for reoperation for any reason within 2 and 5 years
2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Time and cause for implant revision due to any reason within 2 and 5 years
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Time and cause for implant revision due to any reason within 2 and 5 years
2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Type of microbe and antibiotic resistance pattern for cases complicated with postoperative infection
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Type of microbe and antibiotic resistance pattern for cases complicated with postoperative infection
2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the frequencies of adverse events
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the frequencies of adverse events
2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the rates of revision due to aseptic loosening
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.
Differences between the two experimental groups regarding the rates of revision due to aseptic loosening
2 and 5 years after finalizing data collection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jörg Schilcher, PhD, Linkoeping University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prosthetic Joint Infection

Clinical Trials on Saline

3
Subscribe