Predictive Factors on the Results of Epidural Adhesiolysis in Patient With Chronic Spinal Pain

August 13, 2023 updated by: Selin Guven Kose, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Predictive Factors on the Results of Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis in Patient With Chronic Spinal Pain

The primary aim of this exploratory study was to determine the demographic, clinical, and technical factors associated with treatment outcome, to create a better select treatment candidates.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06110
        • Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting with low back or leg pain who have not had positive responsive to the conservative treatments or procedures, such as epidural steroid injections.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients in whom percutaneous epidural lysis of adhesions was performed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • nonadhesiolytic procedure
  • lack of follow-up
  • incomplete outcome data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post-procedure
The visual analog scale is a numerical scale from 0 to 10; with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable.
baseline to 12 months post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 127/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous adhesiolysis

3
Subscribe