Role of Steroids and 10% Hypertonic Sodium Chloride in Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome Patients

April 24, 2017 updated by: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Pain Management Center of Paducah

Evaluation of the Role of Steroids and 10% Hypertonic Sodium Chloride in Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Equivalence, Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Lumbar Adhesiolysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of steroids and/or 10% hypertonic sodium chloride in percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain in patients with post lumbar surgery syndrome.

To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Recruitment is indicated in patients with chronic low back pain and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, non-responsive to conservative therapy with physical therapy, chiropractic, medical therapy, and fluoroscopically directed epidural injections.

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, equivalence, controlled trial performed in an interventional pain management referral center in the United States.

The study involves 240 patients studied in 4 groups with 60 patients in each group. Randomization includes sequence generation, allocation concealment, implementation, and blinding.

Data management analysis includes sample size justification of 40 patients in each group with a power of 80% and a 0.05% 2-sided significance level. Statistical methodology includes chi-squared statistics, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and paired t-test with significance evaluated at P value < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
        • Pain Management Center of Paducah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • History of lumbar surgery of at least 6 months duration in the past
  • Patients over the age of 18 years
  • Patients with a history of chronic function-limiting low back pain with or without lower extremity pain of at least 6 months duration (post-surgery)
  • Patients who are competent to understand the study protocol and provide voluntary, written informed consent and participate in outcome measurements.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Facet joints, uncontrollable as sole pain generators
  • Unstable or heavy opioid use (400 mg of morphine equivalents daily)
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
  • Uncontrolled medical illness
  • Any conditions that could interfere with the interpretation of the outcome assessments
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients with a history or potential for adverse reaction(s) to local anesthetic, steroids, or hypertonic sodium chloride solution.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Celestone
Group I will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and non-particulate Celestone
Group I will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and non-particulate Celestone
Other Names:
  • Adhesiolysis in post-surgery
Active Comparator: sodium chloride solution
Group II will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and 0.9% sodium chloride solution to substitute for non-particulate Celestone
Group I will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and non-particulate Celestone
Other Names:
  • Adhesiolysis in post-surgery
Active Comparator: sodium choride solution
Group III will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, normal sodium chloride solution instead of 10% hypertonic sodium chloride solution and non-particulate Celestone;
Group I will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and non-particulate Celestone
Other Names:
  • Adhesiolysis in post-surgery
Active Comparator: Double substitutes
Group IV will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, and 0.9% sodium chloride solution to substitute for the 10% hypertonic sodium chloride, and 0.9% sodium chloride solution to substitute for non-particulate Celestone
Group I will receive adhesiolysis, local anesthetic, 10% sodium chloride solution, and non-particulate Celestone
Other Names:
  • Adhesiolysis in post-surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI),
Time Frame: Outcomes are measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.
duration of significant pain relief, opioid intake, and return to work
Outcomes are measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse event profile of side effects and complications.
Time Frame: Adverse events are measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment, and at any time during the procedure or after the procedure the adverse events are suspected or expected.
Record side effects and any complications
Adverse events are measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment, and at any time during the procedure or after the procedure the adverse events are suspected or expected.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, PMC of Paducah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Adhesiolysis

3
Subscribe