The Effect of Reablement Service of Long-term Care on Physical Mobility and Quality of Life in Disable People

March 15, 2022 updated by: Jia-Ching Chen, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

To Investigate the Effect of Rreablement Service of Long-term Care on Physical Mobility and Quality of Life in Disable People

The long-term care 2.0 policy has been launched at 2017 by Taiwanese government to respond the rate of aging population reached to14% and estimated to 20% in 2025, becoming a "super-aged society" in Taiwan. As aging society, the ratio of chronic disease and disability has reasonably raised. The home reablement and care of this policy are not only to prevent and delay disability but provide daily care for the elderly who needed. As the implementation of the policy, there is still insufficient research to investigate and compare the effects on physical mobility and quality of life among the individual after using these different types of the service. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare the effects on physical function and quality of life of the frail and disabled individual with and without receiving the home reablement services.

The participants will be enrolled from the long-term care service units registered in local government at Hualien county, Taiwan. The recruited participants will be assigned to two groups in a convenient method (receiving and non-receiving the home reablement service). All participants will be assessed by a professional physical therapist at three time points, before the reablement, at 1-3 months after receiving the reablement, then follow-up after 3 months

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

93

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Aged from 50-90 years old
  • The disability grade level 2 to 8 according to the grading with long-term care case-mix system, approximately to 20 to 80 of Barthel Index score.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged from 50-90 years old
  • Be able to follow the command and cooperate with the assessor
  • The disability grade level 2 to 8 according to the grading with long-term care case-mix system, approximately to 20 to 80 of Barthel Index score.
  • Receiving the reablement services at least 3 times/a set.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Using the outpatient rehabilitation service during the study period
  • Transferring or delivering to institution
  • Re-admission to hospital during using the service

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Reablement group
The home reablement program will be implemented by a physical therapist according to "Long-term Care Reablement Operational Guidelines" announced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwanese government
The service provider customizes a training plan and formulates training goals based on the patient's level of disability, family environment, and the needs of the patient and the caregiver.
Non-reablement group
This group will only receive general home care service without the reablement program.
The service provider customizes a training plan and formulates training goals based on the patient's level of disability, family environment, and the needs of the patient and the caregiver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The SPPB is one of the most commonly used instruments for measuring physical performance in population studies of aging. The SPPB consists of three subtests: a hierarchical test of balance, a short walk at usual pace and standing up from a chair five times consecutively. Low scores on the SPPB have a high predictive value for a wide range of health consequences including disability in Activities of Daily Living.
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barthel index, BI
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The total score is from 0 to 100, each item is divided into 2-4 levels according to complete independence, need assistance and complete dependence. The lower the score, the higher the dependent level.
10 minutes
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL
Time Frame: 5 minutes
There are eight domains of function measured with the Lawton IADL scale. Evaluators are scored according to their highest level of functioning in that category. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men.
5 minutes
EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire, EQ-5D
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The quality of life was assessed using 5 items: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression. This questionnaire asks respondents to choose the option that best suits them based on their health status.
5 minutes
Elderly Mobility Scale, EMS
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The EMS is a 7-item objective measure designed to assess mobility and function in elderly adults. Divided into bedside mobility and functional mobility (lying to sitting, sitting to lying, standing, and balance and walking). The total score is 0 to 20 points. The higher the score, the better performance.
15 minutes
Handheld dynamometer to measure muscle strength
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Grip strength will be measured twice on the left and right sides of the elderly in a standard sitting position with elbow 90 degree and shoulder in neutral position, and the average value will be taken.
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jia-Ching Chen, Department of physical therapy, Tzu Chi University
  • Study Director: Lian-Cing Yan, Department of physical therapy, Tzu Chi University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB110-277-B

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reablement

Clinical Trials on Reablement

Subscribe