- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05299788
Post-thoracotomy Pain Management With Active External Warming and Ice Application
The Effectiveness of Active External Warming of Patient Concurrently With Ice Application on the Incision Site on Post-thoracotomy Pain and Analgesic Consumption
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study was initiated after obtaining the written approval of the study centers. The center of the study and the hospital where the research was conducted. Written permission was obtained from the hospital management. Within the scope of the research, the research was explained to the participants and their consent was obtained.
The routine analgesia protocol was applied to patients in the control group. In addition to the routine analgesia protocol, the study group was administered non-pharmacological pain control interventions comprising active external warming and ice application. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), all patients stayed in the same area without a separator so they could easily observe each other's interventions and hear the conversations occurring during medical intervention. For this reason, the control group was evaluated first. After the last patient in the control group was transferred to the clinic, the study group was evaluated.
Active External Warming: In the literature, the use of electric blankets and warm blowing devices were recommended as the best methods for postoperative active external warming.In this study, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for the control group. In addition to the cotton blankets and socks, electric blankets were used for the patients in the intervention group. In accordance with the literature, the temperature of the electric blanket was set at 38 °C (Celsius) at the beginning and increased to a maximum of 40-41 °C based on the patient's body temperature.
Application of ice to the incision site: Studies have reported that the cooling effect of ice packs is higher than that of cooled gel packs. In the intervention group, an ice pack was applied to the incision site for pain control in addition to active external warming. Ice packs at 0-5 °C with external dimensions of 160 × 91 × 34 mm and a filled weight of 363 g that were kept in the fridge were used for ice application. In this study, ice packs were applied in the first 12 postoperative hours for 20 minutes every 2 hours, and a parallel pain assessment was performed.
Measurements of body temperature, analgesic consumption, and pain level were made to evaluate the effectiveness of active external warming and ice application. The measurements and follow-up of the patients in the study and control groups in the ICU were carried out by these investigators.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Mediterrian
-
Antalya, Mediterrian, Turkey, 07058
- Akdeniz University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 65 years who were not underweight or obese (body mass index 19-30 kg/m2)
- Patients woke up within the first two postoperative hours, and had been extubated were included in the study group.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients in whom hemodynamic stabilization was not achieved 2 hours after thoracotomy,
- patients with Raynaud's phenomenon, neuropathy, or peripheric vascular disease,
- patients who underwent postoperative procedures that directly affect pain levels, such as decortication and thoracic wall resection,
- patients who received preemptive analgesia for pain control,
- patients who received analgesia through pleural, thoracal, and other catheter methods were excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: The routine analgesia group
The routine analgesia and warming protocol was applied to patients in the control group.The routine postoperative analgesic treatment protocol at the unit comprises the administration of 75 mg IM (Intramuscular) Diclofenac Sodium before the patient wakes up, 30 mg intravenous (IV) Tramadol if the patient complains of pain when awake (maximum dose of 100 mg/day), and 10 mg/day Morphine Sulfate.
In addition to, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for warming.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: The routine analgesia+active external warming+ice application group
In addition to the routine analgesia protocol, the study group was administered non-pharmacological pain control interventions.
|
In this study, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for the control group.
In addition to the cotton blankets and socks, electric blankets were used for the patients in the intervention group.
In accordance with the literature, the temperature of the electric blanket was set at 38 °C (Celsius) at the beginning and increased to a maximum of 40-41 °C based on the patient's body temperature .
In the intervention group, an ice pack was applied to the incision site for pain control in addition to active external warming.
Ice packs at 0-5 °C with external dimensions of 160 × 91 × 34 mm and a filled weight of 363 g that were kept in the fridge were used for ice application.
To prevent direct contact of the ice pack with the patient's skin, the ice pack was wrapped in a thin cotton sheath.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain score
Time Frame: Pain scoring was initiated when the patient was extubated and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form was used for pain assessment.
The Verbal Pain Scale, contained in the McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form, measured pain intensity at the four-hour mark rating pain of 0 - 5 with 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = discomforting pain, 3 distressing pain, 4 = horrible pain and 5 = excruciating pain.
|
Pain scoring was initiated when the patient was extubated and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
|
|
Analgesic consumption (mg)
Time Frame: Analgesic consumption was started to be recorded when the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
|
Algesic consumption: The analgesic consumption of the patient was evaluated with the analgesics used until the postoperative 48th hour.
The amount of analgesic administered to the patient was recorded in milligrams.
|
Analgesic consumption was started to be recorded when the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
|
|
Body temperature degree
Time Frame: The patient's body temperature was measured in the first four hours postoperatively
|
The patient's body temperature was recorded in degrees Celsius.
|
The patient's body temperature was measured in the first four hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Emine Kol, Dr, Researher
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 70904504/07
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute
-
Rajavithi HospitalCompletedTotal Abdominal Hysterectomy ,Pain , Acute Postoperative,Gabapentin , CelecoxibThailand
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruiting
-
Schulthess KlinikNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain, AcuteTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain, Acute
-
Federal State Budgetary Organization, Federal Center...Completed
-
Bursa Uludag UniversitesiCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingPost Operative Pain, AcuteEgypt
Clinical Trials on Active external warming
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityBilecik Seyh Edebali Universitesi; Kutahya City HospitalRecruitingBreastfeeding | Thermal Comfort | Cesarean ResectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Umeå UniversityMinistry of Health and Social Affairs, SwedenCompleted
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinCompleted
-
Ataturk UniversityNot yet recruitingInflammatory Response | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Perioperative Hypothermia | Surgical Stress ResponseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Haukeland University HospitalEnrolling by invitationAccidental HypothermiaNorway
-
Molnlycke Health Care ABCompletedInadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia | Anesthesia Induced Hypothermia
-
Dr. Asim AlamWithdrawnTrauma | Hypothermia | Temperature Change, BodyCanada
-
Aliona Vilinsky-RedmondCompletedNeonatal HypothermiaIreland
-
University of CalgaryActive, not recruitingStroke, AcuteCanada, New Zealand