Post-thoracotomy Pain Management With Active External Warming and Ice Application

March 18, 2022 updated by: Emine Kol, Akdeniz University

The Effectiveness of Active External Warming of Patient Concurrently With Ice Application on the Incision Site on Post-thoracotomy Pain and Analgesic Consumption

The aim of study is to investigate the effects of active external warming of patient concurrently with application of ice to incision site on thoracotomy pain and analgesic consumption. The research is a quasi-experimental design with control and study groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was initiated after obtaining the written approval of the study centers. The center of the study and the hospital where the research was conducted. Written permission was obtained from the hospital management. Within the scope of the research, the research was explained to the participants and their consent was obtained.

The routine analgesia protocol was applied to patients in the control group. In addition to the routine analgesia protocol, the study group was administered non-pharmacological pain control interventions comprising active external warming and ice application. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), all patients stayed in the same area without a separator so they could easily observe each other's interventions and hear the conversations occurring during medical intervention. For this reason, the control group was evaluated first. After the last patient in the control group was transferred to the clinic, the study group was evaluated.

Active External Warming: In the literature, the use of electric blankets and warm blowing devices were recommended as the best methods for postoperative active external warming.In this study, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for the control group. In addition to the cotton blankets and socks, electric blankets were used for the patients in the intervention group. In accordance with the literature, the temperature of the electric blanket was set at 38 °C (Celsius) at the beginning and increased to a maximum of 40-41 °C based on the patient's body temperature.

Application of ice to the incision site: Studies have reported that the cooling effect of ice packs is higher than that of cooled gel packs. In the intervention group, an ice pack was applied to the incision site for pain control in addition to active external warming. Ice packs at 0-5 °C with external dimensions of 160 × 91 × 34 mm and a filled weight of 363 g that were kept in the fridge were used for ice application. In this study, ice packs were applied in the first 12 postoperative hours for 20 minutes every 2 hours, and a parallel pain assessment was performed.

Measurements of body temperature, analgesic consumption, and pain level were made to evaluate the effectiveness of active external warming and ice application. The measurements and follow-up of the patients in the study and control groups in the ICU were carried out by these investigators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mediterrian
      • Antalya, Mediterrian, Turkey, 07058
        • Akdeniz University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years who were not underweight or obese (body mass index 19-30 kg/m2)
  • Patients woke up within the first two postoperative hours, and had been extubated were included in the study group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom hemodynamic stabilization was not achieved 2 hours after thoracotomy,
  • patients with Raynaud's phenomenon, neuropathy, or peripheric vascular disease,
  • patients who underwent postoperative procedures that directly affect pain levels, such as decortication and thoracic wall resection,
  • patients who received preemptive analgesia for pain control,
  • patients who received analgesia through pleural, thoracal, and other catheter methods were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: The routine analgesia group
The routine analgesia and warming protocol was applied to patients in the control group.The routine postoperative analgesic treatment protocol at the unit comprises the administration of 75 mg IM (Intramuscular) Diclofenac Sodium before the patient wakes up, 30 mg intravenous (IV) Tramadol if the patient complains of pain when awake (maximum dose of 100 mg/day), and 10 mg/day Morphine Sulfate. In addition to, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for warming.
EXPERIMENTAL: The routine analgesia+active external warming+ice application group
In addition to the routine analgesia protocol, the study group was administered non-pharmacological pain control interventions.
In this study, methods used routinely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) such as cotton blankets and socks were used for the control group. In addition to the cotton blankets and socks, electric blankets were used for the patients in the intervention group. In accordance with the literature, the temperature of the electric blanket was set at 38 °C (Celsius) at the beginning and increased to a maximum of 40-41 °C based on the patient's body temperature .
In the intervention group, an ice pack was applied to the incision site for pain control in addition to active external warming. Ice packs at 0-5 °C with external dimensions of 160 × 91 × 34 mm and a filled weight of 363 g that were kept in the fridge were used for ice application. To prevent direct contact of the ice pack with the patient's skin, the ice pack was wrapped in a thin cotton sheath.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: Pain scoring was initiated when the patient was extubated and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form was used for pain assessment. The Verbal Pain Scale, contained in the McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form, measured pain intensity at the four-hour mark rating pain of 0 - 5 with 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = discomforting pain, 3 distressing pain, 4 = horrible pain and 5 = excruciating pain.
Pain scoring was initiated when the patient was extubated and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
Analgesic consumption (mg)
Time Frame: Analgesic consumption was started to be recorded when the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
Algesic consumption: The analgesic consumption of the patient was evaluated with the analgesics used until the postoperative 48th hour. The amount of analgesic administered to the patient was recorded in milligrams.
Analgesic consumption was started to be recorded when the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, and until the postoperative 48th hour were recorded
Body temperature degree
Time Frame: The patient's body temperature was measured in the first four hours postoperatively
The patient's body temperature was recorded in degrees Celsius.
The patient's body temperature was measured in the first four hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Emine Kol, Dr, Researher

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Information will be shared by Akdeniz University Scientific Research Unit

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After complated to study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Information will be shared by Akdeniz University Scientific Research Unit

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Active external warming

Subscribe