Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Open Renal Surgeries in Children

May 19, 2022 updated by: Kareem Mohammed Assem Nawwar, Cairo University

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Open Renal Surgeries: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Open renal surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain; early control of the perioperative pain is associated with decrease of hemodynamic variations during the surgery, early mobilization, better quality of functional recovery & early discharge of patients. Side effects of systemic opioids, as well as difficulty to monitor their response, are major limitations to their use.

Pediatric regional anesthesia (PRA) is one of the most valuable and safe tools to treat perioperative pain, and is an essential part of modern anesthetic practice. Neuraxial analgesia for pediatric patients is a mode of pain control that gained popularity in the last few decades as it decreases opioid exposure, shortens recovery room time & hospital stay. Caudal block is the most commonly used neuraxial anesthesia in pediatric patients. However, its major side effect is urinary retention and excessive motor block.

Considerable progress has been made in the practice of PRA over the past few years including incorporation of ultrasound guidance, with promising novel regional anesthesia techniques, especially the anterolateral and the posterolateral trunk blocks.

In this study, the investigators will compare the ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) with erector spinae plane block (ESPB), regarding the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing unilateral open renal surgeries under general anesthesia. The study hypothesis is that QLB can provide a more superior postoperative pain relief to ESPB in children undergoing open renal surgeries.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II
  2. Children undergoing unilateral open renal surgeries

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Parents refusal for the block
  2. Bleeding disorders (platelets count < 100,000/uL; INR > 1.5; PC < 60%)
  3. Skin lesion, wounds or infection at the puncture site.
  4. Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group
30 child will receive a preoperative unilateral single shot US-guided erector spinae plane block at the level of T9 vertebra in the lateral position after induction of general anesthesia, using 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.125%
Using a 22-gauge 80 mm echogenic needle under ultrasound guidance, 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle after confirming correct needle location by a negative aspiration test then by injecting 0.5-1 ml saline and observing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process (hydrodissection). The ultrasound probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process on a parasagittal plane, to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process, directing the needle craniocaudally using the in-plane technique. The spread of the injectate will be observed to distribute within this plane.
Sonosite S-Nerve (USA) with a linear multi-frequency 6-13 MHz (hockey stick) transducer
A 22-gauge 80 mm needle the sonoplex needle manufactured by PAJUNK (USA)
Given intravenously (1 µg/kg) as part of induction of general anesthesia (GA) added to propofol 2 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg Intraoperatively, intravenous fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg (with a maximum dose of 2 µg/kg) will be administered in response to any increase in hemodynamics by more than 20% of baseline values in response to skin incision or there after throughout surgery (after exclusion of other causes of hemodynamic changes)
Will be given intravenously as a rescue analgesic (0.5 mg/kg with maximal dose 1.5 mg/kg) in both study groups if Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) more than 6. Quality of postoperative analgesia will be assessed using CHEOPS pain score at time transfer to PACU, 15, 30 minutes then 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postoperatively.
Active Comparator: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) group
30 child will receive a preoperative unilateral single shot US-guided quadratus lumborum block at the level of L2 spinous process in the lateral position after induction of general anesthesia, using 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.125%
Sonosite S-Nerve (USA) with a linear multi-frequency 6-13 MHz (hockey stick) transducer
A 22-gauge 80 mm needle the sonoplex needle manufactured by PAJUNK (USA)
Given intravenously (1 µg/kg) as part of induction of general anesthesia (GA) added to propofol 2 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg Intraoperatively, intravenous fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg (with a maximum dose of 2 µg/kg) will be administered in response to any increase in hemodynamics by more than 20% of baseline values in response to skin incision or there after throughout surgery (after exclusion of other causes of hemodynamic changes)
Will be given intravenously as a rescue analgesic (0.5 mg/kg with maximal dose 1.5 mg/kg) in both study groups if Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) more than 6. Quality of postoperative analgesia will be assessed using CHEOPS pain score at time transfer to PACU, 15, 30 minutes then 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postoperatively.
Using a 22-gauge 80 mm echogenic needle under ultrasound guidance, 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected in the fascial plane between the quadratus lumborum and psoas major muscle after confirming correct needle location by a negative aspiration test then by injecting 0.5-1 ml saline (hydrodissection). The ultrasound probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the L2 spinous process on an axial plane, to visualize the transverse process with psoas major muscle anterior, quadratus lumborum muscle lateral and erector spinae muscle posterior to it. The needle is inserted from the medial side of the probe and advanced laterally using the in-plane technique. The spread of the injectate will be observed to distribute within the target plane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first postoperative rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 12 hours
Time in minutes when postoperative Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) pain score exceeds 6 for the first time. Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale is a pain score with the least possible score is 4, while the highest possible score 13 (worse outcome).
12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total opioid analgesic consumption in the first 12 hours postoperative period
Time Frame: from time of patient transfer to the PACU, till 12 hours postoperatively
when postoperative Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) pain score ˃ 6 in the first 12 hours postoperatively. Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale is a pain score with the least possible score is 4, while the highest possible score 13 (worse outcome).
from time of patient transfer to the PACU, till 12 hours postoperatively
Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: During surgery (from induction of general anesthesia till 15 mins. after performance of the nerve block)
measured from induction of general anesthesia, after performance of the nerve block and at 1,5,10, 15 mins. after
During surgery (from induction of general anesthesia till 15 mins. after performance of the nerve block)
Intraoperative heart rate
Time Frame: During surgery (from induction of general anesthesia till 15 mins. after performance of the nerve block)
measured before and after induction of general anesthesia, after performance of the nerve block and at 1,5,10, 15 mins. after
During surgery (from induction of general anesthesia till 15 mins. after performance of the nerve block)
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: from time of patient transfer to the PACU, till 12 hours postoperatively
measured at time of patient transfer to the PACU, 15, 30 mins, 1 ,2 , 4 ,6 ,12 hours after surgery
from time of patient transfer to the PACU, till 12 hours postoperatively
Block performance time
Time Frame: Time from ultrasound visualization of target injection site to end of local anesthetic (bupivacaine) deposition up to 15 mins.
Time to perform ultrasound guided nerve block
Time from ultrasound visualization of target injection site to end of local anesthetic (bupivacaine) deposition up to 15 mins.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indirect signs of local anesthetic toxicity
Time Frame: from time of local anesthetic (bupivacaine) deposition till 6 hours postoperatively
intraoperative arrhythmias and delayed awakening
from time of local anesthetic (bupivacaine) deposition till 6 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nevine M Gouda, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Sherif M Soaida, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Ismail S Hammad, Cairo University
  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed T Bahnaswy, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

3
Subscribe