Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation

June 2, 2024 updated by: Adham Zakaria, Cairo University

Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Alternate hypothesis that treatment of Tempromandibular joint dislocation with Zirconium Dioxide eminoplasty will be more efficient than using titanium onlays in terms of decreasing maximum inter incisal distance and providing better soft tissue response and post-operative patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Adham Zakaria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with recurrent dislocation with maximum inter incisal opening over 55mm
  • Long-standing dislocation of the TMJ involving both fixation for more than 3 weeks and the failure of manual reduction
  • Failure of conservative strategies such as orientation to self-limit jaw movement and the use of a chin-cap or bandage
  • Both sexes
  • Age between 18 and 48 years.
  • Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis
  • Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease
  • pregnancy
  • psychological disorders, drug or alcohol dependency
  • Known allergies or sensitivities to dental materials, including Zirconia, Titanium or general anesthetic agents
  • Inability to return for follow up visits.
  • Refusal of participation from the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific Titanium onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants
Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific zirconium dioxide onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Maximal inter incisal distance between pre-operative and post-operative (mm)
Time Frame: 6 months
using a caliper the difference between preoperative and postoperative Maximal interincisal opening is recorded (mm)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
in terms of visual analogue scale (0-10)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohammed Kadry Nasr, Doctorate, Lecturer at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department, Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OMFS 3-3-4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Dislocation of Temporomandibular Joint (Disorder)

Clinical Trials on eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant

Subscribe