Comparison of Daytime Surgery in Varicose Veins Patients With and Without Superficial Venous Thrombosis

Comparison of Daytime Surgery in Varicose Veins Patients With and Without Superficial Venous Thrombosis: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Varicose veins of lower extremities are the most common disease in vascular surgery, and daytime surgery has gradually become the mainstream of varicose veins of lower extremities. Superficial venous thrombosis is one of the common complications of varicose veins of lower limbs. Current consensus is that patients with superficial venous thrombosis should be treated with standardized anticoagulant therapy to prevent their progression to venous thrombotic disease.SVT patients need standardized anticoagulant therapy for a period of time, while DS is current mainstream treatment of VV. Will the existence of SVT affect the safety and efficacy of DS of VV, leading a need of changing the treatment strategy and carrying out anticoagulant treatment for SVT before DS on VV patients? To date, there is no research on this issue. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively evaluate the safety, feasibility, perioperative and long-term efficacy of DS in VV patients complicated with SVT, and systematically compared patients who had VV only.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Varicose veins (VV) of lower extremities are common diseases in outpatient and inpatients. Approximately 25% of the world's adult population suffer from varicose veins of lower extremities, of which, the prevalence of VV in China reaches 8.9%, affecting more than 100 million people. From this, VV is a highly prevalent disease and one of the major public health problems in the world, placing huge economic and medical burden on both patients and health care.

Unlike inpatient surgery (IS), by which previous VV patients were mainly treated, Day surgery (DS), also known as ambulatory surgery,tends to exhibit higher medical efficacy and less cost of health care. Moreover, the development of endovenous treatment and sclerotherapy technology makes it feasible for clinicians to treat VV through DS. DS for VV patients can well alleviate the contradiction between the growth of medical demand and the shortage of medical resources, considering the fact that merely 4.3 beds are available per 1000 people on average in China.

Superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) of lower extremities, as a common complication of VV, is characterized by pain, erythema and usually palpable nodular mass of the diseased veins. Currently, VV still are the most common risk factor of SVT, despite SVT can exist independently. Previous studies have shown that the probability of SVT in VV patients ranges from 4% to 59%, while up to 80% of SVT patients are complicated with VV. SVT used to be considered as a self-limiting benign disease lacking in enough attention in clinical decision-making. However current researches show that SVT is closely related to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and especially when SVT involves the blood vessels connecting the deep venous system, the probability of VTE is as high as 18%, which seriously threatens the safety of patients. Due to the close relationship between SVT and VTE, the treatment of SVT is gaining its importance recent years. The latest guidelines of CHEST recommend 45 days of anticoagulant therapy for patients with SVT to reduce their risk of progressing to VTE, and surgery, including ligation of the great saphenofemoral joint or stripping of the superficial vein of thrombosis, is also applied in the treatment of SVT. SVT patients need standardized anticoagulant therapy for a period of time, while DS is current mainstream treatment of VV. Will the existence of SVT affect the safety and efficacy of DS of VV, leading a need of changing the treatment strategy and carrying out anticoagulant treatment for SVT before DS on VV patients? To date, there is no research on this issue.

It remains unclear whether the combination of SVT will have a negative impact on the DS of VV patients. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively evaluate the safety, feasibility, perioperative and long-term efficacy of DS in VV patients complicated with SVT, and systematically compared patients who had VV only. To reduce the possible selection bias, a propensity score matching model (PSM) was used to balance the baseline data of the two groups of patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

699

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a single center retrospective cohort study, which retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of VV patients treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2015 to 2021. Doppler ultrasound, combined with clinical examination, was used in the diagnosis of SVT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • VV patients with the CEAP grade of C2-C5;
  • At the age 18 to 75;
  • Treated by day surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of DVT or is suffering from DVT;
  • Patients with liver and renal failure;
  • Patients in hypercoagulable state;
  • Patients with anticoagulant therapy before operation;
  • Patients with active ulcer;
  • Patient is intolerant to foam sclerotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
SVT group
Varicose vein patients complicated with superficial thrombophlebitis
Non-SVT group
Patients had varicose vein only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative deep venous thrombosis
Time Frame: Events within one week after surgery
deep venous thrombosis after surgery
Events within one week after surgery
saphenous nerve injury
Time Frame: Events during surgery
saphenous nerve injury after surgery
Events during surgery
subcutaneous induration
Time Frame: Events within one week after surgery
subcutaneous induration after surgery
Events within one week after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
varicose veins recurrence
Time Frame: recurrence within 12 months follow-up after surgery
VV recurred during follow-up
recurrence within 12 months follow-up after surgery
superficial venous thrombosis formation
Time Frame: Events within 12 months follow-up after surgery
superficial venous thrombosis formatted during follow-up
Events within 12 months follow-up after surgery
deep venous thrombosis
Time Frame: Events within 12 months follow-up after surgery
deep venous thrombosis event during follow-up
Events within 12 months follow-up after surgery
skin burns
Time Frame: Events during surgery
skin burns after operation
Events during surgery
bleeding requiring intervention
Time Frame: Events during surgery
bleeding requiring intervention during operation
Events during surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Huang Kai, doctor, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 10, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SYSKY-2022-013-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Clinical treatment information that does not design patient privacy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe