Stress of Anesthesia Professionals in the Operating Room (StressBloc)

December 12, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between the resilience of anesthesia professionals in the operating room of the Grenoble University Hospital and perceived work-related stress.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This trial will be conducted at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA). Volunteer anesthesiologists, anesthesia interns, nurse anesthetists and nurse anesthetist students will answer questionnaires evaluating resilience, perceived stress in the last month, sleep quality, number of hours worked in the month, number of night hours and will evaluate each working day the perceived stress with the visual analogical scale of stress over 3 periods of the working day

The main objective is to determine if there is an association between the resilience (questionnaire: Connord davidson resielience scale: CDRISC10) of the anesthesia professionals in the block of the CHUGA and the perceived stress at work (Perceived stress sacle 10: PSS10).

The secondary objectives are to study the association between:

  1. The mean of the two stress VAS (at the beginning and end of the shift) collected and the PSS10 over the same period.
  2. The median of the peaks of stress VAS collected and the PSS10 over the same period.
  3. The PSS10 and the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
  4. The PSS10 and the number of hours worked in the month.
  5. The PSS10 and the number of night hours worked in the month.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Grenoble, France
        • University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

resident in anesthesiology, anesthesiologist, student nurse in anesthesia, volunteer nurse in anesthesia and working at the university hospital center grenoble alpes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • resident in anaesthesiology, Anesthesiologist,anaesthetic nursing student, anaesthetic nurse graduated

Criteria for non-inclusion:

  • Professionals objecting to the use of their data in the the research
  • Professionals working part-time
  • Professionals who had a number of CA > 3 during the month of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resilience
Time Frame: at day 0
Measurement of resilience by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD RISC 10 from 0 to 40) in participants. A high score indicates better resilience.
at day 0
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: at day 30
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10 from 10 To 50) measures the degree to which respondents feel their lives are unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded. A high score indicates more stress.
at day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported stress at the beginning of the workday.
Time Frame: Each work day at the start of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).
Each work day at the start of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
Self-reported stress at the end of the workday.
Time Frame: Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).
Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
Maximum self-reported stress of the workday.
Time Frame: Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).
Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.
The score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: at day 30
The PSQI contains 19 self-assessed questions. These 19 questions combine to yield 7 components: (1) subjective sleep quality, (2) sleep latency, (3) sleep duration, (4) habitual sleep efficiency, (5) sleep disturbance, (6) use of sleeping medication, and (7) daytime dysfunction. Each component gives a score from 0 to 3 points (0 indicates no difficulty, while 3 indicates major difficulty). The scores of the seven components are then added together to give an overall score of 0 to 21 points (0 indicating no difficulty, and 21 indicating major difficulty).
at day 30
number of hours worked
Time Frame: Each work day at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.
number of hours worked during the working day
Each work day at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.
number of hours worked at night
Time Frame: Each night of work at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.
the number of hours worked during the work night
Each night of work at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julien Picard, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB 00010254 - 2022 - 055

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Assessment of stress, resilience and associated factors in anesthesia professionals

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Gambia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe