- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05408793
Effects of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation on ASD
Evaluating the Efficacy of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) on Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)- a Double-blinded, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Primary objective:
Participants in the verum TPS group will have a significant reduction in CARS score at posttreatment compared with the sham TPS group.
Secondary objectives:
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant improvement in Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), compared with the sham TPS group.
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant improvement in the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), compared with the sham TPS group.
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant improvement in Faux Pas Recognition Test, compared with the sham TPS group.
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant improvement in Stroop test, compared with the sham TPS group.
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant improvement in Clinical global impression - severity and improvement scale (CGI-S and CGI -I) compared with the sham TPS group.
- Participants in the verum TPS group will have significant brain function connectivity at posttreatment fMRI and resting-state MRI compared to the sham TPS group.
Sample size Based on an RCT with similar design, the estimated effect size of rTMS is 0.5. By adapting an ANOVA 2x2 repeated measures with 95% significance and a power of 0.8, a sample size of 36 will be required in total (18 subjects per group).
Research plan and Methodology Methods Trial Design: In this study, the investigators will use a double-blind randomized controlled trial design with two-armed repeated measures. The trial design complies with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. In this two-armed design, investigators will use TPS as an intervention group and a waitlist control group. A sham-control group is appropriate for comparing the effect of the TPS on the intervention group to that of those not receiving the TPS treatment at the same timepoints Both groups will be measured at baseline (T1), immediately after the intervention (T2), at the 1-month (T3) and 3-month follow-up (T4). Based on the previous studies, a 3-month follow-up is sufficient to assess the long-term sustainability of the TPS intervention.
Intervention (Transcranial Pulse Stimulation) Purpose of the intervention: The key tenets of the TPS intervention is neuromodulation, i.e., using ultrasound-based brain stimulation techniques to modulate the human brain in a focal and targeted manner. Intervention dose: Each participant should have the pre-treatment MRI scan performed in the University Research Facility in Behavioural and Systems Neuroscience, PolyU prior coming to the first intervention session. All participants (both TPS group and the sham-control group) will receive six 30 minute-TPS sessions (800 pulse in each session, total: 4800 pulse) in 2 weeks' time. Participants will be followed up immediately after post-stimulation in Week 2, and at 1-month and 3- month period after the intervention. The investigators believe that a 2-week TPS intervention is sufficient enough to test the effects of TPS on autism symptoms.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
HongKong, Hong Kong
- School of Nursing HongKongPolyU
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 12 -17 years of age
- Chinese ethnicity
- Diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder that meets the criteria of the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
- No change in their management including medications or non-pharmacological intervention
- Currently taking prescribed psychotropic medications for ≥ 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- A DSM-5 diagnosis other than ASD
- Concomitant major medical or neurological conditions, such as significant global developmental delay, skull defect, abnormal mass or tumor, or epilepsy
- A CARS score ≤ 30 (i.e., no ASD)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS group)
Subjects in the TPS group will be given 6 verum TPS sessions (Pulse: 800 / session) across two weeks time, with 3 sessions per week.
|
A total of 36 participants (both TPS group and the sham-control group) will receive six 30 minute-TPS sessions (800 pulse in each session, total: 4800 pulse) in 2 weeks' time (i.e., 3 sessions (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) per week, total: 3 hours), on a 1: 1 allocation ratio.
Participants will be followed up immediately after the post-stimulation and at 1-month and 3-month period after the intervention.
A 2-week TPS intervention alongside with 3-month follow-up is sufficient enough to test the effects of TPS on autism symptoms.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham TPS Group
Subjects in the Sham TPS group will be given 6 sham TPS sessions across two weeks time, with 3 sessions per week.
|
A total of 36 participants (both TPS group and the sham-control group) will receive six 30 minute-TPS sessions (800 pulse in each session, total: 4800 pulse) in 2 weeks' time (i.e., 3 sessions (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) per week, total: 3 hours), on a 1: 1 allocation ratio.
Participants will be followed up immediately after the post-stimulation and at 1-month and 3-month period after the intervention.
A 2-week TPS intervention alongside with 3-month follow-up is sufficient enough to test the effects of TPS on autism symptoms.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Autism severity
Time Frame: Changes in CARS scores from baseline at 3 months
|
The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) is a 15-item behavioral rating scale developed to identify autism and examine its severity.
Total scores range from a low of 15 to a high of 60; scores below 30 indicate that the individual is in the non-autistic range, scores between 30 and 36.5 indicate mild to moderate autism, and scores from 37 to 60 indicate severe autism.
|
Changes in CARS scores from baseline at 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Autistic traits
Time Frame: Changes in AQ scores from baseline at 3 months
|
Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) - adolescent version is a quick and quantitative self-report instrument for assessing how many autistic traits any adult has.
The minimum score on the AQ is 0 and the maximum 50.
|
Changes in AQ scores from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Social deficits
Time Frame: Changes in SRS from baseline at 3 months
|
The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) is an instrument measuring the continuum of autism symptom severity which is commonly used in children and adolescents between the ages of 4 and 18 years.
Parents rate on each item on a 4-item Likert scale (0-4).
The higher the scores, the more severe the social deficits.
|
Changes in SRS from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Asperger's Syndrome
Time Frame: Changes in ASAS from baseline at 3 months
|
Australian scale for Asperger's syndrome (ASAS) is a scale used to screen the behaviours and abilities indicative of Asperger's Syndrome in subjects older than 6 years old.
It has 25 item and can be rated by parents/teachers/professionals who know the child.
|
Changes in ASAS from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Theory of Mind and Social Cognition
Time Frame: Changes in FPRT from baseline at 3 months
|
Faux Pas Recognition Test (FPRT) is a very common advanced test to measure the theory of mind and social cognition
|
Changes in FPRT from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Executive Function
Time Frame: Changes in Stroop test from baseline at 3 months
|
Stroop test is commonly used to assess the inhibition control component of executive function.
It is testing the subject's ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute.
|
Changes in Stroop test from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Working memory
Time Frame: Changes in WMTB from baseline at 3 months
|
Working Memory Test Battery (WMTB), which includes two verbal storage-only tasks (i.e.
digital recall and word list recall), two complex memory span tasks (i.e.
backward digit recall and counting recall), and two visuospatial storage tasks (block recall and variant- visual-pattern test).
|
Changes in WMTB from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Time Frame: Changes in WMTB from baseline at 3 months
|
CGI-S is a 7-point clinician rating scale is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behaviour, and function in the past seven days.
CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.
|
Changes in WMTB from baseline at 3 months
|
|
Neuroimaging
Time Frame: MRI will be assessed at baseline at immediately and 2 weeks after post-stimulation
|
Participants will receive pre and post treatment MRI scan to measure any changes in structural and functional connectivity changes in the brain.
|
MRI will be assessed at baseline at immediately and 2 weeks after post-stimulation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Teris Cheung, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HongKongPU_HSEARS20220228005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.