Tenofovir Alafenamide Switching Therapy in Kidney or Liver Transplant Recipients With Chronic HBV Infection

October 7, 2023 updated by: Taichung Veterans General Hospital

A Prospective Cohort Study of Tenofovir Alafenamide Switching Therapy in Kidney or Liver Transplant Recipients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has been approved to be highly effective and safe in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), therefore TAF may be a good option in kidney or liver transplant patients with chronic HBV infection. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and drug adherence improvement of TAF switching therapy in kidney or liver transplant patients with HBV infection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Life-long nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy has been recommended in patients with chronic HBV infection after organ transplantation, therefore the safety of long-term NA therapy is particularly important in transplant patients. Entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are recommended drugs for CHB patients in current guidelines because of their high potency in antiviral efficacy and low rate in virological resistance. However, the data of TAF therapy in transplant patients remain limited.

The potential nephrotoxicity and a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) of TDF therapy have been reported in previous studies. TAF is a novel prodrug of tenofovir and is formulated to deliver the active metabolite to target cells more efficiently than TDF at a much lower dose, thereby reducing systemic exposure to tenofovir. In the randomized controlled trials of TDF versus TAF showed that virological and serological results were similar in both arms. However, patients in TAF arm had improved renal effects and BMD as compared to TDF. Improvement in renal function and BMD were also found in chronic hepatitis B patients who switched from TDF to TAF. Furthermore, in some retrospective studies, switching from entecavir to TAF may present a superior efficacy in HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg level reduction, and renal safety was comparable between the TAF switch group and the entecavir continuation group. Interestingly, switching from entecavir to TAF is associated with improvement of the medication adherence, which may be particularly important to patients under long-term NA therapy.

The clinical data of TAF therapy in transplant patients remain very limited, particularly in kidney transplant patients. With a high virological response rate and a low adverse effect (AE) rate in patients with CHB, TAF may be a good option for patients underwent liver or kidney transplantation.The aim of this study is to assess the safety, drug adherence, and efficacy of TAF switching therapy in kidney or liver or transplant patients with chronic HBV infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Recruiting
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • Recruiting
        • China Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 20 years of age
  2. Chronic HBV infection under NA therapy other than TAF
  3. Underwent kidney and/ or liver transplantation
  4. Without clinical or pathologic evidence of moderate or severe rejection
  5. Patients who are indicated for TAF switching therapy, such as concerns in virological response, biochemical response, drug compliance, or safety issues to other NAs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. End stage renal disease (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73m2)
  2. Co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)
  3. Any active malignancies
  4. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  5. Known allergy to tenofovir-contained regimens

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TAF switching therapy cohort
A prospective single-arm cohort to evaluate the safety, drug adherence, and efficacy of TAF switching therapy in kidney or liver or transplant patients with chronic HBV infection.
To assess the safety, efficacy, and drug adherence improvement of TAF switching therapy in kidney or liver transplant patients with HBV infection.
Other Names:
  • TAF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Time Frame: week 144
0-120 ml/min/1.73m2 (higher scores mean a better outcome)
week 144
Bone mineral density
Time Frame: week 144
0-5 g/cm2; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (higher scores mean a better outcome)
week 144

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV viral load
Time Frame: week 144
0-8 log10 IU/mL; blood HBV DNA level (higher scores mean a worse outcome)
week 144
Alanine aminotransferase
Time Frame: week 144
0-150000 IU/mL; blood ALT level (higher scores mean a worse outcome)
week 144
Quantitative HBsAg
Time Frame: week 144
0-10000 IU/mL; blood qHBsAg level (higher scores mean a worse outcome)
week 144
Liver fibrosis elastography
Time Frame: week 144
0-30 kPa; ultrasound elastography (higher scores mean a worse outcome)
week 144
Drug adherence score
Time Frame: week 144 (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Score 1-8; Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 questionnaire
week 144 (higher scores mean a better outcome)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Teng-Yu Lee, MD, PhD, Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 22, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Safety Issues

Clinical Trials on Tenofovir Alafenamide 25 MG

3
Subscribe