Efficacy and Safety of SOF/VEL + RBV and SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 Weeks in HCV Subjects With GT3b and Compensated Cirrhosis

July 20, 2022 updated by: Huiying Rao, Peking University People's Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Plus Ribavirin for 12 Weeks or Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir for 12 Weeks in DAA Treatment Naïve HCV Subjects With GT3b, Compensated Cirrhosis in China

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) targeting HCV have revolutionized the treatment of HCV. The efficacy of DAA-based therapy can depend on patient-related factors such as treatment experience, cirrhosis, but also on viral genotype. The high prevalence of genotype 3, which is considered difficult to cure, remains a challenge because many oral DAAs are less effective for this genotype, particularly subtype 3b than for others. Current guidance generally recommends sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) ± ribavirin (RBV), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir (VOX) as first-line therapy for genotype 3, and an interferon-based regimen - SOF plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin is still recommended as an alternative treatment option. These recommendations are based on clinical data generated in regions where genotype 3a predominates. Our recent study indicated that sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks in subjects with HCV genotype 3 infection resulted in high rates of SVR. However, the SVR12 rate among subjects with genotype 3b was lower than that observed in subjects with genotype 3a infection, particularly among treatment-experienced subjects with cirrhosis.

Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL plus RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks in DAAs treatment naïve HCV subjects with GT3b, compensated cirrhosis in China.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which may lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Genotype 3 is the second most common genotype globally, accounting for approximately 18% of all adult HCV infections. Subjects with HCV genotype 3 infection, particularly genotype 3b, have a greater risk of developing hepatic steatosis, more rapid progression of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although there is only a small percentage of HCV subjects with genotype 3 in East Asia (5.4%) and China (8.7%), genotype 3b represents more than 50% of genotype 3 subjects in China,compared to most other regions of the world where genotype 3a predominates. In certain provinces of China, such as Yunnan Guizhou, and Chongqing, genotype 3b is the predominant HCV subtype among genotype 3 subjects.

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) targeting HCV have revolutionized the treatment of HCV. The efficacy of DAA-based therapy can depend on patient-related factors such as treatment experience, cirrhosis, but also on viral genotype. The high prevalence of genotype 3, which is considered difficult to cure, remains a challenge because many oral DAAs are less effective for this genotype, particularly subtype 3b than for others. Current guidance generally recommends sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) ± ribavirin (RBV), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir (VOX) as first-line therapy for genotype 3, and an interferon-based regimen - SOF plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin is still recommended as an alternative treatment option. These recommendations are based on clinical data generated in regions where genotype 3a predominates. Our recent study indicated that sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks in subjects with HCV genotype 3 infection resulted in high rates of SVR. However, the SVR12 rate among subjects with genotype 3b was lower than that observed in subjects with genotype 3a infection, particularly among treatment-experienced subjects with cirrhosis.

Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL plus RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks in DAAs treatment naïve HCV subjects with GT3b, compensated cirrhosis in China.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  2. Male or female, age ≥18 years
  3. Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0-35.0kg/m2 and bodyweight ≥ 40 kg
  4. Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy
  5. Anti-HCV positive at screening
  6. HCV RNA 104 IU/mL at screening by the Central Laboratory
  7. HCV genotype 3b assessed at screening by the Central Laboratory
  8. DAA treatment naïve defined as having never been exposed to approved or experimental HCV-specific direct-acting antiviral agents. Pegylated interferon/interferon based prior treatment is allowed.
  9. Cirrhosis Determination: cirrhosis is defined as any one of the following:

    1. Liver biopsy showing cirrhosis (e.g., Metavir score = 4 or Ishak score ≥5) in 24 months before screening, or
    2. Fibroscan® with a result of >12.5 kPa in 6 months before screening
  10. The lab test at screening should meet all the criterion below: a) ALT ≤ 10 the upper limit of normal (ULN); b) AST ≤ 10 ULN; c) Total bilirubin ≤ 2 ULN; d) Platelets ≥ 60,000/L; e) Neutrophile ≥ 1,500/L; f) HbA1c ≤ 8.5%; g) Creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≥ 60 mL /min as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation; h) Hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL for female subjects; ≥ 12 g/dL for male subjects; i) Albumin ≥ 3 g/dL; j) INR ≤ 1.7 x ULN; k) AFP <100ng/mL;if 20ng/mL≤AFP≤100ng/mL,HCC should be exclude by liver ultrasound
  11. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening
  12. Male subjects and female subjects of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception
  13. Male subjects must agree to avoid donating sperm in 6 months after the last dose of drug
  14. Subject must be of generally good health, with the exception of chronic HCV infection, as determined by the Investigator
  15. Subject must be able to comply with the dosing instructions for study drug administration and able to complete the study schedule of assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Decompensated cirrhosis, including but not limited to: prior or current ascites, variceal hemorrhage and/or hepatic encephalopathy; prior or current Child-Pugh B or C
  2. HBsAg posititve at screening
  3. Anti-HIV positive at screening
  4. Alcohol abuse
  5. Contraindication of ribavirin, including but not limited to hemoglobinapathy
  6. Pregnant or nursing female or male with pregnant female partner
  7. Use of any prohibited concomitant medications as described in Section before screening
  8. Known hypersensitivity to SOF, VEL, RBV or formulation excipients
  9. Subjects who has any of the following history: a) Chronic liver disease of a non-HCV etiology (e.g., hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency, cholangitis); b) Solid organ transplantation; c) Significant pulmonary disease, significant cardiac disease or porphyria; d) Pancreatitis; e) Autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, psoriasis); f) Psychiatric hospitalization, suicide attempt, and/or a period of disability as a result of their psychiatric illness within the last 5 years; g) Malignancy within the 5 years prior to screening, with the exception of specific cancers that have been cured by surgical resection (basal cell skin cancer, etc). Subjects under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible; h) Significant drug allergy (such as anaphylaxis or hepatotoxicity).
  10. Assessed as ineligible by investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Sofosbuvir 400mg/velpatasvir 100mg + ribavirin 1000mg/1200mg for 12 weeks
Sofosbuvir 400mg/velpatasvir 100mg + ribavirin 1000mg/1200mg for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Epclusa
Experimental: Arm 2
Sofosbuvir 400mg/velpatasvir 100mg/voxilaprevir 100mg for 12 weeks
Sofosbuvir 400mg/velpatasvir 100mg/voxilaprevir 100mg for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Vosevi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of participants with SVR12
Time Frame: 12 weeks post treatment.
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with SOF/VEL plus RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks in DAA treatment naïve HCV participants with GT3b, participants initiated on treatment will be assessed for viral load response at 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12). We use the proportion of participants with SVR12 as primary outcome measure.
12 weeks post treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Treatment start date through treatment completion (up to 24 weeks).
Number of Participants With treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0- SOF/VEL plus RBV vs. SOF/VEL/VOX.
Treatment start date through treatment completion (up to 24 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huiying Rao, Dr., Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe