Improving Care for Women With Urinary Incontinence (EMPOWER)

April 14, 2026 updated by: Adonis Hijaz, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Empowering Women and Providers for Improved Care of Urinary Incontinence (UI) [EMPOWER Study]

The overall goal is to improve diagnosis and non-operative management of urinary incontinence in women.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the study, patients will be screened in primary care offices for symptoms of urinary incontinence. Women with positive screening results will be asked if they are interested in participating in an implementation study where women will be assigned to one of the three following groups:

  1. Usual Care plus Patient Educational Opportunities - The patient's urinary incontinence will be managed using standard of care treatment by the patient's primary care provider. Patients will be offered educational opportunities about urinary incontinence.
  2. Nurse Navigation - Along with the treatment described for "Usual Care plus Patient Educational Opportunities," a nurse navigator will work with the patient to implement behavioral changes and provide education and physical therapy options. In addition, the navigator will be available to answer the patient's questions in a timely fashion and help the patient move through the care pathway.
  3. Nurse Navigation and ChatBot - Along with the treatment described for "Usual Care plus Patient Educational Opportunities" and "Nurse Navigation," this group will include a ChatBot feature which will allow a patient to directly and privately communicate with an artificial intelligence-driven ChatBot, also known as a "conversational agent," that will provide education and help the patient navigate the care pathway.

All participants will complete questionnaires throughout their enrollment and data will be collected from medical records. The study team will analyze the data at six months after the original appointment/study enrollment, assess adherence to therapy and how the therapy impacted the outcomes the team hopes to improve, such as improvement in symptoms. The study will be implemented over three subsequent time periods called Wave 1, Wave 2 and Wave 3 with primary care practices from two geographic regions being involved in each wave (6 regions total). Participants in Wave 1 will be followed for a total of 18 months, while participants in Wave 2 will be followed for a total of 12 months, and participants in Wave 3 will be followed for 6 months. Primary care providers at all participating practices will be offered educational opportunities related to urinary incontinence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patient having a primary care provider visit at University Hospitals (UH) Cleveland Primary Care Institute (PCI)
  2. ≥ 18 years old
  3. Scores 1 or higher on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF)

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Patient Education
Patients will be provided educational opportunities.
Other Names:
  • Education
Experimental: Arm 2
Patient Education + Nurse Navigation
Patients will be provided educational opportunities.
Other Names:
  • Education
A nurse navigator will work with the participants to help them navigate the care pathway. The navigator will provide education and recommendations for treatment options.
Experimental: Arm 3
Patient Education + Nurse Navigation + ChatBot
Patients will be provided educational opportunities.
Other Names:
  • Education
A nurse navigator will work with the participants to help them navigate the care pathway. The navigator will provide education and recommendations for treatment options.
A ChatBot will allow participants to directly and privately communicate through a smartphone (or other device) with an artificial intelligence-driven ChatBot, also known as a "conversational agent," that will provide education and encouragement to manage their symptoms.
Other Names:
  • Behavioral/exercise via chatbot

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patients' UI Symptoms as Measured by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each wave
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) assess frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of patients' urinary incontinence symptoms. The result of the ICIQ-UI SF is a composite score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe incontinence.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each wave
Patients' UI Symptoms as Measured by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) assess frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of patients' urinary incontinence symptoms. The result of the ICIQ-UI SF is a composite score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe incontinence.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' UI Symptoms as Measured by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) assess frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of patients' urinary incontinence symptoms. The result of the ICIQ-UI SF is a composite score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe incontinence.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Change in Patients' Perceived Self-efficacy for UI Communication as Measured by the PEPPI
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Patients' perceived confidence in their ability to communicate their health concerns around UI will be assessed by the Patient-Perceived Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) Questionnaire modified for UI. The PEPPI total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Patients' Perceived Self-efficacy for UI Communication as Measured by the PEPPI
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only lasted 6 months, not 12)
Patients' perceived confidence in their ability to communicate their health concerns around UI will be assessed by the Patient- Perceived Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) Questionnaire modified for UI. The PEPPI total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only lasted 6 months, not 12)
Patients' Perceived Self-efficacy for UI Communication as Measured by the PEPPI
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Patients' perceived confidence in their ability to communicate their health concerns around UI will be assessed by the Patient- Perceived Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) Questionnaire modified for UI. The PEPPI total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Patient Empowerment as Measured by Number of Participants That Answered Yes to Speaking With Their Provider About UI.
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) in all Waves
Patient empowerment will be measured by a patient survey to measure with percentage of patients answering yes to speaking with their provider about UI.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) in all Waves
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptom Severity as Measured by the OABSS
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Patients' overactive bladder symptom severity will be assessed by the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). The OABSS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Overactive Bladder Symptom Severity as Measured by the OABSS
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participant only last 6 months, not 12)
Patients' overactive bladder symptom severity will be assessed by the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). The OABSS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participant only last 6 months, not 12)
Overactive Bladder Symptom Severity as Measured by the OABSS
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 and 3 participants)
Overactive bladder symptom severity will be assessed by the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). The OABSS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 and 3 participants)
Change in Urinary Symptoms as Measured by the UDI-6
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
How bothersome a patient's urinary symptoms are will be assessed by the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The UDI-6 total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by the UDI-6
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only lasted 6 months, not 12)
How bothersome a patient's urinary symptoms are will be assessed by the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The UDI-6 total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only lasted 6 months, not 12)
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by the UDI-6
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
How bothersome a patient's urinary symptoms are will be assessed by the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The UDI-6 total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Change in Impact of UI on Patients' Quality of Life as Measured by the ICIQ-LUTSqol
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life will be assessed by the Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). The ICIQ-LUTSqol total score ranges from 19 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased impact on quality of life.
Baseline (immediately prior to start of intervention) and Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Impact of UI on Patients' Quality of Life as Measured by the ICIQ-LUTSqol
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)
The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life will be assessed by the Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). The ICIQ-LUTSqol total score ranges from 19 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased impact on quality of life.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)
Impact of UI on Patients' Quality of Life as Measured by the ICIQ-LUTSqol
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life will be assessed by the Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). The ICIQ-LUTSqol total score ranges from 19 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased impact on quality of life.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Change in Patients' Perceived Symptom Improvement as Measured by Number of Participants Who Chose 1-3 on the PGI-I Scale.
Time Frame: Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Patients' perceived improvement in UI symptoms will be assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). PGI-I measures improvement on a scale of 1 "very much better" to 7 "very much worse." Reported outcome measure is the number of participants that scored better (1, 2, or 3) at each time point. For improvement it was calculated the number of participants who chose 1-3 only.
Months 2 and 6 post start of intervention in each Wave
Change in Patients' Perceived Symptom Improvement as Measured by Number of Participants Who Chose 1-3 on the PGI-I Scale.
Time Frame: 12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)
Patients' perceived improvement in UI symptoms will be assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). PGI-I measures improvement on a scale of 1 "very much better" to 7 "very much worse." Reported outcome measure is the number of participants that scored better (1, 2, or 3) at each time point. For improvement it was calculated the number of participants who chose 1-3 only.
12 months post start of intervention in Waves 1 and 2 (no data collected for Wave 3 participants because participation only last 6 months, not 12)
Change in Patients' Perceived Symptom Improvement as Measured by Number of Participants Who Chose 1-3 on the PGI-I Scale.
Time Frame: 18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Patients' perceived improvement in UI symptoms will be assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). PGI-I measures improvement on a scale of 1 "very much better" to 7 "very much worse." Reported outcome measure is the number of participants that scored better (1, 2, or 3) at each time point. For improvement it was calculated the number of participants who chose 1-3 only.
18 months post start of intervention in Wave 1 (no data collected for Wave 2 because participants only participated for 12 months, not 18. Also no data collected for wave 3 participants because they only participated for 6 months, not 18)
Number of Practices That Maintain a UI Management Intervention as Measured by the Practice Survey
Time Frame: 1 month post completion of each Wave's enrollment period (7 months from beginning of screening period of each Wave)
Maintenance of UI management intervention will be assessed by practice survey completed by participant at the practice with indication of continuation for each intervention component.
1 month post completion of each Wave's enrollment period (7 months from beginning of screening period of each Wave)
Number of Practices That Implement a UI Point Person as Measured by the Practice Survey
Time Frame: 1 month post completion of each Wave's enrollment period (7 months from beginning of screening for each Wave)
Implementation of a UI point person will be measured as a percentage of sites answer yes on practice survey.
1 month post completion of each Wave's enrollment period (7 months from beginning of screening for each Wave)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Goutham Rao, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Adonis Hijaz, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be made available after de-identification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal may use the data for any purpose.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Patient Education

Subscribe