Treatment of Non-resectable Bile Duct Cancer With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy (CARP)

February 9, 2024 updated by: Albrecht Hoffmeister, University of Leipzig

Cholangiocarcinoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Bile duct cancer is often diagnosed after curative options are no longer available. Stent therapy is used to keep the ducts open and can be combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) to extend life expectancy. PDT requires an injection of photosensitizer after which light of a particular wavelength is applied endoscopically to kill the cancer cells. Drawbacks include not only high costs and poor availability, but foremost that patients have to avoid direct sunlight for a period of weeks. Radio frequency ablation (RFA) together with stent implantation constitutes an alternative by which the cancer cells are killed through heat, also applied endoscopically. The RFA technology is more widely available and easier to deploy. However, it has not been studied extensively and no randomized trials exist comparing the two methods. This trial will compare survival in patients with a particular bile duct cancer depending on whether they receive PDT or RFA. Moreover, data will be collected on side-effects and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Klatskin tumours are a form of bile duct cancer. They are generally not diagnosed until quite late and a curative operation is rarely a possibility. Their anatomic location usually results in bile duct obstruction and the aim of therapy is thus to keep the ducts open. This is accomplished through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by implanting stents. Stent therapy combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) extends life expectancy. PDT requires an injection of photosensitizer that is absorbed primarily by the cancer cells. Light of a particular wavelength is then applied with ERCP to kill the cancer cells. Drawbacks include not only high costs and poor availability, but foremost that patients have to avoid direct sunlight for a period of weeks. Radio frequency ablation (RFA) together with stent implantation constitutes an alternative by which the cancer cells are killed through heat applied during ERCP. The RFA technology is more widely available and easier to deploy. However, it has not been studied extensively and no randomized trials exist comparing the two methods. This trial will compare survival in patients with Klatskin tumours depending on whether they receive PDT or RFA. Moreover, data will be collected on side-effects and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

258

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Medizinische Klinik III
        • Contact:
      • Augsburg, Germany, 86156
      • Berlin, Germany, 10249
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH, Klinikum Friedrichshain, Innere Medizin/Gastroenterologie
        • Contact:
      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
        • Contact:
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik 1
        • Contact:
          • Jörg Trojan, Prof. Dr.
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Klinik II, Abteilung Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie & lnfektiologie
        • Contact:
          • Armin Küllmer, Dr.
      • Greifswald, Germany, 17475
      • Halle, Germany, 06120
        • Recruiting
        • Site: Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I
        • Contact:
      • Hanau, Germany, 63450
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Hanau; Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Infektiologie
        • Contact:
      • Hannover, Germany, 30459
        • Recruiting
        • KRH Klinikum Siloah, Klinik für Gastroenterologie
        • Contact:
      • Leipzig, Germany
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04109
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH; Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Diabetologie und Endokrinologie
        • Contact:
      • Ludwigsburg, Germany, 71640
        • Recruiting
        • RKH Kliniken Ludwigsburg- Bietigheim gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hämato-Onkologie, Diabetologie und Infektiologie
        • Contact:
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, II. Medizinische Klinik
        • Contact:
      • Marburg, Germany, 35043
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH (UKGM); Klinik für Innere Medizin mit den Schwerpunkten Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie
        • Contact:
      • München, Germany, 81377
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Klinikum der LMU München, Medizinische Klinik II, Campus Großhadern
        • Contact:
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitlitsklinikum Munster Medizinische Klinik B (Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie, Klinische lnfektiologie)
        • Contact:
      • Nürnberg, Germany, 90419
      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70376
        • Recruiting
        • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus (RBK) Stuttgart; Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie
        • Contact:
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (cytological or histological confirmation)
  2. Surgery is not planned
  3. Age ≥ 18 years
  4. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tumour not accessible endoscopically
  2. Known hypersensitivity to porphyrins or to any of the other ingredients of the photosensitizer chosen
  3. Leukopenia (< 2000/mm3)
  4. Thrombocytopenia (< 100,000 / mm³)
  5. Severe, uncorrected coagulopathy (at the discretion of the physician)
  6. Suspected erosion of major blood vessels, because of the risk of life-threatening mass haemorrhage exists
  7. Porphyria (clinician's assessment) or other light-exacerbated diseases
  8. Severely impaired liver and or kidney function (at the discretion of the physician)
  9. Bedridden for more than 50% of the time (similar to ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) grade 3)
  10. Planned surgical procedure within the next 30 days
  11. Concurrent eye disease that will require a slit lamp examination within the next 30 days
  12. Prior radiotherapy within the last four weeks
  13. Previous PDT or RFA
  14. Planned liver transplantation
  15. Fertile women (within two years of their last menstruation) without appropriate contraceptive measures (implanon, injections, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, partner with vasectomy) while participating in the trial (participants using a hormone-based method have to be informed of possible effects of the trial medication on contraception)
  16. Participation in other interventional trials
  17. Patients under legal supervision or guardianship
  18. Pregnant or nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Photodynamic therapy (PDT)
The index procedure in all patients at baseline includes stenting, using an endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) procedure. The Intervention is at least one PDT at baseline according to the clinical routine of the trial site.
A photosensitizer, which is absorbed preferentially by tumour cells, is administered 24 - 48 hours prior to PDT. Light of a particular wavelength is then applied during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to kill primarily cancer cells locally within the stenosis. Immediately after PDT treatment, new stents are inserted into all treated segments if needed.
Other Names:
  • Photodynamic therapy (PDT)
Experimental: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
The index procedure in all patients at baseline includes stenting, using an endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) procedure. The Intervention is at least one RFA at baseline according to the clinical routine of the trial site.
RFA is also carried out as part of an ERCP. The RFA-probe is placed within the tumour stenosis and electrical current is applied. New stents are inserted into all treated segments if needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Hazard ratio from a Cox regression model will be used to compare randomization arms. Covariates will be stratification variables, classification of local inoperability, use of prophylactic antibiotics, Bismuth type and time between diagnosis and beginning RFA/PDT.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (complementary perspective: median survival time)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Estimates of the difference in median survival time between the groups will be based on the method of Chen and Zhang (PMID: 26983640).
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Overall survival (complementary perspective: two-year overall survival)
Time Frame: up to two years
Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.
up to two years
Overall survival (complementary perspective: restricted mean survival on a time horizon of two-years)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used (see e.g. PMID: 15690989)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Days alive and out of hospital up to two years
Time Frame: up to two years
This constitutes a basic and easy to understand measure of quality of life. Only in-hospital stays will be included in this endpoint and the day of arrival and dismissal will each be counted. The source of data will be the hospital records, epicrisis and patient disclosure.
up to two years
Quality of Life (QoL) measured using QLQ-C30 at various points in time after randomization (V2 (14 days), V3 (ca. 3 months), as a function of time after 6 months, adjusting for the baseline value)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Prolonging life is especially worthwhile if QoL is sufficiently good. The established cancer-specific Core Quality of Life questionnaire QLQ-C30 from the EORTC (European Organisation for Research will be used. Shortly after the index therapy (V2, V3), the difference between arms will be assessed. The requirement to stay indoors may affect QoL. At later points in time, a description per arm is of interest and will be based on a weighted mean of all available questionnaires, weighting according to calendar time.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of Life (QoL) measured using FACT-Hep at various points in time after randomization (V2 (14 days), V3 (ca. 3 months), as a function of time after 6 months, adjusting for the baseline value)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Prolonging life is especially worthwhile if QoL is sufficiently good. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire, containing the hepatobiliary-specific cancer subscale, will be used as a second instrument for assessing QoL. Shortly after the index therapy (V2, V3), the difference between arms will be assessed. The requirement to stay indoors may affect QoL. At later points in time, a description per arm is of interest and will be based on a weighted mean of all available questionnaires, weighting according to calendar time.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Using QALYs, a weighted measure of survival will be compared between RFA and PDT that takes QoL into account. The details will be provided in a Statistical Analysis Plan.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Stent patency based on clinician's assessment (e.g. cholangitis, cholestasis, ultrasound)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Stent patency provides one measure of the burden of the disease and efficacy of the treatment. Mean time to stent closure/replacement/death after last stent replacement will be analysed.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (leucocytes)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (haematocrit)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (haemoglobin)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (bilirubin)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (albumin)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (CA 19-9)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (CRP)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (ALT)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Laboratory parameter (GGT)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pruritus as reported by patients on a scale from 0 ("no itching") to 10 ("worst imaginable itching").
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pruritus will be analysed as a function of time.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Albrecht Hoffmeister, Prof.Dr.med., Universitätsklinikum Leipzig; Bereich Gastroenterologie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CARP
  • 2022-500107-50-00 (Other Identifier: EU CT Number (EMA))
  • 434336116 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Photosensitizer

3
Subscribe