Problem Solving Treatment for Diabetes in Individuals With Poor Diabetes Control (RESONATE)

December 12, 2022 updated by: Ecosse Lamoureux, Singapore Eye Research Institute

RESONATE: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Problem Solving Treatment for Diabetes in Individuals With Poor Diabetes Control

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to test a cognitive-behavioural intervention, Problem Solving Treatment for Diabetes (PST-D) in patients with type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of PST-D compared with the attention control group.
  • To determine the impact of PST-D on patient-centred, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes.
  • To identify independent factors associated with an improvement in HbA1c and reductions in incidence and progression diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and visual impairment at 18-month follow-up in both groups; and determine if these factors mediate the associations between the PST-D intervention with the above outcomes.
  • To quantify the incremental cost-effectiveness of PST-D compared with the attention control group at 18-month follow-up.
  • To understand participants' views, experiences, and opinions about PST-D; and the barriers and facilitators to program completion.

Participants will complete blood tests, ocular examinations, and a series of questionnaires at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up. Participants will also complete the intervention/ control group sessions conducted over the phone, video call, or face-to-face depending on the participant's preference.

Researchers will compare the intervention group against the attention control group to determine the effectiveness of PST-D on improving clinical, patient-centred, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Assuming the recent rise in obesity prevalence persists, the lifetime risk of diabetes in Singapore will almost double by 2050. Poorly controlled diabetes leads to various diabetes-related complications which may consequently require costly lifelong treatment and have a profound impact on patients' quality of life.

Based on a previous trial on problem solving therapy in people with diabetic retinopathy and significant levels of distress, the investigators have designed a cognitive-behavioural intervention which aims to teach individuals skills to cope with and solve problems related to diabetes self-management. This novel intervention will be carried out at one tertiary hospital in Singapore, with the option for interested community-dwelling individuals with diabetes to participate, to facilitate its implementation and transition to the real world setting to assist patients with diabetes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169856
        • Singapore Eye Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 106 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes and at least 1 recent reading of suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.0%)
  • Able to speak English and/or Mandarin
  • Singapore citizens or those with Singapore permanent residency status
  • Aged 21 years and above
  • No cognitive impairment, as assessed using the 6-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT)
  • Adequate hearing with/without hearing aids to respond to normal conversation
  • Consent to participate in the sessions if randomised to the PST-D treatment arm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have hearing or cognitive impairment compromising consent or study procedures
  • All recent HbA1c readings are <7.0%
  • Uncontactable or unwilling/unable to participate in all the PST-D sessions if randomised to the PST-D group

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (PST-D)
Participants in the intervention group will receive usual care comprising of routine follow-up checks from their hospitals on top of the intervention (PST-D). The intervention consists of one introductory session, up to eight weekly treatment sessions, and three monthly maintenance sessions; these are individual sessions of approximately 30 to 45 minutes each and will be conducted over the phone, video call, or face-to-face depending on the participant's preference.

In the introductory session, the structure of and rationale behind PST-D will be explained. The specialist will work with the participant to develop a problem list related to diabetes self-management and smoking cessation, if applicable.

During the weekly sessions, the participant will be taught and guided through the seven steps of problem solving:

  1. Clarifying and defining the problem
  2. Setting a realistic goal
  3. Brainstorming multiple solutions
  4. Generating pros and cons for each solution
  5. Evaluating and choosing a preferred solution
  6. Developing a specific action plan to implement the solution
  7. Evaluating outcomes from the previous session.

Participants will also plan to engage in at least 1 enjoyable activity daily during the week.

The number of sessions will differ based on the specialist's assessment of the participant's problem-solving skills.

Maintenance sessions will be delivered monthly across 3 months in order to follow-up with participants.

Active Comparator: Attention control group
The participants in the control group will receive usual care comprising of routine follow-up checks from their hospitals. They will also receive one introductory session and up to eight weekly treatment sessions; these are individual sessions of approximately 30 to 45 minutes each and will be conducted over the phone, video call, or face-to-face depending on the participant's preference.
During the sessions, the healthcare practitioners will provide general information and recommendations on general health topics such as oral health, hearing loss, sleep, dementia, adult vaccination, influenza, and dengue fever. Participants will also be given handouts adapted from government agencies and/or public bodies, such as HealthHub, National Health Service, National Addictions Management Service, and National Environmental Agency, on these topics. The healthcare practitioners will avoid discussing topics related to diabetes, diet, physical activity, and medication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Blood test
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Blood tests
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Grading of digital retinal photographs and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Incidence and progression of diabetic nephropathy
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Blood tests results of epidermal growth factor receptor from serum creatinine and estimated using the CKD-EPI equation
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Incidence and progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination (SWME) results
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Incidence and progression of distance visual impairment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Pinhole visual acuity values
Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Change in diabetes self-efficacy over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Perceived Diabetes Self-management scale.

Minimum value: 8 Maximum value: 40

Higher scores indicate more confidence in self-managing one's diabetes.

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Change in problem-focused coping self-efficacy over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Problem-Focusing subscale from Coping Self-Efficacy Scale

Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 120

Higher scores indicate higher level of problem-focused coping self-efficacy.

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Change in diabetes self-care activities over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Diabetes Self-management Questionnaire

Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 12

Higher values indicate more effective self-care.

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Change in medication taking behaviour over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence

It comprises two domains - the extent of and reasons for medication non-adherence over the past 7 days.

For the Extent of Non-Adherence domain, the overall score is calculated by the average score of the three items, with higher scores indicating greater levels of non-adherence (Minimum value: 0; Maximum value: 4).

There are 18 items in the Reasons for Non-Adherence domain which stand on their own as descriptors. The reasons scale is a causal indicator model and higher scores indicate greater endorsement of each reason for non-adherence (Minimum value: 0; Maximum value: 4).

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Change in diabetes-related quality of life over 18 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Asian Diabetes Quality of Life

Minimum value: 18 (English version); 15 (Chinese version) Maximum value: 105 (English version); 90 (Chinese version)

Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month
Cost-effectiveness of PST-D
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

EQ-5D-5L

There are five dimensions in the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to the five dimensions are used to calculate an index score ranging from -0.59 for the worst health state to 1.00 for perfect health. A score of 0 represents death and a negative score indicates a state worse than death.

Baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ecosse Lamoureux, PhD, Singapore Eye Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Problem Solving Treatment for Diabetes

Subscribe