Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy Vs TAU for Adjustment Disorder Following Traumatic Event Exposure

Comparative Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy Vs TAU for Adjustment Disorder Following Traumatic Event Exposure

Adjustment Disorder (AjD) is the most common mental health condition diagnosed in Active Duty personnel, and is diagnosed following an extreme stress event such as traumatic loss of a comrade, serious accident or injury, or other intense stress event. Despite its high prevalence, no evidence based treatment for AjD has been subjected to randomized controlled trials. This study seeks to build on the research team's pilot work across several disorders study to benefit service members and Veterans with AjD, a highly prevalent but frequently inadequately treated condition.

The investigators will compare the effects of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) vs treatment as usual which is Moving Forward Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST) on AjD symptom outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that TBT will result in greater overall symptom reduction compared to TAU-PST.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Mental Disorder; Adjustment Disorders
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT); Behavioral: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST)

Detailed Description

Adjustment Disorder (AjD) is the most common mental health condition diagnosed in Active Duty personnel, and is diagnosed following an extreme stress event such as traumatic loss of a comrade, serious accident or injury, or other intense stress event. Despite its high prevalence, no evidence based treatment for AjD has been subjected to randomized controlled trials.

Currently, the VA suggests a problem solving cognitive behavioral therapy, but this recommendation is not based on replicated, randomized controlled trials. Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT), is based on key 'active components' of existing evidence based treatments such as Prolonged Exposure and Behavioral Activation, has been designed by this research team to be easily trained and inexpensively disseminated, and has been evaluated in a series of pilots with anxiety and depression disorders that, importantly, represent the key symptom classes of adjustment disorder.

Thus, the rationale for the proposed trial is that the research team has done preliminary efficacy testing of an easily exportable intervention that has impact on the key symptoms of adjustment disorder, and the standard of evidence demands replicated, randomized controlled trials to determine if initial signals of positive effect are sustained.

The study will use a 2 group repeated measures randomized controlled design to evaluate effectiveness of TBT for AjD compared to treatment as usual (TAU-PST). Participants will be randomly assigned in equal numbers (n = 75; N = 150) to one of two treatment arms: (1) TBT or (2) TAU-PST. Participants assigned to TBT will receive 6, 30-45-minute, manualized, individual therapy sessions. Participants assigned to TAU-PST will receive 6, 30-45-minute sessions of Problem-Solving Therapy. Dependent measures will include Department of Defense (DoD) specified common data elements and specific measures of AjD, PTSD, anxiety, depression, and functioning collected by blinded assessors at baseline, post-treatment, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 150
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Stephanie M Hart, MPH; Phone Number: 205103 8435775011; Email: stephanie.hart4@va.gov

Study Locations

• United States
  • South Carolina
    • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401
      • Recruiting
      • Ralph H. Johnson VA Health Care System
      • Contact: Stephanie M Hart, MPH; Phone Number: 8433015799; Email: stephanie.hart4@va.gov
      • Contact: Michelle Pompei, MPH; Phone Number: 843-471-4751; Email: michelle.pompei@va.gov
      • Contact: Ron Acierno, PhD
      • Contact: Daniel Gros, PhD

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult male or female over the age of 18 that has served, or is currently serving, in the military.
• Stable psychotropic medication for at least 4 weeks if applicable
• Current DSM-5 diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

• Active psychosis
• Suicidal ideation with clear intent
• Severe substance use

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT); Participants will receive 6, 30-45-minute, manualized, individual therapy sessions.	Behavioral: Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT); TBT manualized treatment incorporates daily exposure exercises from up to four categories of avoidance that are most characteristic of the emotional disorders (i.e., situational, interoceptive, imaginal, and positive emotional).
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST); Participants will receive 6, 30-45-minute, manualized, individual therapy sessions.	Behavioral: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST); PST is an evidence- based psychotherapy implemented in VA Primary Care - Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI), with hundreds of VA providers trained in the intervention nationally. The primary aim of PST is to improve a patient's ability to cope with stressful events by adopting an adaptive perspective to stressors and using goal-focused, problem-solving behaviors to manage the problems associated with the stressors.; Other Names: Moving Forward Problem Solving Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report	The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM) is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.	Baseline
Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report	The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.	1 week post treatment
Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report	The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.	3 months post treatment
Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report	The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.	6 months post treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9	The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD). This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).	Baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire-9	The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).	1 week post treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9	The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).	3 months post treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9	The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).	6 months post treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7	The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.	Baseline
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7	The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.	1 week post treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7	The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.	3 months post treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7	The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.	6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Insomnia Severity Index	The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) self-report measure captures a respondent's perception of his or her current insomnia. The ISI includes seven items that assess severity of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening problems; sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. A higher score suggests more severe insomnia.	Baseline
Insomnia Severity Index	The ISI self-report measure captures a respondent's perception of his or her current insomnia. The ISI includes seven items that assess severity of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening problems; sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. A higher score suggests more severe insomnia.	1 week post treatment
Insomnia Severity Index	The ISI self-report measure captures a respondent's perception of his or her current insomnia. The ISI includes seven items that assess severity of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening problems; sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. A higher score suggests more severe insomnia.	3 months post treatment
Insomnia Severity Index	The ISI self-report measure captures a respondent's perception of his or her current insomnia. The ISI includes seven items that assess severity of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening problems; sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. A higher score suggests more severe insomnia.	6 months post treatment
Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey	The Short Form-36 (SF-36) (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992) is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health status, social support, and functioning over the past four weeks. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better health status.	Baseline
Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey	The SF-36 (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992) is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health status, social support, and functioning over the past four weeks. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better health status.	1 week post treatment
Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey	The SF-36 (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992) is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health status, social support, and functioning over the past four weeks. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better health status.	3 months post treatment
Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey	The SF-36 (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992) is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health status, social support, and functioning over the past four weeks. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better health status.	6 months post treatment
Dose Received	Number of treatment sessions completed.	14 weeks after treatment starts

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
• Collaborators: U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Ron Acierno, PhD, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Gros DF. Development and initial evaluation of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) for veterans with affective disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
• Gros DF, Allan NP. A randomized controlled trial comparing Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) and behavioral activation in veterans with affective disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Nov;281:112541. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112541. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
• Gros DF, Merrifield C, Rowa K, Szafranski DD, Young L, McCabe RE. A Naturalistic Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behaviour Therapy (TBT) and Disorder-Specific Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Groups for the Affective Disorders. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Jan;47(1):39-51. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000309. Epub 2018 May 29.
• Gros DF, Szafranski DD, Shead SD. A real world dissemination and implementation of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) for veterans with affective disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Mar;46:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 8, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): July 1, 2028
• Study Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 22, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 22, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): May 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): December 6, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 3, 2024
• Last Verified: December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Veterans; Military Personnel
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders; Mental Disorders; Adjustment Disorders
• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00134707; PR230007 (Other Grant/Funding Number: United States Army Medical Research and Development Command)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No