Remote Ischemic Conditioning Combined With Endovascular Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

December 15, 2022 updated by: Ming Wei, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Combined With Endovascular Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

The purpose of this registry is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RIC for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) undergoing endovascular therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, and its incidence varies widely among different ethnic groups. ICAS may represent approximately 10% of ischemic stroke in Caucasians and even be responsible for up to 50% in Chinese population. Recurrent stroke risks are as high as 23% 1 year after transient ischemic stroke (TIA) or stroke in patients with a stenosis of 70% or more. The Chinese IntraCranial AtheroSclerosis (CICAS) study indicated the prevalence of ICAS was 46.6%; Patients with ICAS had more severe stroke at admission and stayed longer in hospitals compared with those without intracranial stenosis. After 12 months, recurrent stroke occurred in 3.27% of patients with no stenosis, in 3.82% for those with 50% to 69% stenosis, in 5.16% for those with 70% to 99% stenosis, and in 7.27% for those with total occlusion.

Current guidelines recommend best medical treatment (BMM) for patients with sICAS, which contains antithrombotic therapy, management of vascular risk factor (diabetes, lipids, and especially hypertension) and patient behaviors modification (diet, exercise and smoking cessation). But, even with the intervention of BMM, the recurrence of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in patients with sICAS still cannot be reduced. Endovascular therapy with intracranial angioplasty and/or stenting holds great promise as a treatment for sICAS. A recent trial found that, compared with bare-metal stent, drug-eluting stent reduced the risks of In-stent restenosis and ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with sICAS. However, endovascular therapy for patients with sICAS is known to be associated with potentially serious complications such as cerebral hyper-perfusion syndrome, intracranial hemorrhage, embolism and In-stent restenosis, etc. Those are the main reasons that affect the effect of endovascular therapy, thus limiting its application and popularization to a great degree.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) is one of the most potent neuroprotective approaches that can minimize neuronal damage by protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury and promote neuronal recovery by stimulating endogenous protective mechanism through transiently occluding the blood supply to non-significant organs or tissues such as limbs. The investigators see a promising future for RIC in facilitating further clinical translation and application due to its unique features of safety, simplicity and non-invasiveness. In recent years, the safety and efficacy of RIC on stroke intervention has been confirmed by a series of basic and clinical researches, among which RIC in combination with adjuvant drug therapy for sICAS-induced ischemic stroke patient improve cerebral blood flow and reduce stroke recurrence. Since its safety and efficacy has been verified, RIC can also be used to reduce the risks of In-stent restenosis for patients with carotid stent implantation and has extensive application prospects for patients with severe acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy.

There is not enough evidence as to provide any specific recommendation regarding the use of RIC in sICAS patients, But we speculate that RIC has a certain effect on preventing perioperative complications for patients with sICAS undergoing endovascular therapy. Therefore, we intend to conduct this prospective cohort study to shed light on the utility of this promising therapy.

This study prospectively collects data of patients with sICAS who receive endovascular therapy in the Comprehensive Neurovascular Ward of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital. Depending on their preference, patients enrolled in this registry will be divided into 2 groups, receiving either endovascular therapy alone or endovascular therapy plus RIC respectively.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300222
        • TianJinHH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study prospectively collects data of patients with sICAS who receive endovascular therapy in the Comprehensive Neurovascular Ward of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital. Depending on their preference, patients enrolled in this registry will be divided into 2 groups, receiving either endovascular therapy alone or endovascular therapy plus RIC respectively.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient admitted from Jan. 1st 2023 to Jan. 1st 2025;
  2. Age ≥ 18;
  3. Intracranial atherosclerosis stenosis measured as ≥70% by digital subtraction angiography or by other noninvasive methods, such as transcranial doppler, computed tomography angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography;
  4. A history of stroke/transient ischemic attack attributed to ICAS;
  5. Verbal and written informed consent is provided at the time of admission by patients or their legally authorized representatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stenosis of other causes;
  2. Prior ipsilateral stroke with residual deficits;
  3. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure ≥200 mm Hg despite medications at enrollment);
  4. Peripheral vascular disease (especially subclavian arterial and upper limb artery stenosis or occlusion).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Endovascular therapy
According to current guideline recommendations, patients enrolled in this cohort will receive standardized perioperative management, endovascular therapy, and postoperative medical therapy.
Endovascular therapy+Remote ischemic conditioning

Patients enrolled in this cohort will receive the same treatment as those in the endovascular therapy alone cohort as well as additional remote ischemic conditioning treatment.

Remote ischemic conditioning treatment protocol: RIC will be applied immediately after admission to the integrated neurovascular ward and the treatment continues until the patient is discharged, Once the patient is discharged, the choice of whether to continue RIC treatment depends on the patient's preference. RIC was induced through a standard blood pressure cuff placed around the non-paretic arm. The protocol includes 5 cycles of intermittent manually induced upper limb ischemia, alternating 5 minutes of inflation (20mmHg above systolic blood pressure), and 5 minutes of deflation twice a day.

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) refers to a process whereby periods of intermittent ischemia, typically via the cyclical application of a blood pressure cuff to a limb at above systolic pressure, confers systemic protection against ischemia in spatially distinct vascular territories.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The presence of ≥1 new brain lesions on DWI within 48 hours after endovascular stenting
Time Frame: 48 hours
A new brain lesion was diagnosed if increased signal intensity was visible on DWI with correspondent decreased signal on apparent diffusion coefficient.
48 hours
Incidence of clinical adverse events within 12 months after endovascular stenting
Time Frame: 12 months
Clinical adverse events include ischemic stroke, TIA, acute myocardial infarction,hemorrhagic stroke, hyperperfusion syndrome, and death.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of new brain lesions on DWI within 48 hours after endovascular stenting
Time Frame: 48 hours
The number of new DWI lesions
48 hours
The volume of new brain lesions on DWI within 48 hours after endovascular stenting
Time Frame: 48 hours
The volume of single lesions, and volume of all lesions were measured on DWI.
48 hours
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0.
12 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months

The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. 0 - No symptoms.

  1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
  2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
  3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted.
  4. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted.
  5. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.
  6. - Dead.functional disability.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ming Wei, PhD, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Arteriosclerosis

Clinical Trials on Remote Ischemic Conditioning

3
Subscribe