Art Therapy to Promote Wellbeing and Self-care in Resident Physicians. (ATMIR)

This study evaluates if an art therapy intervention could lower resident physician's work-related stress and if it could promote their self-care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to determine if an art therapy intervention could promote the well-being of resident physicians of an university tertiary hospital, as specialized physicians trainees exposed to the risk of burnout.

Using a cycle of 6 bimonthly sessions of group art therapy, the intervention stimulates the creative activity of the participants through various art materials and techniques. Next, they are invited to share their reflexions about the artworks produced, with the group and in presence of the art therapist.

The study mainly evaluates the work-related stress and the self-care grade of the participants, before the intervention, just after it and after a follow-up period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital Sant Pau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

23 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • belonging to the resident physicians collective of the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being with a diagnostic of major depression
  • receiving psychotherapy o similar

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group art therapy
Cycle of 6 2-hours bimonthly group art therapy sessions.

Participant's creativity is stimulated by visual arts materials and various art therapy techniques, in relation to 6 topics: self-care, stress management, flourishing caregiving, challenging caregiving, loss and grief, and sense of professional meaning.

The strategy consists of stimulating an observant and symbolic gaze, facilitating visual expression, promoting communication about what it has been expressed, and gather learning from the multidimensional impact of the creative art process (sensations, emotions, cognitions and spiritual experiences).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of a change in burnout level
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Test (MBI-GS). Minimum-maximum values of Exhaustion subscale: 0-54, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Cynicism subscale: 0-30, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Professional efficacy subscale: 0-48, lower scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in burnout level
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Test (MBI-GS). Minimum-maximum values of Exhaustion subscale: 0-54, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Cynicism subscale: 0-30, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Professional efficacy subscale: 0-48, lower scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in burnout level
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Test (MBI-GS). Minimum-maximum values of Exhaustion subscale: 0-54, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Cynicism subscale: 0-30, lower scores mean better outcome; Minimum-maximum values of Professional efficacy subscale: 0-48, lower scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of a change in work-related stress
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PFS 14). Minimum-maximum values: 0-56; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in work-related stress
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PFS 14). Minimum-maximum values: 0-56; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in work-related stress
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PFS 14). Minimum-maximum values: 0-56; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in professional quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in professional quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in professional quality of life
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; lower scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-care
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated original Spanish version of Self-care Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-care
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated original Spanish version of Self-care Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-care
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated original Spanish version of Self-care Scale. Minimum-maximum values: 9-45; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-awareness
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Minimum-maximum values: 15-75; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-awareness
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Minimum-maximum values: 15-75; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in self-awareness
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Minimum-maximum values: 15-75; higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in empathy
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Minimum-maximum values: 28-140, higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in empathy
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Minimum-maximum values: 28-140, higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in empathy
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Minimum-maximum values: 28-140, higher scores mean better outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in compassion
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Compassion and Satisfaction Fatigue Test (ProQoL version IV). Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 10-50; Compassion satisfaction subscale: higher scores mean better outcome; Burnout subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome; Secondary traumatic stress subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in compassion
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Compassion and Satisfaction Fatigue Test (ProQoL version IV). Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 10-50; Compassion satisfaction subscale: higher scores mean better outcome; Burnout subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome; Secondary traumatic stress subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in compassion
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Compassion and Satisfaction Fatigue Test (ProQoL version IV). Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 10-50; Compassion satisfaction subscale: higher scores mean better outcome; Burnout subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome; Secondary traumatic stress subscale: higher scores mean a worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in fear of death
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale. Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 7-35; higher scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 1 week after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in fear of death
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale. Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 7-35; higher scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 3 months follow up after cycle completion.
Assessment of a change in fear of death
Time Frame: From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.
Score calculations from the validated Spanish version of the Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale. Minimum-maximum values in each subscale: 7-35; higher scores mean worse outcome.
From baseline assessed 1 week before art therapy sessions cycle starting, at 6 months follow up after cycle completion.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative aspects gathered from the intervention
Time Frame: At 1 week after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Information gathered through a semi-structured questionnaire produced by the research team, about perceived helpfulness, emotions and sensations, preferences and drawbacks, learnings, expectation of a professional and/or personal impact.
At 1 week after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Qualitative aspects gathered from the intervention
Time Frame: At 3 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Information gathered through a semi-structured questionnaire produced by the research team, about perceived helpfulness, emotions and sensations, preferences and drawbacks, learnings, expectation of a professional and/or personal impact.
At 3 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Qualitative aspects gathered from the intervention
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Information gathered through a semi-structured questionnaire produced by the research team, about perceived helpfulness, emotions and sensations, preferences and drawbacks, learnings, expectation of a professional and/or personal impact.
At 6 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Perception of a change process
Time Frame: At 1 week after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Audio recording interview and verbatim transcription to explore a possible experience of a change process.
At 1 week after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Perception of a change process
Time Frame: At 3 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Audio recording interview and verbatim transcription to explore a possible experience of a change process.
At 3 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Perception of a change process
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.
Audio recording interview and verbatim transcription to explore a possible experience of a change process.
At 6 months follow up after art therapy sessions cycle completion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Pascual López, MD, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Palliative Care Unit Director.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIBSP-ART-2022-21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work-Related Stress

Clinical Trials on Art therapy

Subscribe