Effects of Manual Therapy in Strenght, Pain and Functional Capacity for Sport Related Groin Pain

December 26, 2025 updated by: Silvia Lahuerta Martín, University of Valladolid

Effects on Pain, Strength and Functional Capacity of High Force Distraction of the Hip in Athletes With Osteitis Pubis.

Athletic osteitis pubis is a pathologic entity that can cause functional impairment. Scientific evidence have noticed that athletes experiment pain and a decrease on strength. Moreover, this symptomathology can affect daily life and functionality. There is no scientific evidence about the influence of manual therapy (MT) as a single treatment to improve this condition. The investigators decided to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of a MT technique with placebo technique.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Soria, Spain, 42004
        • Silvia Lahuerta Martín

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Athletes diagnosed with osteitis pubis stage 1 with at least 3 months of evolution.
  • Internal rotation ROM limited.
  • Positive provocation pain tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain due to intraarticular hip pathology.
  • Hip pain due to inflamatory diseases.
  • Previous surgical interventions in hip, pelvis or lumbar spine.
  • MRI results or provocation pain tests inconcluyent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High force lateral distraction group
High force lateral distraction of the hip in maximun adjusted position.
High force lateral distraction on the affected hip.
Sham Comparator: Placebo distraction group
Placebo lateral distraction of the affected hip in maximun adjusted position.
Placebo lateral distraction on the affected hip.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strength
Time Frame: Baseline
Strength evaluate for internal and external hip rotators with a conical pulley.
Baseline
Strength
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Strength evaluate for internal and external hip rotators with a conical pulley.
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Strength
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Strength evaluate for internal and external hip rotators with a conical pulley.
3 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain in sports activities
Time Frame: Baseline
Appearance time of pain during activities
Baseline
Pain in sports activities
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Appearance time of pain during activities
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Pain in sports activities
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Appearance time of pain during activities
3 months follow-up
Pain intensity during/after pain provocation tests: Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests
Time Frame: Baseline
Appearance of pain during or after the execution of Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests. If pain appears it will be reported by the patient using visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, in which higher scores are worse.
Baseline
Pain intensity after pain provocation tests: Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Appearance of pain during or after the execution of Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests. If pain appears it will be reported by the patient using visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, in which higher scores are worse.
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Pain intensity after pain provocation tests: Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Appearance of pain during or after the execution of Single adductor, squeeze and bilateral adductor tests. If pain appears it will be reported by the patient using visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, in which higher scores are worse.
3 months follow-up
Functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline
Evaluated with a patient reported outcome questionnaire called Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS) which assesses pain, symptoms, physical function in daily living, physical function in sport and recreation, participation in physical activities and hip and groin -related quality of life. For each item answer range from "never" to "always".
Baseline
Functional capacity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Evaluated with a patient reported outcome questionnaire called Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS) which assesses pain, symptoms, physical function in daily living, physical function in sport and recreation, participation in physical activities and hip and groin -related quality of life. For each item answer range from "never" to "always".
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Functional capacity
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Evaluated with a patient reported outcome questionnaire called Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS) which assesses pain, symptoms, physical function in daily living, physical function in sport and recreation, participation in physical activities and hip and groin -related quality of life. For each item answer range from "never" to "always".
3 months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment expectancy and credibility
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Evaluated with Credibility and expectancy Questionaire (CEQ) in which the patient answer question related to the expectations of the intervention. Higher values mean better expectations on the therapy.
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Treatment expectancy and credibility
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
Evaluated with Credibility and expectancy Questionaire (CEQ) in which the patient answer question related to the expectations of the intervention. Higher values mean better expectations on the therapy.
3 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Lahuerta Martín, University of Valladolid
  • Study Director: Luis Ceballos Laita, University of Valladolid
  • Study Director: Sandra Jiménez del Barrio, University of Valladolid
  • Study Director: Maria Teresa Mingo Gómez, University of Valladolid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 067/229211

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Athletic Pubalgia

Clinical Trials on High force lateral distraction

Subscribe