LSCI and Thermography in Diabetic Foot Patients Affected by Ulcer(s): (MY-FOOT-B) (MY-FOOT-B)

Image Features of LSCI and Thermography for Prediction of Healing Trajectory in Diabetic Foot Patients Affected by the First (or Successive) Ulcer: (MY-FOOT-B)

The objective of this observational study is to predict healing at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer, by means of combined data monitoring of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and temperature measurements during patient visits in hospital.

In order to achieve this objective, study aims to produce a logistic regression model and then evaluate its prognostic ability by means of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve.

Patients with diabetes mellitus and suffering from ulcer and receiving health care will undergo regular microcirculatory measurements including LSCI scans in and around the ulcer location and thermography.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study aims to predict healing at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer, by means of combined data monitoring of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and temperature measurements during patient visits in hospital.

In order to achieve this objective, the study aims to produce a logistic regression model and then evaluate its prognostic ability by means of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve.

The variables evaluated for the model will include demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients, location and seriousness of the ulcer, alongside LSCI and temperature measurements at baseline and different timepoints. The development of the model will include a rigorous variables selection in order to produce a parsimonious model.

In the method proposed by Mennes, LSCI measurements at baseline, biological zero, post occlusion peak, and other parameters like non-invasive blood pressure measurements were individually evaluated as possible prognostic factors of healing trajectory at 26 weeks. All these parameters, when assessed at their highest possible value of sensibility and specificity, produced AUCs always inferior to 0.65. The highest value of AUC (0.625) was reached by toe pressure parameter when calculated using a threshold value of 54 mmHg.

From diagnostic literature, an AUC of ≥ 0.8 is considered excellent result, while an AUC < 0.7 is considered less than acceptable. Since the Mennes's method showed these results, study investigators set the AUC resulting from the model under the null hypothesis (H0) to be equal to 0.65. By including all these parameters, alongside the other mentioned variables, in a single prognostic model, study investigators expect to increase this prognostic ability. Therefore, in this study, investigators would like to detect an AUC ≥ 0.8 (H1). With these hypotheses, a power of 80%, a one-sided I type error of 5% and a prevalence of 43% of healed patients at 26 weeks, a total of 82 patients should be enrolled.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with diabetes mellitus and suffering from ulcer and receiving health care at study participating hospitals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a confirmed diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (more than 5 years from diagnosis),
  • aged between 18 and 80 years,
  • patients affected by one foot ulcer (defined as break of the skin of the foot that involves at least the epidermis and part of the dermis )
  • signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having multiple foot ulcers,
  • having an amputation of the forefoot or an amputation at a more proximal location of the foot (e.g., midfoot or hindfoot),
  • severe foot infection (IWGDF grade 4),
  • being incapacitated or undergoing cancer treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under ROC curve generated by the statistical model able to discriminate between healing and not healing ulcers
Time Frame: at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer
to discriminate between healing and not healing ulcers by means of combined data monitoring of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and temperature measurements during patient visits in hospital
at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The predictive positive and negative value related to the score test, based of calculation of likelihood ratio.
Time Frame: at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer
The predictive positive and negative value related to the score test, based of calculation of likelihood ratio.
at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer
The AUC of the models estimated according to different sites of ulcers.
Time Frame: at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer
The AUC of the models estimated according to different sites of ulcers.
at 26 weeks after the first visit in patients affected by the first ulcer

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cesare Miranda, MD, Pordenone Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

3
Subscribe