A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Leriglitazone in Adult Male Subjects With Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALYX)

July 28, 2026 updated by: Minoryx Therapeutics, S.L.
A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Leriglitazone in Adults Male Subjects with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital Austral
      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • Federal University of São Paulo
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • ICM La Pitie Salpetriere
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie-Leipzig
      • New Delhi, India, 110060
        • Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital 12 de Octubre
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3AX
        • National Hospital For Neurology and Neurosurgery
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-5978
        • Stanford University Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Kennedy Krieger Institute
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneota, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is male and aged ≥18 years.
  • Subject has progressive cALD, defined as GdE+ brain lesions.
  • Subjects for whom HSCT is not recommended by the investigator or subject is not willing to undergo HSCT.
  • Subject has a Loes score ≥0.5 and ≤12 at Screening.
  • Subject does not have major functional disability in the Major Functional Disabilities-Neurological Function Score (MFD-NFS), except for "wheelchair bound" or "total incontinence", which will be allowed as these are considered expected symptoms of AMN in the time course of the disease
  • Subject does not have major cognitive impairment which would impair his ability to take part in the study as determined by the investigator at screening.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who had previous bone marrow transplantation (HSCT) or treatment with ex-vivo gene therapy (eli-Cel).
  • Subject has known type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
  • Subject has known hypersensitivity or intolerance to pioglitazone or any other thiazolidinedione.
  • Subject is taking or has taken honokiol, pioglitazone, or other thiazolidinediones within 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Subject with current participation in another interventional clinical study or within 1 month prior to Screening.
  • Subject with other medical, neuropsychiatric or social conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, are likely to adversely affect the risk-benefit of study participation, interfere with study compliance, or confound the study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo will match the study drug visually and by taste
Active Comparator: Leriglitazone
Leriglitazone Treatment
Leriglitazone at a strength of 15 mg/ml. Once-daily dosing at an initial volume of 10 ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Time Frame: Interim analysis 1 (at 18 months of treatment)
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Interim analysis 1 (at 18 months of treatment)
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Time Frame: Interim analysis 2 (at 27 months of treatment)
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Interim analysis 2 (at 27 months of treatment)
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Time Frame: Final analysis (at 36 months of treatment)
The primary endpoint will be the time to death or the subject becoming bedridden with a requirement for permanent ventilatory support, wichever comes earlier, in subjects treated with leriglitazone compared to placebo.
Final analysis (at 36 months of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Loes Score.
Time Frame: Interim analysis 1 (at 18 months of treatment)
Change from Baseline in Loes Score. Loes Score Minimum = 0 Maximum =34 0 better outcome (healthy) 34 worst osutcome
Interim analysis 1 (at 18 months of treatment)
Change from Baseline in Loes Score
Time Frame: Interim analysis 2 (at 27 months of treatment)
Change from Baseline in Loes Score. Loes Score Minimum = 0 Maximum =34 0 better outcome (healthy) 34 worst osutcome
Interim analysis 2 (at 27 months of treatment)
Change from Baseline in Loes Score
Time Frame: Final analysis (at 36 months of treatment)
Change from Baseline in Loes Score. Loes Score Minimum = 0 Maximum =34 0 better outcome (healthy) 34 worst osutcome
Final analysis (at 36 months of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe