Promoting Pupils' Physical Literacy (3PL)

March 18, 2026 updated by: Peter Bentsen, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention
This pilot study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a previously developed and tested physical literacy (PL) intervention. A promising and internationally tested intervention, the Youth Physical Activity Towards Health (Y PATH), is based on the theory of PL and has proven to be effectful on children's PA levels and motor skills The Promoting Pupils' Physical Literacy (3 PL) project aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of the previously developed and tested Y-PATH intervention in a Danish context among a pupils (9 11 years of age). The hypothesis is that a revised 3 PL intervention protocol, aiming to increase pupils' PL, is ready for effectiveness testing by the end of this project.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This pilot study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a previously developed and tested physical literacy (PL) intervention. Regular participation in physical activity (PA) through life can improve health and reduce the risk of developing several chronic diseases like diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. However, a considerable number of Danish children and adolescents do not meet national PA recommendations. Over the last few years, the construct of PL has gained popularity around the world and has become recognized as a proximal measure for lifelong engagement in PA. PL is a multidisciplinary and comprehensive concept describing an individual's prerequisites to participate in and adhere to physical activities throughout the life course PL includes the elements motivation, confidence, motor skills, physical capacity, knowledge and understanding. In Denmark, development towards theoretically driven and evidence-based PL interventions that aim to increase children's PL have not yet begun. A promising and internationally tested intervention, the Youth Physical Activity Towards Health (Y-PATH), is based on the theory of PL and has proven to be effectful on children's PA levels and motor skills. The Promoting Pupils' Physical Literacy (3 PL) project aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of the previously developed and tested Y-PATH intervention in a Danish context among pupils (9-11 years of age). The hypothesis is that a revised 3 PL intervention protocol, aiming to increase pupils' PL, is ready for effectiveness testing by the end of this project.

Four schools will be recruited and randomly assigned to intervention or control condition. The primary outcomes include the feasibility and acceptability of the 3 PL intervention and will be in concordance with guidance proposed by the Medical Research Council and The Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development. Feasibility of the practicality and recruitment process will be assessed within a document log administered by the project group. The acceptability including demand and experiences, and the intervention implementation degree (secondary outcome) will be evaluated by short bimonthly questionnaires to teachers and interviews with pupils, teachers, parents, and school managers. Preliminary effectiveness (secondary outcome) will be tested by comparing changes in pupils' PL assessed with the Danish Assessment of Physical Literacy (DAPL) tool.

First and foremost, the testing of feasibility and acceptability of a previously developed international intervention will provide a revised 3 PL intervention, a Template for Intervention Description and Replication TIDieR checklist and a protocol, which will provide a solid empirical and theoretical foundation for a future upscaled effectiveness study. The development of a TIDieR checklist and a protocol provides international and national researchers the opportunity to use and compare effectiveness across countries and cultures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

336

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Frederiksberg
      • Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000
        • Recruiting
        • Center for Clinical Research and Prevension, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Nørrebro
      • Copenhagen, Nørrebro, Denmark, Nørre Allé 51
    • Odense M

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

School/class-level

  • Non-special needs municipal school classes
  • Classes that are not in other school development or research projects which would most likely influence and bias the results

Pupil-level

  • Pupils with parents/guardians who have provided written informed consent, allowing their child to participate
  • Pupils who have provide an oral assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pupils who do not live up to the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Two schools (grade 4-5) will be randomly assigned to recieve the 3PL intervention in their physical education classes during one school year.
The physical literacy intervention 3PL is based on activities, games, and modifications of the physical education classes to target and enhance pupils' physical literacy.
Other Names:
  • 3PL
No Intervention: Control group
Two schools (grade 4-5) will be randomly assigned to the control group and will continue their normal physical education classes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptance rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of invited schools participating.
6 months
Success of intervention implementation in PE lessons
Time Frame: 11 months
Three observations during physical education lessons (PE) that assess the acceptability of the intervention. Also, PE teachers will receive a weekly questionnaire to assess whether they have used the intervention materials in their PE lessons.
11 months
Success of intervention implementation in school systems
Time Frame: 11 months
Qualitative interviews with school managers and teachers will be undertaken to detect perceived positive or negative effects on organization and how the intervention fits within the school culture.
11 months
Success of intervention implementation for pupils
Time Frame: 11 months
Qualitative interviews with pupils will be undertaken to understand their experiences of the PE lessons.
11 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical literacy (preliminary effectiveness)
Time Frame: 11 months
This study will assess PL among the pupils before and after the intervention period using the Danish Assessment of Physical Literacy (DAPL) that has been developed and validated in the DAPL project supported by TrygFonden #125640.
11 months
Daily physical activity (preliminary effectiveness)
Time Frame: 11 months
Physical Activity will be measured with Axivity® AX3 accelerometers worn for 7 consecutive days. Axivity tracks physical activity in activity counts.
11 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Bentsen, PhD, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention
  • Study Director: Mads Bølling, PhD, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention
  • Study Director: Thea Toft Amholt, PhD, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention
  • Study Director: Glen Nielsen, PhD, University of Copenhagen
  • Study Director: Paulina Melby, PhD, University of Copenhagen
  • Study Director: Mette Kurtzhals, Cand.scient, University of Southern Denmark
  • Study Director: Peter Elsborg, PhD, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Literacy

Clinical Trials on Promoting Pupils' Physical Literacy Intervention

Subscribe