- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06479707
Digital Literacy Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults
Digital Literacy Pilot Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a one-arm pilot trial to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention Digital Literacy Pilot Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults. Each participant will receive 4-6 home visits with 3-4 interim phone calls based on the participant's individual digital literacy needs and goals. Each participant will receive internet connectivity (if not already available), a tablet (if not already available) and tailored action plans co-developed by the participant and the interventionist. In each participant will also have pre and post-intervention visits with the research team.
In earlier phases, research team members conducted preliminary activities to design the intervention using Human-Centered Design techniques.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 65 years old or older
- English proficient
- Willingness to improve digital literacy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment as defined by a 6-item Callahan Cognitive Screener
- Hospitalization overnight more than 3 times in the last 12 months by self-report.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Pilot
|
This intervention consists of 4-6 home visits with 3-4 interim phone calls based on the participant's individual digital literacy needs and goals.
Each participant will receive internet connectivity (if not already available), a tablet (if not already available) and tailored action plans co-developed by the participant and the interventionist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Health Team Communication as assessed by the CollaboRATE Scale Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The CollaboRATE scale measure is a 3 item self-report questionnaire on patient's shared decision making.
It is scored on a 10-point anchored scale, ranging from 0 ("no effort was made") to 9 ("every effort was made").
Higher scores indicate more shared decision making.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the Coping Self-Efficacy Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
Coping Self-Efficacy is a 13 item instrument on a scale of 0 ('can't do at all') to 10 ('certain can do').
A higher score indicates higher level of self-efficacy when implementing coping strategies.
Score range 0-130.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Chronic Disease Management Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
Self-Efficacy of Chronic Disease Management Instrument is a 6 item instrument on a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).
Lower scores indicate lower self-efficacy as indicated by confidence.
Score range 6-60.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Social engagement as assessed by the Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Lubben Social Network Scale is a 7-item questionnaire that measures the size of social networks of family and friends.
The score ranges between 0 and 30, with higher scores indicated more social engagement.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Social engagement as assessed by the Krause-Borawski-Clark Support Interactions Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Krause-Borawski-Clark Support Interactions Scale is a 10-item self-reported questionnaire that measures social interactions.
The scale is broken down into different domains; scores range from very often (4); fairly often (3); once in a while (2); never (1) or binary-- satisfied (1) or not satisfied (0) depending on domain within the questionnaire.
Items are summed to form a single composite score range 10-40, Higher scores on the scale is associated with better personal perception and social support.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in quality of life as assessed by the European Quality of Life (Euro-QOL-5D)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Euro-QOL-5D is a self-report measure that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Response choices are severe, moderate or none (levels of disability) across domains.
Questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale, where respondents report their perceived health status ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in health literacy as assessed by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The REALM screening tool assesses ability for respondent to correctly pronounce a list of common medical words and lay terms using the REALM Patient Word List.
A score of 0-18 is 3rd grade and below, score of 19-44 is 4th to 6th grade, score of 45-60 is 7th to 8th grade, and a score of 61-66 is high school or above.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in digital health literacy as assessed by the Digital Health Care Literacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Digital Health Care Literacy scale is a 3-item questionnaire.
Response options ranged from strongly disagree (0 points) to strongly agree (4 points).
Total possible score options ranged from 0-12.
Higher scores indicated higher digital health care literacy.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in digital health literacy as assessed by the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The MDPQ is a 16-item questionnaire divided into 8 sub-scales.
All items are on a 5-point scale with choices never tried (1), not at all (2), not very easily (3), somewhat easily (4), and to very easily (5).
A low score indicates low mobile device proficiency.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Function as assessed by Lawton & Brody's assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The assessment contains 8 questions with answers that are either a score of 0 or 1.
A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men to avoid potential gender bias.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Function as assessed by the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
6 questions, each 1 point for a total score of 6.
A score closer to 6 indicates high patient independence.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Brief Pain Inventory - is a 4-item self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of this pain on the patient's daily functioning.
The patient is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 10 point scale.
For the 10 point scale, 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Score range 0-40.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-2)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The PHQ-2 is a item self-reported questionnaire to assess frequency of depression.
The total score ranges from 0-6.
A score of 3 or greater signifies that major depressive disorder is likely.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Change in Frailty as assessed by the Fried Frailty Phenotype
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
|
The Fried Frailty Phenotype contains 5 criteria: unintentional weight loss >10lbs >5% of body mass in the last year, weakness (handgrip strength measurement), exhaustion (based on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), slow gait (walking time over a distance), and low physical activity.
People who had none of the criteria were considered non-frail, people who had 1 and 2 criteria were considered pre-frail, and people who had ≥3 criteria were considered frail.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability at endpoint of intervention assessed by survey
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Score on Likert scale-based questions re: program content & structure satisfaction, willingness to recommend.
Survey developed by study team.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by qualitative questions
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Open/ Close Ended Questions.
Questions developed by study team.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by recruitment rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Recruitment Rate.
Measured by how many people recruited over designated period of time Mean time for survey administration, Withdrawal Rate, Cost.
Questions developed by study team.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by completion rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Measured by how many people complete the intervention over designated period of time
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by mean time for survey administration
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Mean time for survey administration measured by the average time it takes data collector to administer survey to participants
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by withdrawal rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Withdrawal Rate.
Measured by how many people withdrawal from the intervention over designated period of time
|
9 weeks
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by average cost
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Cost. measured by average cost to deliver the intervention per person
|
9 weeks
|
|
Fidelity as assessed by percent completion of intervention items at endpoint of intervention
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
|
% tasks/ patient- directed content delivery per session
|
through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melissa Hladek, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00437921
- P30AG021334-21 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
Clinical Trials on Digital Literacy Intervention
-
Forman Christian College, PakistanSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi; doctHERsCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongSino Group; NG TENG FONG Charitable FoundationCompleted
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ataturk UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Lithuanian Sports UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | eHealth Literacy | Technology AcceptanceLithuania
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheUniversidad de Murcia; Erasmus Medical Center; Thomas More University of Applied... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingProstate Cancer | Health LiteracySpain
-
Giresun UniversityRecruitingDigital Literacy | Digital Privacy | Online Privacy AwarenessTurkey (Türkiye)
-
National University of SingaporeNot yet recruitingAged | Cognition | Digital Health LiteracySingapore
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingQuality of Life | Postmenopausal Symptoms | Health Literacy | Literacy | DigitalismTurkey
-
Igdir UniversityAtaturk UniversityCompleted