Digital Literacy Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults

May 27, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Digital Literacy Pilot Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults

The investigators propose a person-directed, values-based digital literacy intervention to address the community-identified barriers of health literacy, health communication and social support to improve quality of life and specific disease related metrics in the older adult's own home. This intervention will be a way to address the community-identified barriers of health literacy, health communication and social support to improve quality of life and specific disease related metrics in the older adult's own home.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a one-arm pilot trial to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention Digital Literacy Pilot Intervention to Address Support, Literacy and Communication in Older Adults. Each participant will receive 4-6 home visits with 3-4 interim phone calls based on the participant's individual digital literacy needs and goals. Each participant will receive internet connectivity (if not already available), a tablet (if not already available) and tailored action plans co-developed by the participant and the interventionist. In each participant will also have pre and post-intervention visits with the research team.

In earlier phases, research team members conducted preliminary activities to design the intervention using Human-Centered Design techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 years old or older
  • English proficient
  • Willingness to improve digital literacy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment as defined by a 6-item Callahan Cognitive Screener
  • Hospitalization overnight more than 3 times in the last 12 months by self-report.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Pilot
This intervention consists of 4-6 home visits with 3-4 interim phone calls based on the participant's individual digital literacy needs and goals. Each participant will receive internet connectivity (if not already available), a tablet (if not already available) and tailored action plans co-developed by the participant and the interventionist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health Team Communication as assessed by the CollaboRATE Scale Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The CollaboRATE scale measure is a 3 item self-report questionnaire on patient's shared decision making. It is scored on a 10-point anchored scale, ranging from 0 ("no effort was made") to 9 ("every effort was made"). Higher scores indicate more shared decision making.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the Coping Self-Efficacy Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Coping Self-Efficacy is a 13 item instrument on a scale of 0 ('can't do at all') to 10 ('certain can do'). A higher score indicates higher level of self-efficacy when implementing coping strategies. Score range 0-130.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Chronic Disease Management Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Self-Efficacy of Chronic Disease Management Instrument is a 6 item instrument on a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). Lower scores indicate lower self-efficacy as indicated by confidence. Score range 6-60.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Social engagement as assessed by the Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Lubben Social Network Scale is a 7-item questionnaire that measures the size of social networks of family and friends. The score ranges between 0 and 30, with higher scores indicated more social engagement.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Social engagement as assessed by the Krause-Borawski-Clark Support Interactions Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Krause-Borawski-Clark Support Interactions Scale is a 10-item self-reported questionnaire that measures social interactions. The scale is broken down into different domains; scores range from very often (4); fairly often (3); once in a while (2); never (1) or binary-- satisfied (1) or not satisfied (0) depending on domain within the questionnaire. Items are summed to form a single composite score range 10-40, Higher scores on the scale is associated with better personal perception and social support.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in quality of life as assessed by the European Quality of Life (Euro-QOL-5D)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Euro-QOL-5D is a self-report measure that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Response choices are severe, moderate or none (levels of disability) across domains. Questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale, where respondents report their perceived health status ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in health literacy as assessed by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The REALM screening tool assesses ability for respondent to correctly pronounce a list of common medical words and lay terms using the REALM Patient Word List. A score of 0-18 is 3rd grade and below, score of 19-44 is 4th to 6th grade, score of 45-60 is 7th to 8th grade, and a score of 61-66 is high school or above.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in digital health literacy as assessed by the Digital Health Care Literacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Digital Health Care Literacy scale is a 3-item questionnaire. Response options ranged from strongly disagree (0 points) to strongly agree (4 points). Total possible score options ranged from 0-12. Higher scores indicated higher digital health care literacy.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in digital health literacy as assessed by the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The MDPQ is a 16-item questionnaire divided into 8 sub-scales. All items are on a 5-point scale with choices never tried (1), not at all (2), not very easily (3), somewhat easily (4), and to very easily (5). A low score indicates low mobile device proficiency.
Baseline, 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Function as assessed by Lawton & Brody's assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The assessment contains 8 questions with answers that are either a score of 0 or 1. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men to avoid potential gender bias.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Function as assessed by the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
6 questions, each 1 point for a total score of 6. A score closer to 6 indicates high patient independence.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Brief Pain Inventory - is a 4-item self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of this pain on the patient's daily functioning. The patient is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 10 point scale. For the 10 point scale, 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Score range 0-40.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-2)
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The PHQ-2 is a item self-reported questionnaire to assess frequency of depression. The total score ranges from 0-6. A score of 3 or greater signifies that major depressive disorder is likely.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Change in Frailty as assessed by the Fried Frailty Phenotype
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
The Fried Frailty Phenotype contains 5 criteria: unintentional weight loss >10lbs >5% of body mass in the last year, weakness (handgrip strength measurement), exhaustion (based on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), slow gait (walking time over a distance), and low physical activity. People who had none of the criteria were considered non-frail, people who had 1 and 2 criteria were considered pre-frail, and people who had ≥3 criteria were considered frail.
Baseline, 9 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability at endpoint of intervention assessed by survey
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Score on Likert scale-based questions re: program content & structure satisfaction, willingness to recommend. Survey developed by study team.
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by qualitative questions
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Open/ Close Ended Questions. Questions developed by study team.
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by recruitment rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Recruitment Rate. Measured by how many people recruited over designated period of time Mean time for survey administration, Withdrawal Rate, Cost. Questions developed by study team.
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by completion rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Measured by how many people complete the intervention over designated period of time
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by mean time for survey administration
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Mean time for survey administration measured by the average time it takes data collector to administer survey to participants
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by withdrawal rate
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Withdrawal Rate. Measured by how many people withdrawal from the intervention over designated period of time
9 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by average cost
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Cost. measured by average cost to deliver the intervention per person
9 weeks
Fidelity as assessed by percent completion of intervention items at endpoint of intervention
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
% tasks/ patient- directed content delivery per session
through study completion, an average of 1.5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Hladek, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00437921
  • P30AG021334-21 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Digital Literacy Intervention

Subscribe